Advertisement

Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 54, Issue 8, pp 6393–6400 | Cite as

Structural evolution and electrical properties of metal ion-containing polydopamine

  • Haoqi Li
  • Tim Marshall
  • Yaroslav V. Aulin
  • Akila C. Thenuwara
  • Yao Zhao
  • Eric Borguet
  • Daniel R. Strongin
  • Fei RenEmail author
Electronic materials
  • 164 Downloads

Abstract

Polydopamine (PDA) is a biopolymer that can be synthesized under mild conditions. Thermal annealing can convert PDA into a conductive phase, the so-called carbonized PDA (cPDA). This work studied the effect of three metal ions, i.e., Cu2+, Mg2+, and Na+, on the synthesis of PDA and its conversion to cPDA. Both Cu2+ and Mg2+ could interact with PDA, which in turn influenced (1) the growth of PDA thin film, (2) morphology change of PDA particles upon thermal annealing, and (3) the electrical properties of heat-treated thin films. In contrast, the presence of Na+ ion during the synthesis of PDA did not show any effect. In this study, the morphology of PDA thin films and powder particles was examined using SEM and TEM; their chemical compositions were studied by EDS and ICP-MS; the structure was investigated using electron diffraction and Raman spectroscopy; and the properties were evaluated with respect to the electrical conductivity and thermoelectric Seebeck coefficient. The results from this work provide a potential approach to control the structure and properties of PDA and cPDA materials through metal ion doping.

Notes

Acknowledgements

H.L. and F.R. acknowledge the financial support from Temple University faculty start-up fund. The SEM imaging was performed in the CoE-NIC facility at Temple University, which is based on DoD DURIP Award N0014-12-1-0777 from the Office of Naval Research and is sponsored by the College of Engineering. E.B., T.M., and Y.A. acknowledge support as part of the Center for the Computational Design of Functional Layered Materials, an Energy Frontier Research Center funded by the US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences under Award #DE-SC0012575.

Authors’ Contribution

H.L. prepared samples and conducted experiments including SEM, AFM, TEM, XRD, TGA, and electrical conductivity and Seebeck coefficient measurements. T.M., Y.V.A., and E.B. conducted the Raman spectroscopy measurements and data analyses. A.T. and D. S. conducted the XPS experiments and provided data analyses. Y.Z. had helped in the experiment on TEM and had intensive discussion with H. L. F.R. designed and guided the project. All authors have contributed to the manuscript revision.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Supplementary material

10853_2019_3337_MOESM1_ESM.docx (1.3 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 1351 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Lee H, Dellatore SM, Miller WM, Messersmith PB (2007) Mussel-inspired surface chemistry for multifunctional coatings. Science 318:426–430.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1147241 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Li H et al (2017) Structure evolution and thermoeelctic properties of carbonized polydopamine thin films. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9:6655–6660.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acsmi.6b15601 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jiang X, Wang Y, Li M (2017) Selecting water-alcohol mixed solvent for synthesis of polydopamine nano-spheres using solubility parameter. Sci Rep 4:6070.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep06070 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chen Y, Zhao Y, Liang Z (2015) Solution processed organic thermoelectrics: towards flexible thermoelectric modules. Energy Environ Sci 8:401–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dreyer DR, Miller DJ, Freeman BD, Paul DR, Bielawski CW (2013) Perspectives on poly(dopamine). Chem Sci 4:3796–3802.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c3sc51501j CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Liu Y, Ai K, Lu L (2014) Polydopamine and its derivative materials: synthesis and promising applications in energy, environmental, and biomedical fields. Chem Rev 114:5057–5115.  https://doi.org/10.1021/cr400407a CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lynge ME, van der Westen R, Postma A, Stadler B (2011) Polydopamine-a nature-inspired polymer coating for biomedical science. Nanoscale 3:4916–4928.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c1nr10969c CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Brubaker CE, Messersmith PB (2012) The present and future of biologically inspired adhesive interfaces and materials. Langmuir 28:2200–2205.  https://doi.org/10.1021/la300044v CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Li R, Parvez K, Hinkel F, Feng X, Muellen K (2013) Bioinspired wafer-scale production of highly stretchable carbon films for transparent conductive electrodes. Angew Chem Int Ed 52:5535–5538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jia Z et al (2017) Electrical and mechanical properties of poly(dopamine)-modified copper/reduced graphene oxide composites. J Mater Sci 52:11620–11629.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-017-1307-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jia Z et al (2018) Preparation and electrical properties of sintered copper powder compacts modified by polydopamine-derived carbon nanofilms. J Mater Sci 53:6562–6573.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-018-2000-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zhao Y, Wang H, Qian B, Li H, Ren F (2018) Copper-polydopamine composite derived from bioinspired polymer coating. J Alloys Compd 742:191–198.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.01.183 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kong J et al (2012) Highly electrically conductive layered carbon derived from polydopamine and its functions in SnO2-based lithium ion battery anodes. Chem Commun 48:10316–10318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ai K, Liu Y, Ruan C, Lu L, Lu G (2013) Sp2 C-dominant Ndoped carbon sub-micrometer spheres with a tunable size a versatile platform for highly efficient oxygen-reduction catalysts. Adv Mater 25:998–1003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Im KM, Kim T, Jeon J (2017) Metal-chelation-assisted deposition of polydopamine on human hair: a ready-to-use eumelanin-based hair dyeing methodology. ACS Biomater Sci Eng 3:628–636.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.7600031 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kim S, Gim T, Kang S (2014) Stability-enhanced polydopamine coatings on solid substrates by iron(III) coordination. Prog Org Coat 77:1336–1339.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.porgcoat.2014.04.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Harding MM, Nowicki MW, Walkinshaw MD (2010) Metals in protein structures: a review of their principal features. Crystallogr Rev 16:247–302.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0889311X.2010.485616 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Flora SJS, Pachauri V (2010) Chelation in metal intoxication. Int J Environ Res Public Health 7:2745–2788.  https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph7072745 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Black BC, Huang HW, Cowan AJ (1994) Biological cooridnation chemistry of magnesium, sodium, and potassium ions. Protein and nucleotide binding sites. Coord Chem Rev 135/136:165–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Brewer DG, Wong PTT, Sears MC (1968) The nature of the coordination bond in metal complexes of substituted pyridine derivatives. III. 4-Methylpyridine complexes of some divalent transition metal ions. Can J Chem 46:3137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hong S et al (2012) Non-covalent self-assembly and covalent polymerization co-contribute to polydopamine formation. Adv Funct Mater 22:4711–4717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Vecchia NFD et al (2013) Building-block diversity in polydopamine underpins a multifunctional eumelanin-type platform tunable through a quinone control point. Adv Funct Mater 23:1331–1340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Vincent Crist B (2000) Handbook of monochromic xps spectra: the element of negative oxides. Wiley, New York. ISBN: 978-0-471-49265-8Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Huang H, Shih W, Lai C (2010) Nonpolar resistive switching in the Pt/MgO/Pt nonvolatile memory device. Appl Phys Lett 96:193505.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3429024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ferrari AC, Robertson J (2004) Raman spectroscopy of amorphous, nanostructured, diamond-like carbon, and nanodiamond. Philos Trans R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 362:2477–2512.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2004.1452 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ferrari AC (2007) Raman spectroscopy of graphene and graphite: disorder, electron-phonon coupling, doping and nonadiabatic effects. Solid State Commun 143:47–57.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssc.2007.03.052 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringTemple UniversityPhiladelphiaUSA
  2. 2.Department of ChemistryTemple UniversityPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations