Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 52, Issue 16, pp 9262–9268 | Cite as

Systematic investigation and in vitro biocompatibility studies on implantable magnetic nanocomposites for hyperthermia treatment of osteoarthritic knee joints

  • S. Mohapatra
  • R. Mishra
  • P. Roy
  • K. L. Yadav
  • S. SatapathiEmail author


The inefficacy of the currently used treatment modalities for osteoarthritis has elicited considerable research interest in the exploration of alternative methods. Hyperthermia treatment, generally used in the case of lesions, maybe considered as a viable solution owing to the economic and ergonomic factors involved. In the present study, Cr-doped Fe2O3 embedded in PVDF matrix is proposed as the biocompatible magnetic-dielectric composite to provide thermo-regulated prolonged treatment. A systematic study was carried out to characterize the physical properties of the prepared formulation. Further, cellular uptake studies were done to ensure bioviability. Finite element method studies using COMSOL were used to simulate the hyperthermia treatment of osteoarthritic knee joint. The approach proposed here may be used further to develop a novel class of therapeutic devices for the treatment of osteoarthritis.


Fe2O3 Nanoparticles Magnetic Composite Hyperthermia Treatment Nitrate Nonahydrate Prepared Formulation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



The authors would like to acknowledge Dr. Shabina Khanam, Chemical Engineering Department, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee for assisting in the usage of COMSOL. SS like to acknowledge Prof. Max Shtein from University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA for useful discussion. For financial support, authors would like to thank Sponsored Research and Industrial Consultancy, IIT Roorkee under Grant SRIC-CONSL-000-414 dt. 09.09.2015. SS like to acknowledge Faculty Initiation Grant from IIT Roorkee.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

All authors would like to declare no conflicts of interest.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material 1 (AVI 64535 kb)


  1. 1.
    Moskowitz RW (2007) Osteoarthritis: diagnosis and medical/surgical management. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Altman R et al (1986) Development of criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis: classification of osteoarthritis of the knee. Arthritis Rheum 29:1039–1049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Felson DT et al (1987) The prevalence of knee osteoarthritis in the elderly: the Framingham Osteoarthritis Study. Arthritis Rheumatol 30:914–918CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Weigl M et al (2003) Linking osteoarthritis-specific health-status measures to the international classification of functioning, disability, and health (ICF). Osteoar Cartil 11:519–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Felson DT (1987) Epidemiology of hip and knee osteoarthritis. Epidemiol Rev 10:1–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Isaac S et al (2015) Efficacy and safety of intra-articular injections of sodium hyaluronate and methyl prednisolone in treatment of osteoarthritis patients. J Pharm Res, pp 67Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hunter D (2014) Treatment of osteoarthritis, atlas of osteoarthritis. Springer Healthcare Ltd., New York, pp 83–100Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ekman EF et al (2014) Efficacy and safety of intravenous tanezumab for the symptomatic treatment of osteoarthritis: 2 randomized controlled trials versus naproxen. J Rheumatol 41:2249–2259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Byers et al (2014) Intra-articular formulations and methods for treatment of osteoarthritis. U.S. Patent Application 14/554,689Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Reginster JY (2015) Glucosamine and chondroitin salts in the management of osteoarthritis in Europe. Osteoporos Int 26:S60–S61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hochberg MC et al (2015) Combined chondroitin sulfate and glucosamine for painful knee osteoarthritis: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority trial versus celecoxib. Ann Rheum Dis 75:37–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Delafuente JC (2000) Glucosamine in the treatment of osteoarthritis. Rheum Dis Clin N Am 26:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Haghniaz R et al (2015) Temperature-dependent and time-dependent effects of hyperthermia mediated by dextran-coated La0.7Sr0.3MnO3. In vitro studies. Int J Nanomed 10:1609–1623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bae Seongtae et al (2006) Applications of NiFe2O4 nanoparticles for a hyperthermia agent in biomedicine. Appl Phys Lett 89:252503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jeun Minhong et al (2012) Physical limits of pure superparamagnetic Fe3O-4 nanoparticles for a local hyperthermia agent in nanomedicine. Appl Phys Lett 100:092406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kita Eiji et al (2010) Heating characteristics of ferromagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles for magnetic hyperthermia. J Appl Phys 107:09B321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Riaz Saira, Akbar Aseya, Naseem Shahzad (2014) Ferromagnetic effects in Cr-doped Fe2O3 thin films. IEEE Trans Magn 50:1–4Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ribeiro Clarisse et al (2015) Piezoelectric polymers as biomaterials for tissue engineering applications. Colloids Surf B 136:46–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ribeiro Clarisse et al (2016) Proving the suitability of magnetoelectric stimuli for tissue engineering applications. Colloids Surf B 140:430–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Prabhakaran T, Hemalatha J (2016) Magnetoelectric investigations on poly (vinylidene fluoride)/NiFe2O4 flexible films fabricated through a solution casting method. RSC Adv 6(90):86880–86888CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Martins Pedro et al (2016) Improved magnetodielectric coefficient on polymer based composites through enhanced indirect magnetoelectric coupling. Appl Phys Lett 109(11):112905CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Martins Pedro et al (2015) Tailored magnetic and magnetoelectric responses of polymer-based composites. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7(27):15017–15022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mosmann T (1983) Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. J Immunol Methods 65:55–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kasibhatla S et al (2006) Acridine orange/ethidium bromide (AO/EB) staining to detect apoptosis. CSH Protoc. doi: 10.1101/pdb.prot4493 Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kan-Dapaah K et al (2014) Implantable magnetic nanocomposites for the localized treatment of breast cancer. J Appl Phys 116:233505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Duck FA (1990) Physical properties of tissue: A comprehensive reference book. Academic Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Carrey J et al (2011) Simple models for dynamic hysteresis loop calculations of magnetic single-domain nanoparticles: application to magnetic hyperthermia optimization. J Appl Phys 109:083921CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Pennes HH (1948) Analysis of tissue and arterial blood temperatures in the resting human forearm. J Appl Physiol 1:93–122Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kittel C (2005) Introduction to solid state physics. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sapareto SA et al (1984) Thermal dose determination in cancer therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 10:787–800CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Metallurgical and Materials Engineering DepartmentIndian Institute of Technology RoorkeeRoorkeeIndia
  2. 2.Department of BiotechnologyIndian Institute of Technology RoorkeeRoorkeeIndia
  3. 3.Department of PhysicsIndian Institute of Technology RoorkeeRoorkeeIndia

Personalised recommendations