Can nanoparticle toughen fiber-reinforced thermosetting polymers?
- 36 Downloads
Many tougheners have been developed for thermosetting resins. Numerous studies indicate that the mode-I fracture toughness of a thermosetting resin (GIC_Resin) can be effectively enhanced by rubber tougheners such as liquid rubber and core–shell rubber, and inorganic rigid particles such as silica, clay, carbon nanotubes, or graphene. Can these additives also toughen fiber-reinforced polymers (FRPs)? In particular, can they improve the mode-I interlaminar fracture toughness of FRPs (GIC_Comp)? To answer how much toughness improvement is transferred from resin to FRPs, we reviewed data from more than 50 publications related to interlaminar toughening. The performance of various types of tougheners in the resin and/or FRPs is summarized, and toughening mechanisms are also discussed. We found a wide range of improvement in fracture toughness in FRPs with the addition of nanoparticles, from negative improvement in some silica and carbon particle studies to an improvement ratio equal to that achieved in the resin. Overall, rubber tougheners are the most effective tougheners, but on average, only about 30% of the relative improvement in resin toughness translated to GIC_Comp increase. The enhancement in GIC_Comp after incorporating rigid particles tougheners is even less, but rigid particles do not decrease the strength and modulus of the final FRPs. Other toughening strategies, such as using multiple types of tougheners, and coating or depositing nanoparticle onto the fiber reinforcements are also discussed, and we suggest some strategies to design FRPs with optimal delamination resistance.
This research was funded by Adama Materials. The authors thank the reviewers for helpful comments and Dr. Siyao He for his valuable discussions and guidance in this review.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
- 4.Hunston DL, Moulton RJ, Johnston NJ, Bascom W (1987) Matrix resin effects in composite delamination: mode I fracture aspects. In: Johnston NJ (ed) Toughened composites: symposium on toughened composites. ASTM International, Philadelphia, pp 77–94Google Scholar
- 16.Sober DJ (2007) Kaneka core–shell toughening systems for thermosetting resins. Kaneka Texas Corporation, HoustonGoogle Scholar
- 24.Collyer AA (2012) Rubber toughened engineering plastics. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
- 29.Kinloch A, Masania K, Taylor A, Sprenger S (2009) The fracture of nanosilica and rubber toughened epoxy fibre composites. In: Proceedings of ICCMGoogle Scholar
- 37.Eqra R, Janghorban K, Daneshmanesh H (2015) Mechanical properties and toughening mechanisms of epoxy/graphene nanocomposites. J Polym Eng 35:257–266Google Scholar
- 72.Balaguru PN, Nanni A, Giancaspro J (2009) FRP composites for reinforced and prestressed concrete structures: a guide to fundamentals and design for repair and retrofit. Taylor & Francis, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 73.Hyer MW, White SR (1998) Stress analysis of fiber-reinforced composite materials. WCB McGraw-Hill, BostonGoogle Scholar
- 75.Miller NA, Stirling CD (2001) Effects of ATBN rubber additions on the fracture toughness of unsaturated polyester resin. Polym Polym Compos 9:31–36Google Scholar
- 79.Schultheisz CR, McDonough WG, Kondagunta S, Schutte CL, Macturk KS, McAuliffe M, Hunston DL (1997) Effect of moisture on E-glass/epoxy interfacial and fiber strengths. In: Hopper SD (ed) Composite materials: testing and design, vol 13. ASTM International, Philadelphia, pp 257–286Google Scholar
- 85.Polaha JJ, Davidson BD, Hudson RC (1996) Effects of mode ratio, ply orientation and precracking on the delamination toughness of a laminated composite. Pieracci A 2:141–173Google Scholar