Advertisement

Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 54, Issue 9, pp 7271–7287 | Cite as

In situ TEM investigation of self-ion irradiation of nanoporous gold

  • Nicolas J. Briot
  • Maria Kosmidou
  • Rémi Dingreville
  • Khalid Hattar
  • T. John BalkEmail author
Metals
  • 33 Downloads

Abstract

The ability of nanoporous metals to avoid accumulation of damage under ion beam irradiation has been the focus of several studies in recent years. The width of the interconnected ligaments forming the network structure typically is on the order of tens of nanometers. In such confined volumes with high amounts of surface area, the accumulation of damage (defects such as stacking-fault tetrahedra and dislocation loops) can be mitigated via migration and annihilation of these defects at the free surfaces. In this work, in situ characterization of radiation damage in nanoporous gold (np-Au) was performed in the transmission electron microscope. Several samples with varying average ligament size were subjected to gold ion beams having three different energies (10 MeV, 1.7 MeV and 46 keV). The inherent radiation tolerance of np-Au was directly observed in real time, for all ion beam conditions, and the degree of ion-induced damage accumulation in np-Au ligaments is discussed here.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Daniel Buller for his assistance with the Tandem accelerator, as well Brittany Muntifering and Daniel Bufford for their help during TEM imaging. This work was performed, in part, at the Center for Integrated Nanotechnologies, an Office of Science user facility operated for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). Sandia National Laboratories is a multi-mission laboratory managed and operated by National Technology and Engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC., a wholly owned subsidiary of Honeywell International, Inc., for the U.S. Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration under contract DE-NA-0003525. The views expressed in the article do not necessarily represent the views of the U.S. Department of Energy or the United States Government. Portions of the sample preparation and characterization were performed at the University of Kentucky: access to characterization instruments and staff assistance was provided by the Electron Microscopy Center at the University of Kentucky, supported in part by the National Science Foundation/EPSCoR Award No. 1355438 and by the Commonwealth of Kentucky.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors certify that we have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest or non-financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

Supplementary material

10853_2019_3385_MOESM1_ESM.tif (44.3 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (TIFF 45331 kb)
10853_2019_3385_MOESM2_ESM.mpg (133.7 mb)
Supplementary material 2 (MPG 136949 kb)
10853_2019_3385_MOESM3_ESM.mpg (36.3 mb)
Supplementary material 3 (MPG 37214 kb)
10853_2019_3385_MOESM4_ESM.mpg (51.7 mb)
Supplementary material 4 (MPG 52915 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Zhang X et al (2018) Radiation damage in nanostructured materials. Prog Mater Sci 96:217–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Krasheninnikov AV, Nordlund K (2010) Ion and electron irradiation-induced effects in nanostructured materials. J Appl Phys 107:071301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fu EG et al (2012) Surface effects on the radiation response of nanoporous Au foams. Appl Phys Lett 101:191607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Beyerlein IJ, Caro A, Demkowicz MJ, Mara NA, Misra A, Uberuaga BP (2013) Radiation damage tolerant nanomaterials. Mater Today 16:443–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Johannes A, Holland-Moritz H, Ronning C (2015) Ion beam irradiation of nanostructures: sputtering, dopant incorporation, and dynamic annealing. Semicond Sci Technol 30:033001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mathur A, Erlebacher J (2007) Size dependence of effective Young’s modulus of nanoporous gold. Appl Phys Lett 90:061910CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Biener J, Hodge AM, Hayes JR, Volkert CA, Zepeda-Ruiz LA, Hamza AV, Abraham FF (2006) Size effects on the mechanical behavior of nanoporous Au. Nano Lett 6:2379–2382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Biener J, Hodge AM, Hamza AV (2005) Microscopic failure behavior of nanoporous gold. Appl Phys Lett 87:121908CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hodge AM, Biener J, Hayes JR, Bythrow PM, Volkert CA, Hamza AV (2007) Scaling equation for yield strength of nanoporous open-cell foams. Acta Mater 55:1343–1349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jin H-J, Kurmanaeva L, Schmauch J, Rösner H, Ivanisenko Y, Weissmüller J (2009) Deforming nanoporous metal: role of lattice coherency. Acta Mater 57:2665–2672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sun YS, Balk TJ (2011) Mechanical behavior and microstructure of nanoporous gold films. MRS Proc.  https://doi.org/10.1557/PROC-0924-Z01-02 Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Volkert CA, Lilleodden ET (2006) Size effects in the deformation of sub-micron Au columns. Philos Mag 86:5567–5579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Briot NJ, Kennerknecht T, Eberl C, Balk TJ (2014) Mechanical properties of bulk single crystalline nanoporous gold investigated by millimetre-scale tension and compression testing. Philos Mag 94:847–866CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dou R and Derby B (2011) The strength of gold nanowires and nanoporous gold. MRS Proc.  https://doi.org/10.1557/PROC-1144-LL21-04
  15. 15.
    Lührs L, Soyarslan C, Markmann J, Bargmann S, Weissmüller J (2016) Elastic and plastic Poisson’s ratios of nanoporous gold. Scr Mater 110:65–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wittstock A, Biener J, Baumer M (2010) Nanoporous gold: a new material for catalytic and sensor applications. Phys Chem Chem Phys 12:12919–12930CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Caro M et al (2014) Radiation induced effects on mechanical properties of nanoporous gold foams. Appl Phys Lett 104:233109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bringa EM et al (2012) Are nanoporous materials radiation resistant? Nano Lett 12:3351–3355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sun C et al (2014) In situ study of defect migration kinetics in nanoporous Ag with enhanced radiation tolerance. Sci Rep 4:3737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Li J et al (2017) In situ heavy ion irradiation studies of nanopore shrinkage and enhanced radiation tolerance of nanoporous Au. Sci Rep 7:39484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sun Y, Balk TJ (2008) Evolution of structure, composition, and stress in nanoporous gold thin films with grain-boundary cracks. Metall Mater Trans A 39:2656–2665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sun Y, Kucera KP, Burger SA, John Balk T (2008) Microstructure, stability and thermomechanical behavior of crack-free thin films of nanoporous gold. Scr Mater 58:1018–1021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hodge AM, Hayes JR, Caro JA, Biener J, Hamza AV (2006) Characterization and mechanical behavior of nanoporous gold. Adv Eng Mater 8:853–857CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Parida S, Kramer D, Volkert CA, Rosner H, Erlebacher J, Weissmuller J (2006) Volume change during the formation of nanoporous gold by dealloying. Phys Rev Lett 97:035504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Chisholm C, Hattar K, Minor AM (2014) In situ TEM concurrent and successive Au self-ion irradiation and He implantation. Mater Trans 55:418–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hattar K, Bufford DC, Buller DL (2014) Concurrent in situ ion irradiation transmission electron microscope. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res Sect B 338:56–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Jenkins M, Kirk M (2000) Characterisation of radiation damage by transmission electron microscopy. Institute of Physics, BristolCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hinks JA (2015) Transmission electron microscopy with in situ ion irradiation. J Mater Res 30:1214–1221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Stoller RE, Toloczko MB, Was GS, Certain AG, Dwaraknath S, Garner FA (2013) On the use of SRIM for computing radiation damage exposure. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res Sect B 310:75–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Balk TJ, Hemker KJ (2001) Experimental observations of dislocation core structures in gold and iridium. Mater Sci Eng A 309–310:108–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Donnelly SE, Birtcher RC (1998) Radiation damage from single heavy ion impacts on metal surfaces. In: Lasers and materials in industry and opto-contact workshop, SPIE, p 9Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Qian LH, Chen MW (2007) Ultrafine nanoporous gold by low-temperature dealloying and kinetics of nanopore formation. Appl Phys Lett 91:083105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Dursun A, Pugh DV, Corcoran SG (2003) Dealloying of Ag-Au alloys in halide-containing electrolytes affect on critical potential and pore size. J Electrochem Soc 150:B355–B360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Osetsky YN, Bacon DJ, Serra A, Singh BN, Golubov SI (2000) Stability and mobility of defect clusters and dislocation loops in metals. J Nucl Mater 276:65–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kitagawa K et al (1985) Ion-irradiation experiment for the fundamental studies of damage evolution of fusion materials. J Nucl Mater 133–134:395–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Nordlund K, Gao F (1999) Formation of stacking-fault tetrahedra in collision cascades. Appl Phys Lett 74:2720–2722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Barr CM, Li N, Boyce BL, Hattar K (2018) Examining the influence of grain size on radiation tolerance in the nanocrystalline regime. Appl Phys Lett 112:181903CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Chemical and Materials EngineeringUniversity of KentuckyLexingtonUSA
  2. 2.Center for Integrated NanotechnologiesSandia National LaboratoriesAlbuquerqueUSA

Personalised recommendations