Advertisement

Polymer microsphere for water-soluble drug delivery via carbon dot-stabilizing W/O emulsion

  • Luyao Wang
  • Jianping Gao
  • Zhaolin An
  • Xiaoxiang Zhao
  • Hongduo Yao
  • Man Zhang
  • Qiang Tian
  • Xiangang Zhai
  • Yu Liu
Polymers
  • 15 Downloads

Abstract

Emulsions, usually oil-in-water emulsions, have been widely applied to the preparation of hydrophobic drug carriers. However, the synthesis of safe, biocompatible and high-performance carriers for water-soluble drugs remains a challenge. So polyacrylamide (PAM) microspheres stabilized by carbon dots (CDs) were fabricated via a water-in-oil Pickering emulsion without the use of any surfactant. The PAM/CD microspheres were spherical with an even distribution of the CDs on their surfaces. The size of the microspheres can be controlled by changing the amount of CDs, which also influenced the drug loading properties. The hydrophilic chemotherapy drug, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), was successfully loaded into the PAM/CD microspheres through incubation. The encapsulation efficiencies ranged from 68 to 82% with a maximum drug loading of 48%. The 5-FU release profiles depended on the concentration of the drug incubation solution, the concentration of the CD solution and the pH of the drug release environment. The release of 5-FU was relatively steady for the first 12 h and followed non-Fickian diffusion kinetics. This synthetic approach could be extrapolated to loading of other water-soluble drugs into hydrophilic polymers.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Science Foundation of China (51573126).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

10853_2018_3197_MOESM1_ESM.docx (1.4 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 1478 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Schmaljohann D (2006) Thermo- and pH-responsive polymers in drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 58:1655–1670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Biswal AK, Usmani M, Ahammad SZ, Saha S (2018) Unveiling the slow release behavior of hollow particles with prolonged antibacterial activity. J Mater Sci 53:5942–5957.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-018-1991-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gamboa JM, Leong KW (2013) In vitro and in vivo models for the study of oral delivery of nanoparticles. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 65:800–810CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Parthipan AK, Gupta N, Pandey K, Sharma B, Jacob J, Saha S (2018) One-step fabrication of bicompartmental microparticles as a dual drug delivery system for Parkinson’s disease management. J Mater Sci.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-018-2819-x Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kokil GR, Veedu RN, Le BT, Ramm GA, Parekh HS (2018) Self-assembling asymmetric peptide-dendrimer micelles—a platform for effective and versatile in vitro nucleic acid delivery. Sci Rep UK 8(4832):1–16Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yang KK, Kong M, Wei YN et al (2013) Folate-modified-chitosan-coated liposomes for tumor-targeted drug delivery. J Mater Sci 48:1717–1728.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-012-6930-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dai J, Lin S, Cheng D, Zou S, Shuai X (2011) Interlayer-crosslinked micelle with partially hydrated core showing reduction and pH dual sensitivity for pinpointed intracellular drug release. Angew Chem Int Edit 50:9404–9408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Weber S, Zimmer A, Pardeike J (2014) Solid lipid nanoparticles (SLN) and nanostructured lipid carriers (NLC) for pulmonary application: a review of the state of the art. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 86(1):7–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cheng R, Meng F, Deng C, Klok H, Zhong Z (2013) Dual and multi-stimuli responsive polymeric nanoparticles for programmed site-specific drug delivery. Biomaterials 34:3647–3657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Croissant J, Zink JI (2012) Nanovalve-controlled cargo release activated by plasmonic heating. J Am Chem Soc 134:7628–7631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Senol S, Akyol E (2018) Synthesis and characterization of hydrogels based on poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) for drug delivery under UV irradiation. J Mater Sci.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-018-2713-6 Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Abdul Hamid ZA, Tham CY, Ahmad Z (2018) Preparation and optimization of surface-engineered poly(lactic acid) microspheres as a drug delivery device. J Mater Sci 53:4745–4758.  https://doi.org/10.1002/vnl.21369 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dozie-Nwachukwu SO, Danyuo Y, Obayemi JD, Odusanya OS, Malatesta K, Soboyejo WO (2017) Extraction and encapsulation of prodigiosin in chitosan microspheres for targeted drug delivery. Mat Sci Eng C Mater 71:268–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Porter C, Trevaskis NL, Charman WN (2007) Lipids and lipid-based formulations: optimizing the oral delivery of lipophilic drugs. Nat Rev Drug Discov 6:231–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lupi FR, Gabriele D, Seta L, Baldino N, de Cindio B, Marino R (2015) Rheological investigation of pectin-based emulsion gels for pharmaceutical and cosmetic uses. Rheol Acta 54:41–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rahate AR, Nagarkar JM (2007) Emulsification of vegetable oils using a blend of nonionic surfactants for cosmetic applications. J Dispers Sci Technol 28:1077–1080CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chevalier Y, Bolzinger M (2013) Emulsions stabilized with solid nanoparticles: Pickering emulsions. Colloids Surf A 439:23–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zhang X, Hu X, Guan P, Zhang N, Li J, Du C (2011) Immunostimulating peptide interfacial imprinted magnetic microspheres synthesized via Pickering emulsion polymerization. J Mater Sci 52:4713–4726.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ma200837n CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dickinson E (2010) Food emulsions and foams: stabilization by particles. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci 15:40–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pang B, Liu H, Liu PW, Peng XW, Zhang K (2018) Water-in-oil Pickering emulsions stabilized by stearoylated microcrystalline cellulose. J Colloid Interface Sci 513:629–637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zou SW, Wang CY, Gao QX, Tong Z (2013) Surfactant-free multiple Pickering emulsions stabilized by combining hydrophobic and hydrophilic nanoparticles. J Dispers Sci Technol 34:173–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Yang Y, Wei Z, Wang C, Tong Z (2013) Versatile fabrication of nanocomposite microcapsules with controlled shell thickness and low permeability. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 5:2495–2502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Amalvy JI, Unali GF, Li Y, Granger-Bevan S, Armes SP, Binks BP et al (2004) Synthesis of sterically stabilized polystyrene latex particles using cationic block copolymers and macromonomers and their application as stimulus-responsive particulate emulsifiers for oil-in-water emulsions. Langmuir 20:4345–4354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Matos M, Laca A, Rea F, Iglesias O, Rayner M, Gutierrez G (2018) O/W emulsions stabilized by OSA-modified starch granules versus non-ionic surfactant: stability, rheological behaviour and resveratrol encapsulation. J Food Eng 222:207–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Eskandar NG, Simovic S, Prestidge CA (2007) Synergistic effect of silica nanoparticles and charged surfactants in the formation and stability of submicron oil-in-water emulsions. Phys Chem Chem Phys 9:6426–6434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Voorn DJ, Ming W, van Herk AM (2006) Polymer–clay nanocomposite latex particles by inverse pickering emulsion polymerization stabilized with hydrophobic montmorillonite platelets. Macromolecules 39:2137–2143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wang H, Hobbie EK (2003) Amphiphobic carbon nanotubes as macroemulsion surfactants. Langmuir 19:3091–3093CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hobbie EK, Bauer BJ, Stephens J et al (2005) Colloidal particles coated and stabilized by DNA-wrapped carbon nanotubes. Langmuir 23:10284–10287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hobbie EK, Fagan JA, Obrzut J, Hudson SD (2009) Microscale polymer-nanotube composites. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 1:1561–1566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Yang W, Zhang L, Guo Y et al (2016) Novel segregated-structure phase change materials composed of paraffin@graphene microencapsules with high latent heat and thermal conductivity. J Mater Sci 53:2566–2575.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144179 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    He Y, Wu F, Sun X, Li R, Guo Y, Li C et al (2013) Factors that affect Pickering emulsions stabilized by graphene oxide. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 5:4843–4855CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wang Y, Hu A (2014) Carbon quantum dots: synthesis, properties and applications. J Mater Chem C 2(34):6921–6939CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Nezhad-Mokhtari P, Arsalani N, Ghorbani M, Hamishehkar H (2018) Development of biocompatible fluorescent gelatin nanocarriers for cell imaging and anticancer drug targeting. J Mater Sci 53:10679–10691.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.5b05575 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Wang C, Wang C, Xu P, Li A, Chen Y, Zhuo K (2016) Synthesis of cellulose-derived carbon dots using acidic ionic liquid as a catalyst and its application for detection of Hg2+. J Mater Sci 51:861–867.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144179 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Li Q, Cui C, Meng H, Yu J (2014) Visible-light photocatalytic hydrogen production activity of ZnIn2S4 microspheres using carbon quantum dots and platinum as dual cocatalysts. Chem Asian J 9:1766–1770CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ding Y, Zhang F, Xu J, Miao Y, Yang Y, Liu X et al (2017) Synthesis of short-chain passivated carbon quantum dots as the light emitting layer towards electroluminescence. RSC Adv 7:28754–28762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Hou J, Yan J, Zhao Q, Li Y, Ding H, Ding L (2013) A novel one-pot route for large-scale preparation of highly photoluminescent carbon quantum dots powders. Nanoscale 5:9558–9561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Li R, Liu L, Zhu H, Li Z (2018) Synthesis of gold-palladium nanowaxberries/dodecylamine-functionalized graphene quantum dots-graphene micro-aerogel for voltammetric determination of peanut allergen Arah1. Anal Chim Acta 1008:38–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Lim SY, Shen W, Gao Z (2015) Carbon quantum dots and their applications. Chem Soc Rev 44:362–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Ritger PL, Peppas NA (1987) A simple equation for description of solute release I. Fickian and non-Fickian release from non-swellable devices in the form of slabs, spheres, cylinders or discs. J Control Release 5:23–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Guo X, Ji W, Wang C, Chen S (2016) Herbages-derived fluorescent carbon dots and CdTe/carbon ensembles for patterning. J Mater Sci 51(17):8108–8115.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s11671-016-1262-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Golemanov K, Tcholakova S, Kralchevsky PA, Ananthapadmanabhan KP, Lips A (2006) Latex-particle-stabilized emulsions of anti-Bancroft type. Langmuir 22:4968–4977CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Yang J, Gao J, Wang X, Mei S, Zhao R, Hao C et al (2017) Polyacrylamide hydrogel as a template in situ synthesis of CdS nanoparticles with high photocatalytic activity and photostability. J Nanopart Res 19(350):1–13Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Bach LG, Islam MR, Hong S, Lim KT (2013) A simple preparation of a STab. CdS-polyacrylamide nanocomposite: structure, thermal and optical properties. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 13:7707–7711CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Mu TC, Du JM, Li ZH, Liu ZM, Han BX, Wang JQ et al (2004) Preparation of polyacrylamide/CdS nanocomposites by a combination of reverse microemulsion and CO2 antisolvent techniques. Colloid Polym Sci 282:1179–1183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Orozco-Guareño E, Santiago-Gutiérrez F, Morán-Quiroz JL, Hernandez-Olmos SL, Soto V, Gomez-Salazar S et al (2010) Removal of Cu(II) ions from aqueous streams using poly(acrylic acid-co-acrylamide) hydrogels. J Colloid Interface Sci 349:583–593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Jin J, Zhu S, Song Y, Zhao H, Zhang Z, Guo Y et al (2016) Precisely controllable core–shell Ag@carbon dots nanoparticles: application to in situ super-sensitive monitoring of catalytic reactions. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8:27956–27965CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Lu S, Xiao G, Sui L, Feng T, Yong X, Zhu S et al (2017) Piezochromic carbon dots with two-photon fluorescence. Angew Chem Int Ed 56:6187–6191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Beamson G, Briggs D (1992) High resolution XPS of organic polymers: the scienta ESCA300 database. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Solomon Jones S, Sahatiya P, Badhulika S (2017) One step, high yield synthesis of amphiphilic carbon quantum dots derived from chia seeds: a solvatochromic study. N J Chem 41:13130–13139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Mewada A, Pandey S, Shinde S, Mishra N, Oza G, Thakur M et al (2013) Green synthesis of biocompatible carbon dots using aqueous extract of Trapa bispinosa peel. Mater Sci Eng C 33:2914–2917CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Wang D, Liu J, Chen J, Dai L (2016) Surface functionalization of carbon dots with polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane (POSS) for multifunctional applications. Adv Mater Interfaces 3(1500439):1–6Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Maaoui H, Teodoresu F, Wang Q, Pan G, Addad A, Chtourou R et al (2016) Non-enzymatic glucose sensing using carbon quantum dots decorated with copper oxide nanoparticles. Sens Basel 16(1720):1–10Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Chae A, Choi Y, Jo S, Nur’Aeni N, Paoprasert P, Park SY et al (2017) Microwave-assisted synthesis of fluorescent carbon quantum dots from an A2/B3 monomer set. RSC Adv 7:12663–12669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Thambiraj S, Ravi SD (2016) Green synthesis of highly fluorescent carbon quantum dots from sugarcane bagasse pulp. Appl Surf Sci 390:435–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Cheng F, An X, Zheng C, Cao S (2015) Green synthesis of fluorescent hydrophobic carbon quantum dots and their use for 2,4,6-trinitrophenol detection. RSC Adv 5:93360–93363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Zhao X, Li K, Zhao X, Pang D, Chen D (2008) Study on colon-specific 5-Fu pH-enzyme Di-dependent chitosan microspheres. Chem Pharm Bull 56:963–968CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Muvaffak A, Gürhan I, Hasirci N (2008) Cytotoxicity of 5-fluorouracil entrapped in gelatin microspheres. J Microencapsul 21:293–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Abulateefeh SR, Alkilany AM (2016) Synthesis and characterization of PLGA shell microcapsules containing aqueous cores prepared by internal phase separation. AAPS PharmSciTech 17:891–897CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Bravo SA, Lamas MC, Salamon CJ (2002) In-vitro studies of diclofenac sodium controlled-release from biopolymeric hydrophilic matrices. J Pharm Pharm Sci 5(3):213–219Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Tomić SL, Mićić MM, Filipović JM et al (2007) Swelling and drug release behavior of poly (2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate/itaconic acid) copolymeric hydrogels obtained by gamma irradiation. Radiat Phys Chem 76(5):801–810CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Martínez-Gómez F, Guerrero J, Matsuhiro B, Pavez J (2017) In vitro release of metformin hydrochloride from sodium alginate/polyvinyl alcohol hydrogels. Carbohydr Polym 155:182–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Mandal BB, Kapoor S, Kundu SC (2009) Silk fibroin/polyacrylamide semi-interpenetrating network hydrogels for controlled drug release. Biomaterials 30(14):2826–2836CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Su H, Jia Q, Shan S (2016) Synthesis and characterization of Schiff base contained dextran microgels in water-in-oil inverse microemulsion. Carbohydr Polym 152:156–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Chemistry, School of ScienceTianjin UniversityTianjinChina

Personalised recommendations