Advertisement

Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 54, Issue 6, pp 4589–4600 | Cite as

β-Mo2C/N, P-co-doped carbon as highly efficient catalyst for hydrogen evolution reaction

  • Jiabin Tan
  • Xiaobo He
  • Fengxiang YinEmail author
  • Xin LiangEmail author
  • Biaohua Chen
  • Guoru Li
  • Huaqiang Yin
Chemical routes to materials
  • 434 Downloads

Abstract

In this study, a β-Mo2C/N, P-co-doped carbon (NPC) catalyst with a porous structure of β-Mo2C nanoparticles loading on NPC matrix was prepared by vacuum-rotary evaporation and followed by a facile pyrolysis process for hydrogen evolution reaction (HER). The porous structure is beneficial for exposing more active sites and the mass transfer during the HER. In addition, the carbon matrixes with the highly doped N and P heteroatoms also provide their positive contributions to its high catalytic activity for HER. Owing to the advantages mentioned above, the optimized catalyst shows a small overpotential of 181 mV for driving a cathodic current density of 10 mA cm−2, a low Tafel slope of 65.3 mV dec−1 and a high exchange current density of 1.5 × 10−2 mA cm−2 during HER processes in acid electrolyte. The excellent performance of the β-Mo2C/NPC makes it a great potential candidate as the HER electrocatalyst.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project Nos. 21706010 and 21276018), the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province of China (Project No. BK20161200) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Project Nos. buctrc201526 and PYCC1706). Authors are specially thankful for the support from Advanced Catalysis and Green Manufacturing Collaborative Innovation Center, Changzhou University (Project Nos. ACGM2016-06-02 and ACGM2016-06-03).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

10853_2018_3190_MOESM1_ESM.docx (3.9 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 3945 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Dresselhaus MS, Thomas IL (2001) Alternative energy technologies. Nature 414:332–337Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Portney PR (2003) Energy resources and global development. Science 302:1528–1531Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Walter MG, Warren EL, McKone JR, Boettcher SW, Mi Q, Santori EA, Lewis NS (2010) Solar water splitting cells. Chem Rev 110:6446–6473Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Turner JA (2004) Sustainable hydrogen production. Science 305:972–974Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cook TR, Dogutan DK, Reece SY, Surendranath Y, Teets TS, Nocera DG (2010) Solar energy supply and storage for the legacy and nonlegacy worlds. Chem Rev 110:6474–6502Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Marc Koper TM (2013) Hydrogen electrocatalysis: a basic solution. Nat Chem 5:255–256Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Durst J, Siebel A, Simon C, Hasche F, Herranz J, Gasteiger HA (2014) New insights into the electrochemical hydrogen oxidation and evolution reaction mechanism. Energy Environ Sci 7:2255–2260Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zheng Y, Jiao Y, Zhu Y, Li LH, Han Y, Chen Y (2014) Hydrogen evolution by a metal-free electrocatalyst. Nat Commun 5:3783–3790Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hou J, Lei Y, Wang F, Ma X, Min S (2017) In-situ photochemical fabrication of transition metal-promoted amorphous molybdenum sulfide catalysts for enhanced photosensitized hydrogen evolution. Int J Hydrogen Energy 42:11118–11129Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Peters AW, Li Z, Farha OK, Hupp JT (2016) Toward inexpensive photocatalytic hydrogen evolution: a nickel sulfide catalyst supported on a high-stability metal-organic framework. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8:20675Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tuomi S, Guil-Lopez R, Kallio T (2016) Molybdenum carbide nanoparticles as a catalyst for the hydrogen evolution reaction and the effect of ph. J Catal 334:102–109Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bukola S, Merzougui B, Akinpelu A, Zeama M (2016) Cobalt and nitrogen co-doped tungsten carbide catalyst for oxygen reduction and hydrogen evolution reactions. Electrochim Acta 190:1113–1123Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ma Y, He Z, Wu Z, Zhang B, Zhang Y, Ding S (2017) Galvanic-replacement mediated synthesis of copper–nickel nitrides as electrocatalyst for hydrogen evolution reaction. J Mater Chem A 5:24850–24858Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Abghoui Y, Skúlason E (2017) Hydrogen evolution reaction catalyzed by transition-metal nitrides. J Phys Chem C 121:24036–24045Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zhou Z, Wei L, Wang Y, Karahan HE, Chen Z, Lei Y (2017) Hydrogen evolution reaction activity of nickel phosphide is highly sensitive to electrolyte ph. J Mater Chem A 5:20390–20397Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lin Y, Liu M, Pan Y, Zhang J (2017) Porous Co–Mo phosphide nanotubes: an efficient electrocatalyst for hydrogen evolution. J Mater Sci 52:1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-017-1204-5 Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Straistari T, Fize J, Shova SS, Reglier M, Artero V, Orio M (2016) A thiosemicarbazone-nickel(ii) complex as efficient electrocatalyst for hydrogen evolution. Chemcatchem 9:2262–2268Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Huang Y, Zhang B (2017) Active co-catalysts for photocatalytic hydrogen evolution derived from nickel or cobalt amine complexes. Angew Chem Int Ed 56:14804–14806Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Regmi YN, Wam C, Duffee KD, Leonard BM (2015) Nanocrystalline Mo2C as a bifunctional water splitting electrocatalyst. ChemCatChem 7:3911–3915Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zhu J, Yao Y, Chen Z, Zhang A, Zhou M, Guo J, Wu WD, Chen XD, Li Y, Wu Z (2018) Controllable synthesis of ordered mesoporous Mo2C@graphitic carbon core-shell nanowire arrays for efficient electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 10:18761–18770Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Guo J, Wang J, Xu C, Wu Z, Lei W, Zhu J, Xiao W, Wang D (2017) Molybdenum carbides embedded on carbon nanotubes for efficient hydrogen evolution reaction. J Electroanal Chem 801:7–13Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Pu Z, Wang M, Kou Z, Amiinu IS, Mu S (2016) Mo2C quantum dot embedded chitosan-derived nitrogen-doped carbon for efficient hydrogen evolution in a broad pH range. Chem Commun 52:12753–12756Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mir RA, Pandety OP (2018) Influence of graphitic/amorphous coated carbon on HER activity of low temperature synthesized β-Mo2C@C nanocomposites. Chem Eng J 348:1037–1048Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Long G, Wan K, Liu M, Liang Z, Piao J, Tsiakaras P (2017) Active sites and mechanism on nitrogen-doped carbon catalyst for hydrogen evolution reaction. J Catal 348:151–159Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lin Y, Zhang J, Pan Y, Liu Y (2017) Nickel phosphide nanoparticles decorated nitrogen and phosphorus co-doped porous carbon as efficient hybrid catalyst for hydrogen evolution. Appl Surf Sci 422:828–837Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kong X, Chen S, Zou Y, Lyu S, She X, Lu Y, Sun J, Zhang H, Yang D (2018) Cellulose nanocrystals (CNC) derived Mo2C@sulfur-doped carbon aerogels for hydrogen evolution. Int J Hydrogen Energy 43:13720–13726Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Jiao Y, Zheng Y, Davey K, Qiao SZ (2016) Activity origin and catalyst design principles for electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution on heteroatom-doped graphene. Nat Energy 1:16130Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Qu KG, Zheng Y, Jiao Y, Zhang XX, Dai S, Qiao SZ (2017) Polydopamine-inspired, dual heteroatom-doped carbon nanotubes for highly efficient overall water splitting. Adv Energy Mater 7:1602068Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Qu KG, Zheng Y, Zhang XX, Davey K, Dai S, Qiao SZ (2017) Promotion of electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution reaction on nitrogen-doped carbon nanosheets with secondary heteroatoms. ACS Nano 11:7293–7900Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wan C, Regmi YN, Leonard BM (2014) Multiple phases of molybdenum carbide as electrocatalysts for the hydrogen evolution reaction. Angew Chem Int Ed 53:6407–6410Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Mir RA, Sharma P, Pandey OP (2017) Thermal and structural studies of carbon coated Mo2C synthesized via in situ single step reduction carburization. Sci Rep 7:3518–3529Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Teghil R, De Bonis A, Galasso A, Sansone M, Rau JV, Santagata A (2012) Nanostructured molybdenum carbide thin films obtained by femtosecond pulsed laser deposition. Phys Status Solidi C 9:2370–2373Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Shen Y, Gong B (2015) Coupling Mo2C nanoparticles with graphite nanosheets as durable electrocatalysts for hydrogen evolution reaction. Angew Chem Int Ed 54:1–6Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Huang Y, Gong Q, Song X, Feng K, Nie K, Zhao F, Wang Y, Zeng M, Zhong J, Li Y (2016) Mo2C nanoparticles dispersed on hierarchical carbon microflowers for efficient electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution. ACS Nano 10:11337–11343Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wu JB, Lin ML, Cong X, Liu HN, Tan PH (2018) Raman spectroscopy of graphene-based materials and its applications in related devices. Chem Soc Rev 47:1822–1873Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Calizo I, Bejenari I, Rahman M, Liu G, Balandin AA (2009) Ultraviolet Raman microscopy of single and multiplayer graphene. J Appl Phys 106:043509Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Jing S, Zhang L, Luo L, Lu J, Yin S, Shen PK, Panagiotis T (2018) N-doped porous molybdenum carbide nanobelts as efficient catalysts for hydrogen evolution reaction. Appl Catal B 224:553–5450Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Dong J, Wu Q, Huang C, Yao W, Xu Q (2018) Cost effective Mo rich Mo2C electrocatalysts for the hydrogen evolution reaction. J Mater Chem A 6:10028–10035Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Mao Y, Li W, Sun X, Ma Y, Xia J, Zhao Y, Lu X, Gan J, Liu Z, Chen J, Liu P, Tong Y (2011) Room-temperature ferromagnetism in hierarchically branched MoO3 nanostructures. CrystEngComm 14:1419–1424Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Chen YY, Zhang Y, Jiang WJ, Zhang X, Dai Z, Wan LJ, Jin JS (2016) Pomegranate-like N,P-doped Mo2C@C nanospheres as highly active electrocatalysts for alkaline hydrogen evolution. ACS Nano 10:8851–8860Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Huang Y, Ge J, Hu J, Zhang J, Hao J, Wei Y (2017) Nitrogen-doped porous molybdenum carbide and phosphide hybrids on a carbon matrix as highly effective electrocatalysts for the hydrogen evolution reaction. Adv Energy Mater 8:1701601Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Zhang S, Xiao X, Lv T, Lv X, Liu B, Wei W, Liu J (2018) Cobalt encapsulated N-doped defect-rich carbon nanotube as pH universal hydrogen evolution electrocatalyst. Appl Surf Sci 446:10–17Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Ji J, Wang J, Teng X, Dong H, He X, Chen Z (2018) N, P-doped molybdenum carbide nanofibers for efficient hydrogen production. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 10:14632–14640Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Wang J, Lu H, Hong Q, Cao Y, Li X, Bai J (2017) Porous N,S-codoped carbon architectures with bimetallic sulphide nanoparticles encapsulated in graphitic layers: highly active and robust electrocatalysts for the oxygen reduction reaction in Al-air batteries. Chem Eng J 330:1342–1350Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Ann SH, Yu X, Manthiram A (2017) “Wiring” Fe-Nx-embedded porous carbon framework onto 1D nanotubes for efficient oxygen reduction reaction in alkaline and acidic media. Adv Mater 29:1606534Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Ojha K, Saha S, Kolev H, Kumar B, Ganguli AK (2016) Composites of graphene-Mo2C rods: highly active and stable electrocatalyst for hydrogen evolution reaction. Electrochim Acta 193:268–274Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    García G, Roca-Ayats M, Guillén-Villafuerte O, Rodríguez JL, Arévalo MC, Pastor E (2017) Electrochemical performance of α-Mo2C as catalyst for the hydrogen evolution reaction. J Electroanal Chem 793:235–241Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Zhou G, Yang Q, Guo X, Chen Y, Yang Q, Xu L, Sun D, Tang Y (2018) Coupling molybdenum carbide nanoparticles with N-doped carbon nanosheets as a high-efficiency electrocatalyst for hydrogen evolution reaction. Int J Hydrogen Energy 43:9326–9333Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Zou X, Zhang Y (2015) Noble metal-free hydrogen evolution catalysts for water splitting. Chem Soc Rev 44:5148–5180Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Li Z, Ma J, Zhou Y, Yin Z, Tang Y, Ma Y, Wang D (2018) Synthesis of sulfur-rich MoS2 nanoflowers for enhanced hydrogen evolution reaction performance. Electrochim Acta 283:306–312Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Liu Y, Yu G, Li GD, Sun Y, Asefa T, Chen W, Asefa T, Chen W, Zou X (2015) Coupling Mo2C with nitrogen-rich nanocarbon leads to efficient hydrogen-evolution electrocatalytic sites. Angew Chem Int Ed 54:10752–10757Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Wu Z, Wang J, Zhu J, Guo J, Xiao W, Xuan C, Lei W, Wang D (2017) Highly efficient and stable MoP-RGO nanoparticles as electrocatalysts for hydrogen evolution. Electrochim Acta 232:254–261Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Zhang Y, Wang Y, Jia S, Xu H, Zang J, Lu J, Xu X (2016) A hybrid of NiMo-Mo2C/C as non-noble metal electrocatalyst for hydrogen evolution reaction in an acidic solution. Electrochim Acta 222:747–754Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    McCrory CCL, Jung S, Ferrer IM, Chatman SM, Peters JC, Jaramillo TF (2015) Benchmarking hydrogen evolving reaction and oxygen evolving reaction electrocatalysts for solar water splitting devices. J Am Chem Soc 137:4347–4357Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Hu H, Tian M, Li F, Gao L, Xu N, Hu Y, Long X, Ma J, Jin J (2018) Phosphorus dual-doped moo2 nanosheets/multiwalled carbon nanotube hybrid as efficient electrocatalyst for hydrogen evolution. ChemElectroChem 5:2660–2665Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Huo L, Liu B, Zhang G, Zhang J (2016) Universal strategy to fabricate a two-dimensional layered mesoporous Mo2C electrocatalyst hybridized on graphene sheets with high activity and durability for hydrogen generation. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8:18107–18118Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Ma Y, Guan G, Hao X, Gao J, Abudula A (2017) Molybdenum carbide as alternative catalyst for hydrogen production—a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 75:1101–1129Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Liu Y, Huang B, Xie Z (2018) Hydrothermal synthesis of core-shell MoO2/α-Mo2C heterojunction as high performance electrocatalyst for hydrogen evolution reaction. Appl Surf Sci 427:693–701Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Lv CC, Huang ZP, Yang QP, Zhang C (2018) Nanocomposite of MoO2 and MoC loaded on porous carbon as an efficient electrocatalyst for hydrogen evolution reaction. Inorg Chem Front 5:446–453Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Jian C, Cai Q, Hong W, Li J, Liu W (2018) Edge-riched MoSe2/MoO2 hybrid electrocatalyst for efficient hydrogen evolution reaction. Small 14:1703798Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Li JS, Wang Y, Liu CH, Li SL, Wang YG, Dong LZ, Dai ZH, Li YF, Lan YQ (2016) Coupled molybdenum carbide and reduced graphene oxide electrocatalysts for efficient hydrogen evolution. Nat Commun 7:11204Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Yan D, Dou S, Tao L, Liu Z, Liu Z, Huo J, Wang S (2016) Electropolymerized supermolecule derived N,P co-doped carbon nanofiber networks as a highly efficient metal-free electrocatalyst for the hydrogen evolution reaction. J Mater Chem A 4:13726–13730Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Lin Y, Pan Y, Zhang J (2017) CoP nanorods decorated biomass derived N, P co-doped carbon flakes as an efficient hybrid catalyst for electrochemical hydrogen evolution. Electrochim Acta 232:561–569Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Chi JQ, Gao WK, Lin JH, Dong B, Yan KL, Qin JF, Liu B, Chai YM, Liu CG (2018) N, P dual-doped hollow carbon spheres supported MoS2 hybrid electrocatalyst for enhanced hydrogen evolution reaction. Catal Today.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2018.03.003 Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Chen J, Wei HM, Chen HJ, Yao WH, Lin HL, Han S (2018) N/P co-doped hierarchical porous carbon materials for superior performance supercapacitors. Electrochim Acta 271:49–57Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Zhuang M, Ou X, Dou Y, Zhang L, Zhang Q, Wu R, Ding Y, Shao M, Luo Z (2016) Polymer-embedded fabrication of Co2P nanoparticles encapsulated in N,P-doped graphene for hydrogen generation. Nano Lett 16:4691–4698Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Chemical EngineeringBeijing University of Chemical TechnologyBeijingPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Advanced Catalysis and Green Manufacturing Collaborative Innovation CenterChangzhou UniversityChangzhouPeople’s Republic of China
  3. 3.Changzhou Institute of Advanced MaterialsBeijing University of Chemical TechnologyChangzhouPeople’s Republic of China
  4. 4.Institute of Nuclear and New Energy Technology, Key Laboratory of Advanced Reactor Engineering and Safety of Ministry of EducationTsinghua UniversityBeijingPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations