Advertisement

Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 54, Issue 9, pp 7256–7270 | Cite as

Effect of the grain boundary character distribution on the self-organization of adiabatic shear bands in 1Cr18Ni9Ti austenitic stainless steel

  • Yang YangEmail author
  • Xiaolong Lian
  • Junliang Wang
Metals

Abstract

The self-organization of adiabatic shear bands (ASBs) in the steel with a different grain boundary character distribution (GBCD) was investigated using the radial collapse of thick-walled cylinders. GBCD of 1Cr18Ni9Ti austenitic stainless steel was optimized by thermo-mechanical treatment. The results showed that the proportion of special grain boundaries, especially the Σ3 grain boundaries, were increased from 27.8, 18.9 to 72.5, 55.8%, respectively. And the high-angle grain boundaries were replaced or interrupted by the low-angle grain boundaries and special grain boundary clusters. The results of optical microscopic examination showed that the shear bands mainly propagated along the clockwise direction, and the multiple shear bands influenced each other along with bifurcation and merging. Also, the number and spacing of the shear bands of the solution treatment specimen (ST specimen) and thermo-mechanical treatment specimen (TMT specimen) were the same, which meant that GBCD optimization had no obvious effect on the nucleation of shear bands. However, the lengths of ASBs in TMT specimen were much shorter than those of the ST specimen under the same deformation conditions. The slower propagation rate of ASBs in TMT specimen suggested that by introducing a large number of special grain boundaries, the GBCD optimization hindered the propagation of ASBs and improved the damage resistance under high-strain-rate loading. Also, voids were nucleated preferentially in the ASBs and coalesced along ASBs, and cracks formed finally.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 51871243, 51574290) and Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 14JJ2011).

References

  1. 1.
    Robinson JH, Nolen AM (1995) An investigation of metal matrix composites as shields for hypervelocity orbital debris impacts. Int J Impact Eng 17(4):685–696.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0734-743X(95)99891-T CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Meyers MA (1994) Dynamic behavior of materials. Wiley, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yang Y, Wang BF (2006) Dynamic recrystallization in adiabatic shear band in α-titanium. Mater Lett 60(17):2198–2202.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2005.12.097 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jiang LH, Yang Y, Wang Z, Hu HB (2018) Microstructure evolution within adiabatic shear band in peak aged ZK60 magnesium alloy. Mater Sci Eng A 711:317–324.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.02.158 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yang Y, Jiang F, Zhou BM et al (2011) Microstructural characterization and evolution mechanism of adiabatic shear band in a near beta-Ti alloy. Mater Sci Eng A 528(6):2787–2794.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2010.12.053 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Xu YB, Zhong WL, Chen YJ, Shen LT, Liu Q, Bai YL, Meyers MA (2001) Shear localization and recrystallization in dynamic deformation of 8090 Al Li alloy. Mater Sci Eng A 299A:287–295.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(00)01412-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Meyers MA, Xu YB, Xue Q, Perez-Prado MT, McNelley TR (2003) Microstructural evolution in adiabatic shear localization in stainless steel. Acta Mater 51(5):1307–1325.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6454(02)00526-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Peirs J, Tirry W, Amin-Ahmadi B, Coghe F, Verleysen P, Rabet L, Schryvers D, Degrieck J (2013) Microstructure of adiabatic shear bands in Ti6Al4V. Mater Charact 75:79–92.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2012.10.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nesterenko VF, Bondar MP (1994) Localization of deformation in collapse of a thick walled cylinder. Combust Explos Shock 30(4):500–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Grady DE (1980) Shock deformation of brittle solid. J Geophys Res 85(B2):913–924.  https://doi.org/10.1029/JB085iB02p00913 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Grady DE, Kipp ME (1987) The growth of unstable thermoplastic shear with application to steady-wave shock compression in solids. J Mech Phys Solids 35:95–118.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5096(87)90030-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wright TW, Ockendon H (1996) A scaling law for the effect of inertia on the formation of adiabatic shear bands. Int J Plast 12(7):927–934.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-6419(96)00034-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Molinari A (1997) Collective behavior and spacing of adiabatic shear bands. J Mech Phys Solids 45(9):1551–1575.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5096(97)00012-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Meyers MA, Nesterenko VF, LaSalvia JC, Xue Q (2001) Shear localization in dynamic deformation of materials: microstructural evolution and self-organization. Mater Sci Eng A 317(1):204–225.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(01)01160-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Meyers MA, Wang SL (1998) An improved method for shock consolidation of powders. Acta Metall Mater 36:925–936CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Xue Q, Nesterenko VF, Meyers MA (2003) Evaluation of the collapsing thick-walled cylinder technique for shear-band spacing. Int J Impact Eng 28(3):257–280.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0734-743x(02)00103-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Xue Q, Meyers MA, Nesterenko VF (2004) Self organization of shear bands in stainless steel. Mater Sci Eng A 384:35–46.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2004.05.069 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Xue Q, Gray T III (2006) Development of adiabatic shear bands in annealed 316L stainless steel: part I. Correlation between evolving microstructure and mechanical behavior. Metall Mater Trans A 37A:2435–2446.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02586217 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Liu MT, Li YC, Hu HB, Hu XZ (2014) A numerical model for adiabatic shear bands with application to a thick-walled cylinder in 304 stainless steel. Model Simul Mater Sci 22(1):015005.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0965-0393/22/1/015005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Liu MT, Guo ZL, Fan C et al (2016) Modeling spontaneous shear bands evolution in thick-walled cylinders subjected to external high-strain-rate loading. Int J Solid Struct 97–98:336–354.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2016.07.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Yang Y, Jiang LH, Xu Z, Wang Z (2017) An examination of adiabatic shearing behavior in ZK60 alloy with different states of heat treatment. Mater Sci Eng A 685:57–64.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2016.12.117 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Yang Y, Jiang LH (2016) Effect of heat treatment on adiabatic shear susceptibility in ZK60 magnesium alloy. Mater Sci Eng A 664:146–154.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2016.04.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yang Y, Jiang LH (2016) Self-organization of adiabatic shear bands in ZK60 magnesium alloy. Mater Sci Eng A 655:321–330.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2016.01.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Yang Y, Li XM, Chen SW, Zhang QM, Jiang F, Zheng HG (2010) Effects of pre-notches on the self-organization behaviors of shear bands in aluminum alloy. Mater Sci Eng A 527(20):5084–5091.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2010.04.079 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Yang Y, Tan GY, Chen PX et al (2012) Effects of different aging statuses and strain rate on the adiabatic shear susceptibility of 2195 aluminum–lithium alloy. Mater Sci Eng A 546(1):279–283.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2012.03.067 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Yang Y, Zheng HG, Zhao ZD et al (2011) Effect of phase composition on self-organization of shear bands in Ti-1300 titanium alloy. Mater Sci Eng A 528(25):7506–7513.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2011.06.068 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Yang Y, Zheng HG, Shi ZJ et al (2011) Effect of orientation on self-organization of shear bands in 7075 aluminum alloy. Mater Sci Eng A 528(6):2446–2453.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2010.12.050 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Watanabe H, Mukai T, Koichi I (2001) Realization of high strain rate superplasticity at low temperatures in a Mg–Zn–Zr alloy. Mater Sci Eng A 307(1–2):119–123.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(00)01974-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Shimada M, Kokawa H, Wang ZJ et al (2002) Optimization of grain boundary character distribution for intergranular corrosion resistant 304 stainless steel by twin-induced grain boundary engineering. Acta Mater 50(9):2331–2341.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6454(02)00064-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    El Wahabit M, Gavard L, Cabrera JM et al (2005) EBSD study of purity effects during hot working in austenitic stainless steels. Mater Sci Eng A 393(1):83–90.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2004.09.064 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Yang Y, Jiang LH, Luo SH et al (2016) Effect of grain boundary character distribution on the adiabatic shear susceptibility. Metall Mater Trans A 47A(9):5589–5597.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-016-3721-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lee SL, Richards NL (2005) The effect of single-step low strain and annealing of nickel on grain boundary character. Mater Sci Eng A 390(1):81–87.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2004.08.044 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Warnglen Gotsa (1985) An introduction to corrosion and protection of metals. Chapman and Hall, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Brandon DG (1966) The structure of high-angle grain boundaries. Acta Metall 14(11):1479–1484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kennedy JE (1972) In: 12th Annual symposium behavior and utilization of explosives in engineering design. ASME, Albuquerque, NMGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Pedro FN, Po-Hsun C, Andrew H, Matthew S, David JB, Vitali FN (2018) Shear band patterning and post-critical behavior in AISI 4340 steel with different microstructure. Int J Impact Eng 112:144–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Pedro FN, Po-Hsun C, Andrew H, Matthew S, David JB, Vitali FN (2018) Shear localization in 4340 steel with different microstructure using thick wall cylinder method. AIP Conf Proc 1979:070022.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5044831 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Xue Q (2001) Spatial evolution of adiabatic shear localization in stainless steel, titanium and titanium-aluminum-vanadium alloy. University of California, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Lovinger Z, Rikanati A, Rosenberg Z et al (2011) Electro-magnetic collapse of thick-walled cylinders to investigate spontaneous shear localization. Int J Impact Eng 38:918–929.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2011.06.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Xu X (2013) Effect of grain boundary design and control on the mechanical behavior of SUS304. Nanjing University of Science & Technology, NanjingGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Guduru PR, Rosakis AJ, Ravichandran G (2001) Dynamic shear bands: an investigation using high speed optical and infrared diagnostic. Mech Mater 33(7):371–402.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6636(01)00051-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Yang Y, Wang BF, Xiong J et al (2006) Adiabatic shear band on Ti side in the titanium/mild st. explosive cladding interface: experiments, simulation, microstructure evolution. Metall Mater Trans A 37(10):3131–3137.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-006-0193-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Odeshi AG, Al-ameeri S, Mirfakhraei S et al (2006) Deformation and failure mechanism in AISI 4340 steel under ballistic impact. Theor Appl Fract Mech 45:18–24.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.2005.11.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Material Science and EngineeringCentral South UniversityChangshaChina
  2. 2.Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Nonferrous Metal Materials Science and EngineeringCentral South UniversityChangshaChina

Personalised recommendations