Advertisement

Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 54, Issue 6, pp 4884–4892 | Cite as

The effect of CuS counter electrodes for the CdS/CdSe quantum dot co-sensitized solar cells based on zinc titanium mixed metal oxides

  • Dong Liu
  • Jianqiang LiuEmail author
  • Jie Liu
  • Sha Liu
  • Chenglei Wang
  • Zhongwei Ge
  • Xiaotao Hao
  • Na Du
  • Hongdi Xiao
Energy materials
  • 143 Downloads

Abstract

The highly catalytic copper sulfide (CuS) thin films were designed and combined with the FTO substrates by the chemical bath deposition method and were used as counter electrodes (CEs) for the CdS/CdSe quantum dot-sensitized solar cells (QDSSCs) based on zinc titanium mixed metal oxides (MMOs) deriving from the layered double hydroxide precursor for the first time. Formation of CuS films was confirmed by X-ray diffraction and X-ray photon spectroscopy. The surface morphology of CuS films was observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Systemic electrochemical test was used to investigate the catalytic performance of CuS films and the photovoltaic performance of QDSSCs. When the number of deposition cycles (30 min per cycle) was two, the CuS CEs of excellent performance were obtained. The CuS CEs exhibited higher performance for QDSSCs based on ZnTi MMOs than the conventional platinum (Pt) CEs. The best power conversion efficiency of CdS/CdSe QDSSCs using optimal CuS CEs reached 3.95%, which is more than twice higher than that of Pt CEs.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 51372141, 11574181 and 61874067), the Key Research and Development Plan of Shandong Province, China (2018GGX102014, 2018GGX102024) and the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2017M610418).

References

  1. 1.
    Sharma D, Jha R, Kumar S (2016) Quantum dot sensitized solar cell: recent advances and future perspectives in photoanode. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 155:294–322.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2016.05.062 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yu J, Wang W, Pan Z, Du J, Ren Z, Xue W, Zhong X (2017) Quantum dot sensitized solar cells with efficiency over 12% based on tetraethyl orthosilicate additive in polysulfide electrolyte. J Mater Chem A 5(27):14124–14133.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c7ta04344a CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cao J, Zhu Y, Yang X, Chen Y, Li Y, Xiao H, Hou W, Liu J (2016) The promising photo anode of graphene/zinc titanium mixed metal oxides for the CdS quantum dot-sensitized solar cell. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 157:814–819.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2016.08.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tian J, Cao G (2016) Design, fabrication and modification of metal oxide semiconductor for improving conversion efficiency of excitonic solar cells. Coord Chem Rev 320–321:193–215.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2016.02.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tian J, Cao G (2015) Control of nanostructures and interfaces of metal oxide semiconductors for quantum-dots-sensitized solar cells. J Phys Chem Lett 6(10):1859–1869.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b00301 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Liu X, Song X, Zhang N, Ma P, Mo Z, Ding N, He T (2017) The influence of ZnO nanorod length and counter electrode material on the photovoltaic properties of CdS/CdSe quantum dots cosensitized zno nanorods solar cells. IEEE J Photovolt 7(6):1653–1662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zhou R, Zhang Q, Uchaker E, Yang L, Yin N, Chen Y, Yin M, Cao G (2014) Photoanodes with mesoporous TiO2 beads and nanoparticles for enhanced performance of CdS/CdSe quantum dot co-sensitized solar cells. Electrochim Acta 135:284–292.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2014.05.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lan Z, Wu W, Zhang S, Que L, Wu J (2016) Preparation of high-efficiency CdS quantum-dot-sensitized solar cells based on ordered TiO2 nanotube arrays. Ceram Int 42(7):8058–8065.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.02.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zhao D, Yang C-F (2016) Recent advances in the TiO2/CdS nanocomposite used for photocatalytic hydrogen production and quantum-dot-sensitized solar cells. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 54:1048–1059.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.100 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zhou R, Zhang Q, Uchaker E, Lan J, Yin M, Cao G (2014) Mesoporous TiO2 beads for high efficiency CdS/CdSe quantum dot co-sensitized solar cells. J Mater Chem A 2(8):2517–2525.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ta13460a CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pawar SA, Patil DS, Lokhande AC, Gang MG, Shin JC, Patil PS, Kim JH (2016) Chemical synthesis of CdS onto TiO2 nanorods for quantum dot sensitized solar cells. Opt Mater 58:46–50.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optmat.2016.05.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hou J, Zhao H, Huang F, Jing Q, Cao H, Wu Q, Peng S, Cao G (2016) High performance of Mn-doped CdSe quantum dot sensitized solar cells based on the vertical ZnO nanorod arrays. J Power Sour 325:438–445.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.06.070 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Torresan MF, Baruzzi AM, Iglesias RA (2016) Thermal annealing of photoanodes based on CdSe Qdots sensitized TiO2. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 155:202–208.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2016.06.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lee Y-L, Lo Y-S (2009) Highly efficient quantum-dot-sensitized solar cell based on co-sensitization of CdS/CdSe. Adv Funct Mater 19(4):604–609.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.200800940 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yu X-Y, Liao J-Y, Qiu K-Q, Kuang D-B, Su C-Y (2011) Dynamic study of highly efficient CdS/CdSe quantum dot-sensitized solar cells fabricated by electrodeposition. ACS Nano 5(12):9494–9500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zhou C, Geng Y, Chen Q, Xu J, Huang N, Gan Y, Zhou L (2016) A novel PbS/TiO2 composite counter electrode for CdS quantum dot-sensitized ZnO nanorods solar cells. Mater Lett 172:171–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jiao S, Wang J, Shen Q, Li Y, Zhong X (2016) Surface engineering of PbS quantum dot sensitized solar cells with a conversion efficiency exceeding 7%. J Mater Chem A 4(19):7214–7221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kokal RK, Deepa M, Kalluri A, Singh S, Macwan I, Patra PK, Gilarde J (2017) Solar cells with PbS quantum dot sensitized TiO 2–multiwalled carbon nanotube composites, sulfide-titania gel and tin sulfide coated C-fabric. Phys Chem Chem Phys 19(38):26330–26345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yang S, Zhao P, Zhao X, Qu L, Lai X (2015) InP and Sn: InP based quantum dot sensitized solar cells. J Mater Chem A 3(43):21922–21929.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c5ta04925c CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Chang JY, Chang SC, Tzing SH, Li CH (2014) Development of nonstoichiometric CuInS(2) as a light-harvesting photoanode and catalytic photocathode in a sensitized solar cell. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6(24):22272–22281.  https://doi.org/10.1021/am5061992 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Cai C, Zhai L, Wu Q, Ma Y, Zhang L, Yang Y, Zou C, Huang S (2017) Tailoring defects of CuInS2 quantum dots for sensitized solar cells. J Alloy Compd 719:227–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wang G, Wei H, Shi J, Xu Y, Wu H, Luo Y, Li D, Meng Q (2017) Significantly enhanced energy conversion efficiency of CuInS2 quantum dot sensitized solar cells by controlling surface defects. Nano Energy 35:17–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zhang H, Wang C, Peng W, Yang C, Zhong X (2016) Quantum dot sensitized solar cells with efficiency up to 8.7% based on heavily copper-deficient copper selenide counter electrode. Nano Energy 23:60–69.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.03.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gopi CV, Venkata-Haritha M, Ravi S, Thulasi-Varma CV, Kim S-K, Kim H-J (2015) Solution processed low-cost and highly electrocatalytic composite NiS/PbS nanostructures as a novel counter-electrode material for high-performance quantum dot-sensitized solar cells with improved stability. J Mater Chem C 3(48):12514–12528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Thulasi-Varma CV, Rao SS, Ikkurthi KD, Kim S-K, Kang T-S, Kim H-J (2015) Enhanced photovoltaic performance and morphological control of the PbS counter electrode grown on functionalized self-assembled nanocrystals for quantum-dot sensitized solar cells via cost-effective chemical bath deposition. J Mater Chem C 3(39):10195–10206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Cao J, Zhao Y, Zhu Y, Yang X, Shi P, Xiao H, Du N, Hou W, Qi G, Liu J (2017) Preparation and photovoltaic properties of CdS quantum dot-sensitized solar cell based on zinc tin mixed metal oxides. J Colloid Interface Sci 498:223–228.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2017.03.061 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Zhu Y, Wang D, Yang X, Liu S, Liu D, Liu J, Xiao H, Hao X, Liu J (2017) Investigation of the dye-sensitized solar cell designed by a series of mixed metal oxides based on ZnAl-layered double hydroxide. Appl Phys A 123(10):641–648.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-017-1256-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kim H-J, Ko B, Gopi CVVM, Venkata-Haritha M, Lee Y-S (2017) Facile synthesis of morphology dependent CuS nanoparticle thin film as a highly efficient counter electrode for quantum dot-sensitized solar cells. J Electroanal Chem 791:95–102.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2017.03.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Yuan B, Duan L, Gao Q, Zhang X, Li X, Yang Y, Chen L, Lü W (2018) Investigation of metal sulfide composites as counter electrodes for improved performance of quantum dot sensitized solar cells. Mater Res Bull 100:198–205.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.materresbull.2017.12.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hodes G, Manassen J, Cahen D (1980) Electrocatalytic electrodes for the polysulfide redox system. J Electrochem Soc 127(3):544–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Savariraj AD, Viswanathan KK, Prabakar K (2014) Influence of Cu vacancy on knit coir mat structured CuS as counter electrode for quantum dot sensitized solar cells. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6(22):19702–19709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sunesh CD, Gopi CV, Muthalif MPA, Kim H-J, Choe Y (2017) Improving the efficiency of quantum-dot-sensitized solar cells by optimizing the growth time of the CuS counter electrode. Appl Surf Sci 416:446–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Fang X, Ma T, Guan G, Akiyama M, Kida T, Abe E (2004) Effect of the thickness of the Pt film coated on a counter electrode on the performance of a dye-sensitized solar cell. J Electroanal Chem 570(2):257–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Muthalif MPA, Sunesh CD, Choe Y (2018) H3PO4 treated surface modified CuS counter electrodes with high electrocatalytic activity for enhancing photovoltaic performance of quantum dot-sensitized solar cells. Appl Surf Sci 440:1022–1026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Huang F, Hou J, Zhang Q, Wang Y, Massé RC, Peng S, Wang H, Liu J, Cao G (2016) Doubling the power conversion efficiency in CdS/CdSe quantum dot sensitized solar cells with a ZnSe passivation layer. Nano Energy 26:114–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Zhang X, Huang X, Yang Y, Wang S, Gong Y, Luo Y, Li D, Meng Q (2013) Investigation on new CuInS2/carbon composite counter electrodes for CdS/CdSe cosensitized solar cells. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 5(13):5954–5960CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of PhysicsShandong UniversityJinanPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.School of Physics and Electrical EngineeringKashgar UniversityKashgarPeople’s Republic of China
  3. 3.Key Laboratory of Colloid and Interface Chemistry (Ministry of Education)Shandong UniversityJinanPeople’s Republic of China
  4. 4.School of MicroelectronicsShandong UniversityJinanPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations