Advertisement

Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 54, Issue 5, pp 3960–3974 | Cite as

Experimental and molecular dynamics simulation study on the damping mechanism of C5 petroleum resin/chlorinated butyl rubber composites

  • Chao Yin
  • Xiuying Zhao
  • Jing Zhu
  • Haihua Hu
  • Meng Song
  • Sizhu Wu
Computation
  • 27 Downloads

Abstract

In this work, the damping mechanisms of C5 petroleum resin/chlorinated butyl rubber composites were studied by experimentation, molecular dynamics (MD) simulation, and statistical analysis. At the macro level, damping parameters, including glass transition temperature and effective damping temperature region, loss modulus, contact angle, relaxation time, and activation energy were obtained through dynamic mechanical thermal analysis, drop shape analysis, broadband dielectric relaxation spectroscopy, and differential scanning calorimetry. At the micro level, four intermolecular interaction parameters, including binding energy, fractional free volume, mean square radius of gyration, and mean square displacement, were calculated by MD simulation. The quantitative relationships between the damping and intermolecular interaction parameters were obtained by linear regression analysis. The results are expected to provide useful information for understanding damping mechanisms and a quantitative tool for predicting the damping properties of rubber composites.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51473012, 51873017, 51320105012 and 51603236).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Zhao X, Zhang G, Lu F, Zhang L, Wu S (2016) Molecular-level insight of hindered phenol AO-70/nitrile-butadiene rubber damping composites through a combination of a molecular dynamics simulation and experimental method. RSC Adv 6:85994–86005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Xia L, Li C, Zhang X, Wang J, Wu H, Guo S (2018) Effect of chain length of polyisobutylene oligomers on the molecular motion modes of butyl rubber: damping property. Polymer 141:70–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Li Q, Wang H, Yin P, Sun L, Wu C (2017) The mechanical properties of damping rubber reinforced by Wrap Knitted Spacer Fabric. Polym Compos.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.24534 Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Qu L, Huang G, Wu J, Tang Z (2007) Damping mechanism of chlorobutyl rubber and phenolic resin vulcanized blends. J Mater Sci 42:7256–7262.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-1466-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wu J, Huang G, Wang X, He X, Lei H (2011) Molecular dynamics in chlorinated butyl rubber containing organophilic montmorillonite nanoparticles. J Polym Res 18:2213–2220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fitzgerald ER, Grandine LD, Ferry JD (1953) Dynamic mechanical properties of polyisobutylene. J Appl Phys 24:650–655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Plazek DJ, Chay IC, Ngai KL, Roland CM (1995) Viscoelastic properties of polymers. 4. Thermorheological complexity of the softening dispersion in polyisobutylene. Macromolecules 28:6432–6436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wu J, Huang G, Wang X, He X, Zheng J (2011) Detecting different modes of molecular motion in polyisobutylene and chlorinated butyl rubber by using dielectric probes. Soft Matter 7:9224–9230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wang X, Huang G, Wu J, Nie Y, He X (2011) Using two-dimensional correlation dynamic mechanical spectroscopy to detect different modes of molecular motions in the glass-rubber transition region in polyisobutylene. J Phys Chem B 115:1775–1779CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zhang F, He G, Xu K, Wu H, Guo S (2015) The damping and flame-retardant properties of poly(vinyl chloride)/chlorinated butyl rubber multilayered composites. J Appl Polym Sci 132:41259Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Suresh KI, Sitaramam BS, Raju KVSN (2003) Effect of copolymer composition on the dynamic mechanical and thermal behaviour of butyl acrylate–acrylonitrile copolymers. Macromol Mater Eng 288:980–988CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wang YQ, Wang Y, Zhang HF, Zhang LQ (2006) A novel approach to prepare a gradient polymer with a wide damping temperature range by in-situ chemical modification of rubber during vulcanization. Macromol Rapid Commun 27:1162–1167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Niu X, Yang X, Brochu P, Stoyanov H, Yun S, Yu Z, Pei Q (2012) Bistable large-strain actuation of interpenetrating polymer networks. Adv Mater 24:6513–6519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zhu J, Zhao X, Liu L, Song M, Wu S (2018) Quantitative relationships between intermolecular interaction and damping parameters of irganox-1035/NBR hybrids: a combination of experiments, molecular dynamics simulations, and linear regression analyses. J Appl Polym Sci 135:46202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yang D, Zhao X, Chan T, Zhang L, Wu S (2016) Investigation of the damping properties of hindered phenol AO-80/polyacrylate hybrids using molecular dynamics simulations in combination with experimental methods. J Mater Sci 51:5760–5774.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-016-9878-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Taekhyeon K, Yirang S, Jaenyoung K (2003) Synthesis and properties of new polymer having hindered phenol antioxidants. B Korean Chem Soc 24:1853–1855CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wu C (2003) Interphase migration of a hindered phenol compound in acrylate rubber/chlorinated polypropylene blends. Polym J 35:286–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wu W, Li H, Yang S, Lai X, Fan H, Cai H, Zeng X (2017) Extraction resistance and mechanism of a macromolecular hindered phenol antioxidant in natural rubber. J Appl Polym Sci 134:44905Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Class JB, Chu SG (1985) The viscoelastic properties of rubber–resin blends. III. The effect of resin concentration. J Appl Polym Sci 30:825–842CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jin KK, Du YR, Lee KH (2000) The aromatic hydrocarbon resins with various hydrogenation degrees part 1. The phase behavior and miscibility with polybutadiene and with polystyrene. Polymer 41:5195–5205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Liang J, Chang S, Feng N (2013) Effect of C5 petroleum resin content on damping behavior, morphology, and mechanical properties of BIIR/BR vulcanizates. J Appl Polym Sci 130:510–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wu C, Wu G, Wu C (2010) Dynamic mechanical properties in blends of poly(styrene-b-isoprene-b-styrene) with aromatic hydrocarbon resin. J Appl Polym Sci 102:4157–4164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Li C, Xu S, Xiao F, Wu C (2006) Dynamic mechanical properties of chlorinated butyl rubber blends. Eur Polym J 42:2507–2514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Song M, Zhao X, Li Y, Hu S, Zhang L, Wu S (2014) Molecular dynamics simulations and microscopic analysis of the damping performance of hindered phenol AO-60/nitrile-butadiene rubber composites. RSC Adv 4:6719–6729CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bian C, Wang S, Liu Y, Su KH, Jing X (2016) The role of non-bond interactions in the glass transition of novolac-type phenolic resin: a molecular dynamics study. Ind Eng Che Res 55(35):9440–9451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Chantawansri TL, Yeh IC, Hsieh AJ (2015) Investigating the glass transition temperature at the atom-level in select model polyamides: a molecular dynamics study. Polymer 81:50–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Loya A, Ren G (2015) Molecular dynamics simulation study of rheological properties of CuO–water nanofluid. J Mater Sci 50:4075–4082.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-015-8963-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Witkowski A (2011) The Schrödinger group in molecular quantum mechanics: beyond the Born–Oppenheimer approximation. Mol Phys 109:2423–2432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Datta P, Genzer J (2016) “Grafting through” polymerization involving surface-bound monomers. J Polym Sci Pol Chem 54:263–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lang M, John A, Sommer JU (2016) Model simulations on network formation and swelling as obtained from cross-linking co-polymerization reactions. Polymer 82:138–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Mastan E, Xi L, Zhu S (2016) Factors affecting grafting density in surface-initiated ATRP: a simulation study. Macromol Theor Simul 25:220–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Davris T, Lyulin AV (2015) Coarse-grained molecular-dynamics simulations of capped crosslinked polymer films: equilibrium structure and glass-transition temperature. Polym Compos 36:1012–1019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Xu WS, Douglas JF, Freed KF (2016) Influence of cohesive energy on the thermodynamic properties of a model glass-forming polymer melt. Macromolecules 49:8341–8354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Qiao B, Zhao X, Yue D, Zhang L, Wu S (2012) A combined experiment and molecular dynamics simulation study of hydrogen bonds and free volume in nitrile-butadiene rubber/hindered phenol damping mixtures. J Mater Chem 22:12339–12348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Liu P, Lu J, Yu H, Ren N, Lockwood FE, Wang Q (2017) Lubricant shear thinning behavior correlated with variation of radius of gyration via molecular dynamics simulations. J Chem Phys 147:84904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Zheng W, Wu Y, Yang W, Zhang Z, Zhang L, Wu S (2017) A combined experimental and molecular simulation study of factors influencing the selection of antioxidants in butadiene rubber. J Phys Chem B 121:1413–1425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Wang W, Zou HK, Chu GW, Weng Z, Chen JF (2014) Bromination of butyl rubber in rotating packed bed reactor. Chem Eng J 240:503–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Bunte SW, Sun H (2000) Molecular modeling of energetic materials: the parameterization and validation of nitrate esters in the COMPASS force field. J Phys Chem B 104:2477–2489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Mcquaid MJ, Sun H, Rigby D (2004) Development and validation of COMPASS force field parameters for molecules with aliphatic azide chains. J Comput Chem 25:61–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Sun H (1993) Ab initio characterizations of molecular structures, conformation energies, and hydrogen-bonding properties for polyurethane hard segments. Macromolecules 26:5924–5936CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Riley ME, Coltrin ME, Diestler DJ (1988) A velocity reset method of simulating thermal motion and damping in gas-solid collisions. J Chem Phys 88:5934–5942CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Mazo MA, Manevitch LI, Gusarova EB, Shamaev MY, Berlin AA, Balabaev NK, Rutledge GC (2008) Molecular dynamics simulation of thermomechanical properties of montmorillonite crystal. 3. Montmorillonite crystals with PEO oligomer intercalates. J Phys Chem B 112:3597–3604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Kasahara K, Sakuraba S, Fukuda I (2018) Enhanced sampling of molecular dynamics simulations of a polyalanine octapeptide: effects of the periodic boundary conditions on peptide conformation. J Phys Chem B 122:3597–3604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Ma X, Zhu W, Xiao J, Xiao H (2008) Molecular dynamics study of the structure and performance of simple and double bases propellants. J Hazard Mater 156:201–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    And GAK, Friesner RA, And TR, Jorgensen WL (2001) Evaluation and reparametrization of the OPLS-AA force field for proteins via comparison with accurate quantum chemical calculations on peptides. J Phys Chem B 105:6474–6487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Jacobsohn LG, Serivalsatit K, Quarles CA, Ballato J (2015) Investigation of Er-doped Sc2O3 transparent ceramics by positron annihilation spectroscopy. J Mater Sci 50:3183–3188.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-015-8881-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Luo Y, Wang R, Wang W, Zhang L, Wu S (2017) Molecular dynamics simulation insight into two-component solubility parameters of graphene and thermodynamic compatibility of graphene and styrene butadiene rubber. J Phys Chem C 121:10163–10173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Wang Y, Wang W, Zhang Z, Xu L, Li P (2016) Study of the glass transition temperature and the mechanical properties of PET/modified silica nanocomposite by molecular dynamics simulation. Eur Polym J 75:36–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Qu L, Wang L, Xie X, Yu G, Bu S (2014) Contribution of silica–rubber interactions on the viscoelastic behaviors of modified solution polymerized styrene butadiene rubbers (M-S-SBRs) filled with silica. RSC Adv 4:64354–64363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Tang Z, Zhang L, Feng W, Guo B, Liu F, Jia D (2015) Rational design of graphene surface chemistry for high-performance rubber/graphene composites. Macromolecules 47:8663–8673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Ngai KL, Plazek DJ, Echeverría I (1996) Viscoelastic properties of amorphous polymers. 6. Local segmental contribution to the recoverable compliance of polymers. Macromolecules 29:7937–7942CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Zhang F, He G, Xu K, Wu H, Guo S (2014) The molecular dynamics of different relaxation modes in asymmetric chlorinated butyl rubber/petroleum resin blends. RSC Adv 4:20620–20625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Luo Y, Wang R, Zhao S, Chen Y, Su H, Zhang L, Chan T, Wu S (2016) Experimental study and molecular dynamics simulation of dynamic properties and interfacial bonding characteristics of graphene/solution-polymerized styrene-butadiene rubber composites. RSC Adv 6:58077–58087CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Ferreira CA, Serrano CLR, Kuyven PS (2011) Use of analysis of variance and linear regression as prediction tool for mechanical performance of SBR. Plast Rubber Compos 40:40–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Ventura FDF, Oliveira JD, Filho WDRP, Ribeiro MG (2012) GC-MS quantification of organophosphorous pesticides extracted from XAD-2 sorbent tube and foam patch matrices. Anal Methods 4:3666–3673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Gong Z, Gong J, Yan X, Gao S, Wang B (2011) Investigation of the effects of temperature and strain on the damping properties of polycarbonate/multiwalled carbon nanotube composites. J Phys Chem C 115:18468–18472CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Organic–Inorganic CompositesBeijing University of Chemical TechnologyBeijingPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Key Laboratory of Beijing City on Preparation and Processing of Novel Polymer MaterialsBeijing University of Chemical TechnologyBeijingPeople’s Republic of China
  3. 3.Pretrochemical Research InstitutePetroChinaLanzhouPeople’s Republic of China
  4. 4.School of Materials and Chemical EngineeringZhongyuan University of TechnologyZhengzhouPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations