Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 54, Issue 8, pp 6500–6514 | Cite as

Strong covalent interaction Fe2O3/nitrogen-doped porous carbon fiber hybrids as free-standing anodes for lithium-ion batteries

  • Weiyang Li
  • Fan Yang
  • Yichuan RuiEmail author
  • Bohejin TangEmail author
Energy materials


A simple and novel method that combines the electrospinning technology with nonaqueous sol–gel method is developed to incorporate Fe2O3 nanoparticles into ZIF-8-derived nitrogen-doped highly porous carbon fibers (NPCFs). The size of Fe2O3 nanoparticles is about 5 nm. The interfacial interaction between Fe2O3 and NPCFs is investigated by thermogravimetric analysis, Raman spectrum and X-ray photoelectron energy spectrum. We found that Fe2O3 nanoparticles are anchored strongly in the NPCFs through the Fe–O–C covalent bond. The impact of the Fe2O3 content in the composites on electrochemical performance is also studied. When served as the flexible and free-standing anode of lithium-ion batteries (LIBs), the Fe2O3/NPCFs-66.9% exhibits superior electrochemical performance with the high discharge capacity of 1351 mA h g−1 at 50 mA g−1, remarkable rate capability (337 mA h g−1 even at 5000 mA g−1), and stable cycling performance (1106 mA h g−1 after 100 cycles at 100 mA g−1). The excellent anodic property can be ascribed to the ultra-small size of Fe2O3 nanoparticles, and the one-dimensional (1D) structure combined with the excellent electrical conductivity of NPCFs matrix. Moreover, the robust interfacial interaction Fe–O–C bond can restrain the aggregation of Fe2O3 nanoparticles and accommodate the volume change. This can effectively maintain the integrity of the whole electrode during the long-term cycles. The results show that the composite may be considered as a promising anode material for advanced LIBs.



This work was financially supported by the Shanghai University of Engineering Science Innovation Fund for Graduate Students (17KY0405).

Supplementary material

10853_2019_3330_MOESM1_ESM.docx (548 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 548 kb)


  1. 1.
    Zhang Y, Zhao Y, Ren J, Weng W, Peng H (2016) Advances in wearable fiber-shaped lithium-ion batteries. Adv Mater 28:4524–4531. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nitta N, Wu F, Lee JT, Yushin G (2015) Li-ion battery materials: present and future. Mater Today 18:252–264. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Larcher D, Tarascon JM (2015) Towards greener and more sustainable batteries for electrical energy storage. Nat Chem 7:19–29. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ji L, Lin Z, Alcoutlabi M, Zhang X (2011) Recent developments in nanostructured anode materials for rechargeable lithium-ion batteries. Energy Environ Sci 4:2682–2699. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ji L, Rao M, Zheng H et al (2011) Graphene oxide as a Sulfur immobilizer in high performance lithium/sulfur cells. J Am Chem Soc 133:18522–18525. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Li W, Wu J, Chen Y, Wang X, Zhou R, Chen S, Guo Q, Hou H, Song Y (2015) Hollow Nitrogen-doped Fe3O4/Carbon nanocages with hierarchical porosities as anode materials for lithium-ion batteries. Electrochim Acta 186:50–57. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Keppeler M, Shen N, Nageswaran S, Srinivasan M (2016) Synthesis of α-Fe2O3/Carbon nanocomposites as high capacity electrodes for next generation lithium ion batteries: a review. J Mater Chem A 4:18223–18239. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Li J, Dahn HM, Krause LJ, Le D-B, Dahn JR (2008) Impact of binder choice on the performance of α-Fe2O3 as a negative electrode. J Electrochem Soc 155:A812–A816. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Larcher D, Masquelier C, Bonnin D et al (2003) Effect of particle size on lithium intercalation into α-Fe2O3. J Electrochem Soc 150:A133–A139. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Larcher D, Bonnin D, Cortes R, Rivals I, Personnaz L, Tarascon JM (2003) Combined XRD, EXAFS, and Mössbauer studies of the reduction by lithium of α-Fe2O3 with various particle sizes. J Electrochem Soc 150:A1643–A1650. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wang Z, Luan D, Madhavi S, Hu Y, Lou X (2012) Assembling carbon-coated α-Fe2O3hollow nanohorns on the CNT backbone for superior lithium storage capability. Energy Environ Sci 5:5252–5256. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Luo D, Lin F, Xiao W, Zhu W (2017) Synthesis and electrochemical performance of α-Fe2O3@carbon aerogel composite as an anode material for Li-ion batteries. Ceram Int 43:2051–2056. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ji L, Toprakci O, Alcoutlabi M et al (2012) α-Fe2O3 Nanoparticle-loaded carbon nanofibers as stable and high-capacity anodes for rechargeable lithium-ion batteries. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 4:2672–2679. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zhu J, Zhu T, Zhou X et al (2011) Facile synthesis of metal oxide/reduced graphene oxide hybrids with high lithium storage capacity and stable cyclability. Nanoscale 3:1084–1089. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Liu L, Yang X, Lv C et al (2016) Seaweed-derived route to Fe2O3 hollow nanoparticles/N-doped graphene aerogels with high lithium ion storage performance. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8:7047–7053. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Xiao W, Wang Z, Guo H et al (2013) Fe2O3 particles enwrapped by graphene with excellent cyclability and rate capability as anode materials for lithium ion batteries. Appl Surf Sci 266:148–154. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Niu Z, Chen J, Hng HH, Ma J, Chen X (2012) A leavening strategy to prepare reduced graphene oxide foams. Adv Mater 24:4144–4150. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wang X, Zhang M, Liu E et al (2016) Three-dimensional core-shell Fe2O3 @ carbon/carbon cloth as binder-free anode for the high-performance lithium-ion batteries. Appl Surf Sci 390:350–356. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Park Y, Oh M, Park JS et al (2015) Electrochemically deposited Fe2O3 nanorods on carbon nanofibers for free-standing anodes of lithium-ion batteries. Carbon 94:9–17. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zhang H, Zhou L, Noonan O, Martin DJ, Whittaker AK, Yu C (2014) Tailoring the void size of iron oxide@carbon yolk-shell structure for optimized lithium storage. Adv Funct Mater 24:4337–4342. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zhu Q, Xu Q (2014) Metal-organic framework composites. Chem Soc Rev 43:5468–5512. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sun X, Huang H, Wang C, Liu Y, Bu X (2014) Effective CoxSy HER electrocatalysts fabricated in situ sulfurating of metal-organic framework. ChemElectroChem. 5(23):3639–3644. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wu J, Song Y, Zhou R, Chen S, Li Z, Hou H, Wang L (2015) Zn–Fe–ZIF-derived porous ZnFe2O4/C@NCNTs nanocomposites as anode for lithium-ion batteries. J Mater Chem A 3:7793–7798. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Chen Y, Zheng L, Fu Y, Zhou R, Song Y, Chen S (2016) MOF-derived Fe3O4/carbon octahedral nanostructures with enhanced performance as anode materials for lithium-ion batteries. RSC Adv 6:85917–85923. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kong L, Zhu J, Shuang W, Bu X (2018) Nitrogen-doped wrinkled carbon foils derived from MOF nanosheets for superior sodium storage. Adv Energy Mater 8:1801515. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zhong M, He W, Wei S, Liu Y, Hu T, Bu X (2018) Metal-organic framework derived core-shell Co/Co3O4@N-C nanocomposites as high performance anode materials for lithium ion batteries. Inorg Chem 57:4620–4628. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Zhang C, Wang X, Liang Q et al (2016) Amorphous phosphorus/Nitrogen-doped graphene paper for ultrastable Sodium-ion batteries. Nano Lett 16:2054–2060. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Li W, Hu S, Luo X et al (2017) Confined amorphous red phosphorus in MOF-derived N-doped microporous carbon as a superior anode for sodium-ion battery. Adv Mater 29(16):1605820. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Han Y, Qi P, Li S et al (2014) A novel anode material derived from organic-coated ZIF-8 nanocomposites with high performance in lithium ion batteries. Chem Commun 50:8057–8060. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wang J, Wang G, Wang H (2015) Flexible free-standing Fe2O3/graphene/carbon nanotubes hybrid films as anode materials for high performance lithium-ion batteries. Electrochim Acta 182:192–201. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Yang D, Xu S, Dong S et al (2015) Facile synthesis of free-standing Fe2O3/carbon nanotube composite films as high-performance anodes for lithium-ion batteries. RSC Adv 5:106298–106306. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wang H, Yuan S, Ma D, Zhang X, Yan J (2015) Electrospun materials for lithium and sodium rechargeable batteries: from structure evolution to electrochemical performance. Energy Environ Sci 8:1660–1681. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Niederberger M (2007) Nonaqueous sol–gel routes to metal oxide nanoparticles. Acc Chem Res 40:793–800. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Gan Y, Xu F, Luo J et al (2016) One-pot biotemplate synthesis of FeS2 decorated Sulfur-doped carbon fiber as high capacity anode for lithium-ion batteries. Electrochim Acta 209:201–209. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Huang P, Tao W, Wu H et al (2017) N-doped coaxial CNTs@α-Fe2O3@C nanofibers as anode material for high performance lithium ion battery. J Energy Chem 27(5):1453–1460. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    D Yang, L K, M Zhong, J Zhu, and X Bu (2018) Metal–organic gel-derived FexOy/nitrogen-doped carbon films for enhanced lithium storage. Small 1804058.
  37. 37.
    Zhou G, Wang D, Yin L, Li N, Li F, Cheng H (2012) Oxygen bridges between NiO nanosheets and graphene for improvement of Lithium storage. ACS Nano 6:3214–3223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Dresselhaus MS, Jorio A, Hofmann M, Dresselhaus G, Saito R (2010) Perspectives on carbon nanotubes and graphene raman spectroscopy. Nano Lett 10:751–758. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Zhou J, Song H, Ma L, Chen X (2011) Magnetite/graphene nanosheet composites: interfacial interaction and its impact on the durable high-rate performance in lithium-ion batteries. RSC Adv 1:782–791. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Li Z, Tang B (2017) Mn3O4/nitrogen-doped porous carbon fiber hybrids involving multiple covalent interactions and open voids as flexible anodes for lithium-ion batteries. Green Chem 19:5862–5873. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Ma J, He Y, Zhang W et al (2015) An experimental insight into the advantages of in situ solvothermal route to construct 3D graphene-based anode materials for lithium-ion batteries. Nano Energy 16:235–246. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Delamar M, Combellas Catherine, Kanoufi Fre ´ric, Pinson Jean, Podvorica|´de Fetah I (2005) Spontaneous grafting of iron surfaces by reduction of aryldiazonium salts in acidic or neutral aqueous solution. Chem Mater 17:3968–3975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Nguyen T, Lee S (2017) Green synthesis of N-doped carbon modified iron oxides (N-Fe2O3@Carbon) using sustainable gelatin cross-linker for high performance Li-ion batteries. Electrochim Acta 248:37–45. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Guo H, Li T, Chen W et al (2014) General design of hollow porous CoFe2O4 nanocubes from metal–organic frameworks with extraordinary lithium storage. Nanoscale 6:15168–15174. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Wu H, Chen J, Hng H, Lou X (2012) Nanostructured metal oxide-based materials as advanced anodes for lithium-ion batteries. Nanoscale 4:2526–2542. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Guo W, Sun W, Lv L, Kong S, Wang Y (2017) Microwave-assisted morphology evolution of Fe-based metal-organic frameworks and their derived Fe2O3 nanostructures for li-ion storage. ACS Nano 11:4198–4205. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Gao G, Zhang Q, Wang K, Song H, Qiu P, Cui D (2013) Axial compressive α-Fe2O3 microdisks prepared from CSS template for potential anode materials of lithium ion batteries. Nano Energy 2:1010–1018. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Sun C, Chen S, Li Z (2018) Controllable synthesis of Fe2O3-carbon fiber composites via a facile sol–gel route as anode materials for lithium ion batteries. Appl Surf Sci 427:476–484. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Jia X, Chen J, Xu J et al (2012) Fe2O3 xerogel used as the anode material for lithium ion batteries with excellent electrochemical performance. Chem Comm 48:7410–7412. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Son M, Hong Y, Lee J, Kang Y (2013) One-pot synthesis of Fe2O3 yolk-shell particles with two, three, and four shells for application as an anode material in lithium-ion batteries. Nanoscale 5:11592–11597. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Ko Y, Park S, Jung K, Kang Y (2013) One-pot facile synthesis of ant-cave-structured metal oxide-carbon microballs by continuous process for use as anode materials in Li-ion batteries. Nano Lett 13:5462–5466. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Li W, Li Z, Yang F, Fang X, Tang B (2017) Synthesis and electrochemical performance of SnOx quantum dots@UiO-66 hybrid for lithium ion battery applications. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9:35030–35039. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Chemistry and Chemical EngineeringShanghai University of Engineering ScienceShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations