Advertisement

Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 54, Issue 7, pp 5971–5987 | Cite as

EVOH in situ fibrillation and its effect of strengthening, toughening and hydrophilic modification on PVDF hollow fiber microfiltration membrane via TIPS process

  • Zhenyu CuiEmail author
  • Xiuxiu Tang
  • Wei Li
  • Haonan Liu
  • Jing Zhang
  • Hong Wang
  • Jianxin Li
Polymers

Abstract

In order to enhance the strength and overcome the poor antifouling capacity of poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF) membrane used in water treatment, herein, poly(ethylene-co-vinyl alcohol) (EVOH) was selected and the PVDF/EVOH blend hollow fiber microfiltration membrane was prepared via the thermally induced phase separation (TIPS) technique. The morphology for the pristine and blend membrane was compared, and the distribution of EVOH on outer surface and within matrix was explored. The fibrous-shaped EVOH enhanced the breaking strength of the membrane markedly (up to 13.63 MPa) due to the in situ fibrillation; especially, when the blend membrane was immersed into water, the internal plasticization of water molecular enhanced the toughness of the membrane and the elongation at break increased up to 86.39% compared with 27.63% for the corresponding dry membrane and 36.62% for the pristine membrane, respectively. The addition of EVOH introduced hydroxyl group into the bulk and thus endowed the membrane with a better hydrophilicity (the contact angle is as low as 43°) and higher pure water flux (up to 449.11 L m−2 h−1) compared with pristine PVDF membrane. Moreover, the blend membrane showed a better rejection of carbonic particle (nearly 100%) and higher flux recovery rate (up to 87.30%). The present investigation offers an effective and simple pattern to regulate microstructure and enhance mechanical strength, flux and hydrophilicity of the polymeric microfiltration membrane via the TIPS process for water treatment.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Nature Foundation of China (No. 21576209), Applied Basic Research and Advanced Technology Programs of Science and Technology Commission Foundation of Tianjin (No. 16PTSYJC00100) and the Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University (PCSIRT) of Ministry of Education of China (No. IRT-17R80).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

10853_2018_3281_MOESM1_ESM.doc (3.8 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 3870 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Yang X, He Y, Zeng GY, Zhan YQ, Pan Y et al (2016) Novel hydrophilic PVDF ultrafiltration membranes based on a ZrO2-multiwalled carbon nanotube hybrid for oil/water separation. J Mater Sci 51:8965–8976.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-016-0147-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kim JF, Kim JH, Lee YM, Drioli E (2016) Thermally induced phase separation and electrospinning methods for emerging membrane applications: a review. AIChE 62:461–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Elhaj A, Irgum K (2014) Monolithic space-filling porous materials from engineering plastics by thermally induced phase separation. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6(18):15653–15666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lloyd DR (1990) Microporous membrane formation via thermally induced phase separation. I. Solid-liquid phase separation. J Membr Sci 52(3):239–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Qin AW, Wu XL, Ma BM, Zhao XZ, He CJ (2014) Enhancing the antifouling property of poly(vinylidene fluoride)/SiO2 hybrid membrane through TIPS method. J Mater Sci 49(22):7797–7808.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-014-8490-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Xu Z, Wu T, Shi J, Wang W, Teng K (2016) Manipulating migration behavior of magnetic graphene oxide via magnetic field induced casting and phase separation toward high-performance hybrid ultrafiltration membranes. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8(28):18418–18429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Li Q, Bi QY, Zhou B, Wang XL (2012) Zwitterionic sulfobetaine-grafted poly (vinylidene fluoride) membrane surface with stably anti-protein-fouling performance via a two-step surface polymerization. Appl Surf Sci 258(10):4707–4717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Liang S, Kang Y, Tiraferri A, Giannelis EP (2013) Highly hydrophilic polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) ultrafiltration membranes via post fabrication grafting of surface-tailored silica nanoparticles. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 5(14):6694–6703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Qin A, Li X, Zhao X, Liu D (2015) Engineering a highly hydrophilic PVDF membrane via binding TiO2 nanoparticles and a PVA layer onto a membrane surface. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7(16):8427–8436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Woo SH, Lee JS, Lee HH, Park J (2015) Preparation method of crack-free PVDF microfiltration membrane with enhanced antifouling characteristics. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7(30):16466–16477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rajabzadeh S, Maruyama T, Ohmukai Y (2009) Preparation of PVDF/PMMA blend hollow fiber membrane via thermally induced phase separation (TIPS) method. Sep Purif Technol 66(1):76–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bhalani DV, Bera A, Chandel AK, Kumar SB (2017) Multifunctionalization of Poly(vinylidene fluoride)/reactive copolymer blend membranes for broad spectrum applications. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9(3):3102–3112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cui Z, Hassankiadeh NT, Lee SY, Lee JM (2013) Poly(vinylidene fluoride) membrane preparation with an environmental diluent via thermally induced phase separation. J Membr Sci 444:223–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ji GL, Zhu LP, Zhu BK (2008) Structure formation and characterization of PVDF hollow fiber membrane prepared via TIPS with diluent mixture. J Membr Sci 319:264–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ma T, Cui Z, Wu Y, Qin S, Wang H (2013) Preparation of PVDF based blend microporous membranes for lithium ion batteries by thermally induced phase separation: I. Effect of PMMA on the membrane formation process and the properties. J Membr Sci 444:213–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cheng Q, Cui Z, Li J, Qin S, Yan F, Li J (2014) Preparation and performance of polymer electrolyte based on poly(vinylidene fluoride)/polysulfone blend membrane via thermally induced phase separation process for lithium ion battery. J Power Sour 266:401–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wu Z, Cui Z, Li T, Qin S, He B (2017) Fabrication of PVDF-based blend membrane with a thin hydrophilic deposition layer and a network structure supporting layer via the thermally induced phase separation followed by non-solvent induced phase separation process. Appl Surf Sci 419:429–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wang B, Huang HX, Wang ZY (2015) Process-induced phase and crystal morphologies in water-assisted injection molded polypropylene/polymeric β-nucleating agent blend parts. Polym Eng Sci 55:1698–1705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Xia XC, Zhang QP, Wang L, Feng JM (2014) The complex crystalline structure of polyethylene/polycarbonate microfibril blends in a secondary flow field. Macromol Chem Phys 215:1146–1151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lv R, Zhou J, Du QG, Wang HT, Zhong W (2006) Preparation and characterization of EVOH/PVP membranes via thermally induced phase separation. J Membr Sci 281(1–2):700–706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wang G, Uyama H (2015) Reactive poly (ethylene-co-vinyl alcohol) monoliths with tunable pore morphology for enzyme immobilization. Colloid Polym Sci 293(8):2429–2435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bonyadi S, Mackley M (2012) The development of novel micro-capillary film membranes. J Membr Sci 389:137–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lima JAD, Felisberti MI (2010) Phase diagrams of poly(ethylene-co-vinyl alcohol) and dimethyl formamide solutions exhibiting both liquid-liquid and solid-liquid phase separation. J Appl Polym Sci 118:1787–1795Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lima JAD, Felisberti MI (2009) Porous polymer structures obtained via the TIPS process from EVOH/PMMA/DMF solutions. J Membr Sci 344(1–2):237–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zhou J, Zhang H, Wang H, Du Q (2009) Effect of cooling baths on EVOH microporous membrane structures in thermally induced phase separation. J Membr Sci 343(1–2):104–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wei CJ, Cheng Q, Lin LG, He ZF et al (2018) One-step fabrication of recyclable polyimide nanofiltration membranes with high selectivity and performance stability by a phase inversion-based process. J Mater Sci 53(15):11104–11115.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-018-2369-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Huang Y, Xiao CF, Huang QL, Liu HL, Hao JQ, Song L (2018) Magnetic field induced orderly arrangement of Fe3O4/GO composite particles for preparation of Fe3O4/GO/PVDF membrane. J Membr Sci 548:184–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Roy KJ, Anjali TV, Sujith A (2017) Asymmetric membranes based on poly(vinyl chloride): effect of molecular weight of additive and solvent power on the morphology and performance. J Mater Sci 52:5708–5725.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-017-0807-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Shang M, Matsuyama H, Maki T (2002) Preparation and characterization of Poly(ethylene co-vinyl alcohol) membranes via thermally induced liquid–liquid phase separation. J Appl Polym Sci 87(5):853–860CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Gupta S, Yuan X, Chung TCM (2014) Isothermal and non-isothermal crystallization kinetics of hydroxyl-functionalized polypropylene. Polymer 55(3):924–935CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Cui L, Sheng JB, Peng L, Tao YZ (2010) Effect of hydrogen bond on isothermal crystallization behavior of PA612/EVOH blend. Plastics 39(3):82–84Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Peng SX, Song XY, Ying JR (2000) Study on the improved ways and characteristics of EVOH resin. Plast Sci Technol 4:23–25Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lü X, Wang X, Guo L, Zhang Q (2016) Preparation of PU modified PVDF antifouling membrane and its hydrophilic performance. J Membr Sci 520:933–940CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ge C, Lei K, Aldi R (2015) Barrier, mechanical, and thermal properties of the three-layered co-extruded blown polyethylene/ethylene–vinyl alcohol/low density polyethylene film without tie layers. J Thermoplast Compos 30(6):794–807CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Li ZK, Lang WZ, Miao W, Yan X (2016) Preparation and properties of PVDF/SiO2@GO nanohybrid membranes via thermally induced phase separation method. J Membr Sci 511:151–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kucukpinar E, Doruker P (2004) Effect of absorbed water on oxygen transport in EVOH matrices. A molecular dynamics study. Polymer 45(10):3555–3564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Soto PJA, Fatyeyeva K, Chappey C, Marais S (2017) Layered Poly(ethylene-co-vinyl acetate)/Poly (ethylene-co-vinyl alcohol) membranes with enhanced water separation selectivity and performance. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9(7):6411–6423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Shang MX, Matsuyama H, Teramoto M, Lloyd DR (2003) Preparation and membrane performance of poly(ethylene-co-vinyl alcohol) hollow fiber membrane via thermally induced phase separation. Polymer 44(24):7441–7447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    An SL (2005) The practical textbook of membrane science and technology. Chemical Industry Press, Beijing, p 109Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Separation Membranes and Membrane Processes, National Center for International Joint Research on Separation Membranes, School of Material Science and EngineeringTianjin Polytechnic UniversityTianjinPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.School of Computer Science and Software EngineeringTianjin Polytechnic UniversityTianjinPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations