Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 54, Issue 8, pp 6122–6139 | Cite as

Structure of nanoparticle aggregate films built using pulsed-mode electrospray atomization

  • Yaqun Zhu
  • Paul R. ChiarotEmail author


Thin continuous films with tailored micro- and nano-structure were built from nanoparticle aggregates using pulsed-mode electrospray atomization. The aggregates were assembled in-flight and delivered to a target substrate in a dry state. We report on the processing–structure relationship for an individual aggregate and reveal how their assembly determines the structure of the film. Titanium dioxide nanoparticles (P25, ~ 21 nm) were used as a model system given their importance in a wide range of applications. We describe how properties such as nanoparticle concentration, Taylor cone pulsation frequency, solvent volatility, suspension conductivity, and substrate electrical properties govern the size distribution and morphology of the aggregates. We then further report how the aggregate characteristics govern the structure of the film. Aggregates formed using electrospray possess an excess electric charge that can be maintained after they are deposited on the target substrate. This charge accumulation and its dissipation rate play a significant role in film formation. Films are thicker and exhibit a more significant periodic island structure if the dissipation rate of the accumulated charge is enhanced using a conductive substrate or by periodically deactivating the electrospray. Decreasing the separation distance increases the film thickness and island size by limiting the plume dispersion.



Support for this research was provided by the National Science Foundation (CAREER Award #1554038).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no potential conflict of interest.


  1. 1.
    Song MK, Park S, Alamgir FM et al (2011) Nanostructured electrodes for lithium-ion and lithium-air batteries: the latest developments, challenges, and perspectives. Mater Sci Eng R Rep 72:203–252. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tang J, Gomez A (2015) Control of the mesoporous structure of dye-sensitized solar cells with electrospray deposition. J Mater Chem A 3:7830–7839. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hwang D, Lee H, Jang S-Y et al (2011) Electrospray preparation of hierarchically-structured mesoporous TiO2 spheres for use in highly efficient dye-sensitized solar cells. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 3:2719–2725. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lee H, Hwang D, Jo SM et al (2012) Low-temperature fabrication of TiO2 electrodes for flexible dye-sensitized solar cells using an electrospray process. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 4:3308–3315. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fujimoto M, Kado T, Takashima W et al (2006) Dye-sensitized solar cells fabricated by electrospray coating using TiO2 nanocrystal dispersion solution. J Electrochem Soc 153:A826–A829. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    O’Regan B, Gratzel M (1991) A low-cost, high-efficiency solar-cell based on dye-sensitized colloidal TiO2 films. Nature 353:737–740. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Martin S, Garcia-Ybarra PL, Castillo JL (2010) Electrospray deposition of catalyst layers with ultra-low Pt loadings for PEM fuel cells cathodes. J Power Sources 195:2443–2449. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Şanlı LI, Yarar B, Bayram V, Gürsel SA (2017) Electrosprayed catalyst layers based on graphene–carbon black hybrids for the next-generation fuel cell electrodes. J Mater Sci 52:2091–2102. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jaworek A (2007) Electrospray droplet sources for thin film deposition. J Mater Sci 42:266–297. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chan BP, Leong KW (2008) Scaffolding in tissue engineering: general approaches and tissue-specific considerations. Eur Spine J 17:467–479. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hogan CJ, Biswas P (2008) Porous film deposition by electrohydrodynamic atomization of nanoparticle sols. Aerosol Sci Technol 42:75–85. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ni M, Leung MKH, Leung DYC, Sumathy K (2007) A review and recent developments in photocatalytic water-splitting using TiO2 for hydrogen production. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 11:401–425. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lui G, Liao J-Y, Duan A et al (2013) Graphene-wrapped hierarchical TiO2 nanoflower composites with enhanced photocatalytic performance. J Mater Chem A 1:12255–12262. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nakata K, Fujishima A (2012) TiO2 photocatalysis: design and applications. J Photochem Photobiol C Photochem Rev 13:169–189. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Haidry A, Schlosser P, Durina P et al (2011) Hydrogen gas sensors based on nanocrystalline TiO2 thin films. Open Phys 9:1351–1356. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Xi B, Verma LK, Li J et al (2012) TiO2 thin films prepared via adsorptive self-assembly for self-cleaning applications. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 4:1093–1102. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jaworek A, Sobczyk AT (2008) Electrospraying route to nanotechnology: an overview. J Electrostat 66:197–219. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jaworek A, Sobczyk AT, Krupa A (2018) Electrospray application to powder production and surface coating. J Aerosol Sci 125:57–92. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Brown NA, Zhu Y, German GK et al (2017) Electrospray deposit structure of nanoparticle suspensions. J Electrostat 90:67–73. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Xie J, Marijnissen JCM, Wang CH (2006) Microparticles developed by electrohydrodynamic atomization for the local delivery of anticancer drug to treat C6 glioma in vitro. Biomaterials 27:3321–3332. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Xie J, Lim LK, Phua Y et al (2006) Electrohydrodynamic atomization for biodegradable polymeric particle production. J Colloid Interface Sci 302:103–112. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Xie J, Jiang J, Davoodi P et al (2015) Electrohydrodynamic atomization: a two-decade effort to produce and process micro-/nanoparticulate materials. Chem Eng Sci 125:32–57. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lee H, Paik D-H, Jeong K-Y et al (2015) Fabrication of poly(methyl methacrylate) and TiO2 composite microspheres with controlled morphologies and porous structures by electrospraying. J Mater Sci 50:6531–6538. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Suhendi A, Nandiyanto ABD, Munir MM et al (2013) Self-assembly of colloidal nanoparticles inside charged droplets during spray-drying in the fabrication of nanostructured particles. Langmuir 29:13152–13161. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Castillo JL, Martin S, Rodriguez-Perez D et al (2018) Nanostructured porous coatings via electrospray atomization and deposition of nanoparticle suspensions. J Aerosol Sci 125:148–163. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Soliwoda K, Rosowski M, Tomaszewska E et al (2015) Electrospray deposition of gold nanoparticles from aqueous colloids on solid substrates. Colloids Surfaces A Physicochem Eng Asp 486:211–217. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Agostini P, Meffre A, Lacroix LM et al (2016) Electrospray deposition of isolated chemically synthesized magnetic nanoparticles. J Nanoparticle Res 18:1–10. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Tang J, Gomez A (2017) Controlled mesoporous film formation from the deposition of electrosprayed nanoparticles. Aerosol Sci Technol 51:755–765. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Rayleigh L (1882) XX. On the equilibrium of liquid conducting masses charged with electricity. Lond Edinb Dublin Philos Mag J Sci 14:184–186. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    de la Mora JF, Loscertales IG (1994) The current emitted by highly conducting Taylor cones. J Fluid Mech 260:155–184. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    de Juan L, de la Mora JF (1997) Charge and size distributions of electrospray drops. J Colloid Interface Sci 186:280–293. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Nemes P, Goyal S, Vertes A (2008) Conformational and noncovalent complexation changes in proteins during electrospray ionization. Anal Chem 80:387–395. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Rosell-Llompart J, Grifoll J, Loscertales IG (2018) Electrosprays in the cone-jet mode: from Taylor cone formation to spray development. J Aerosol Sci 125:2–31. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Cloupeau M, Prunet-Foch B (1990) Electrostatic spraying of liquids: main functioning modes. J Electrostat 25:165–184. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Smith JN, Flagan RC, Beauchamp JL (2002) Droplet evaporation and discharge dynamics in electrospray ionization. J Phys Chem A 106:9957–9967. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Verdoold S, Agostinho LLF, Yurteri CU, Marijnissen JCM (2014) A generic electrospray classification. J Aerosol Sci 67:87–103. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Bodnár E, Rosell-Llompart J (2013) Growth dynamics of granular films produced by electrospray. J Colloid Interface Sci 407:536–545. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Higuera FJ (2018) Structure of deposits formed from electrosprayed aggregates of nanoparticles. J Aerosol Sci 118:45–58. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Castillo JL, Martin S, Rodriguez-Perez D et al (2014) Morphology and nanostructure of granular materials built from nanoparticles. KONA Powder Part J 31:214–233. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Xi J, Zhang Q, Xie S et al (2011) Fabrication of TiO2 aggregates by electrospraying and their application in dye-sensitized solar cells. Nanosci Nanotechnol Lett 3:690–696. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Mills A, Lee S-K (2002) A web-based overview of semiconductor photochemistry-based current commercial applications. J Photochem Photobiol A Chem 152:233–247. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Hartman RPA, Brunner DJ, Camelot DMA et al (2000) Jet break-up in electrohydrodynamic atomization in the cone-jet mode. J Aerosol Sci 31:65–95. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Brown NA, Zhu Y, Li A et al (2017) Structure of electrospray printed deposits for short spray times. J Micro Nano Manuf 5:040906. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Rosell-Llompart J, Fernández de la Mora J (1994) Generation of monodisperse droplets 0.3 to 4 μm in diameter from electrified cone-jets of highly conducting and viscous liquids. J Aerosol Sci 25:1093–1119. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Dastourani H, Jahannama MR, Eslami-Majd A (2018) A physical insight into electrospray process in cone-jet mode: role of operating parameters. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 70:315–335. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Oh H, Kim K, Kim S (2008) Characterization of deposition patterns produced by twin-nozzle electrospray. J Aerosol Sci 39:801–813. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Wilhelm O, Mädler L, Pratsinis SE (2003) Electrospray evaporation and deposition. J Aerosol Sci 34:815–836. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Gibbons MJ, Robinson AJ (2018) Electrospray array heat transfer. Int J Therm Sci 129:451–461. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Lei L, Kovacevich DA, Nitzsche MP et al (2018) Obtaining thickness-limited electrospray deposition for 3D coating. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 10:11175–11188. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringState University of New York at BinghamtonBinghamtonUSA

Personalised recommendations