Advertisement

Strain distribution during tensile deformation of nanostructured aluminum samples

  • 360 Accesses

  • 6 Citations

Abstract

To optimize the mechanical properties, especially formability, post-process deformation by cold rolling in the range 5–50 % reduction was applied to aluminum sheets produced by accumulative roll bonding to an equivalent strain of 4.8. During tensile testing high resolution maps of the strain distribution over the tensile sample gage length were obtained in situ using a commercial ARAMIS system. Significant improvements in total elongation from 6 to 13.3 % and in post-UTS uniform elongation from zero to 4.4 % were observed when introducing a post-process deformation step and the observations were underpinned by the in situ observations of the evolution of strain distribution in the sample during tensile straining. The mechanisms responsible for the enhancement were discussed based on strain rate sensitivity measurements and microstructural observations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant unlimited access to the full article PDF.

US$ 39.95

Price includes VAT for USA

Subscribe to journal

Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.

US$ 199

This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

References

  1. 1.

    Meyers MA, Mishra A, Benson DJ (2006) Prog Mater Sci 51:427

  2. 2.

    Zhao YH, Zhu YT, Liao XZ, Horita Z, Langdon TG (2006) Appl Phys Lett 89:12106

  3. 3.

    Tsuji N, Ito Y, Saito Y, Minamino Y (2002) Scr Mater 47:893

  4. 4.

    Kamikawa N, Huang X, Tsuji N, Hansen N (2009) Acta Mater 57:4198

  5. 5.

    Yu C, Kao P, Chang C (2005) Acta Mater 53:4019

  6. 6.

    Huang X, Hansen N, Tsuji N (2006) Science 312:249

  7. 7.

    Huang X, Kamikawa N, Hansen N (2008) J Mater Sci 43:7397. doi:10.1007/s10853-008-2873-x

  8. 8.

    Huang X, Kamikawa N, Hansen N (2010) J Mater Sci 45:4761. doi:10.1007/s10853-010-4521-5

  9. 9.

    Tsuji N, Saito Y, Lee SH, Minamino Y (2003) Adv Eng Mater 5:338

  10. 10.

    Hoffmann H, Hong S (2006) CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 55:263

  11. 11.

    Hoffmann H, Vogl C (2003) CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 52:217

  12. 12.

    Hogström P, Ringsberg J, Johnson E (2009) Int J Impact Eng 36:1194

  13. 13.

    Ehlers S, Varsta P (2009) Thin-Walled Struct 47:1203

  14. 14.

    Winther G, Huang X, Godfrey A, Hansen N (2004) Acta Mater 52:4437

  15. 15.

    Hughes DA, Hansen N (2000) Acta Mater 48:2985

  16. 16.

    Liu Q, Huang X, Lloyd DJ, Hansen N (2002) Acta Mater 53:3789

  17. 17.

    Höppel H, Staud D, Merklein M, Geiger M, Göken M (2008) Adv Eng Mater 10:1101

  18. 18.

    Hyoung-Wook K, Suk-Bong K, Nobuhiro T, Yoritoshi M (2005) Acta Mater 53:1737

  19. 19.

    Wei Q (2007) J Mater Sci 42:1709. doi:10.1007/s10853-006-0700-9

  20. 20.

    Kidmose J, Cai DY, Hansen N, Winther G, Huang X (2010) In: Risø international symposium 31:297–302

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the support from the Danish National Research Foundation and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 50911130230) for the Danish-Chinese Center for Nanometals within which this work was performed. JK and LL gratefully acknowledge Yang Le and Jinglong Wen for their technical help with the ARAMIS experiments at Shenyang National Laboratory for Materials Science, Institute of Metal Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences.

Author information

Correspondence to J. Kidmose.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (AVI 3132 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (AVI 6344 kb)

Supplementary material 1 (AVI 3132 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (AVI 6344 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kidmose, J., Lu, L., Winther, G. et al. Strain distribution during tensile deformation of nanostructured aluminum samples. J Mater Sci 47, 7901–7907 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-012-6718-2

Download citation

Keywords

  • Cold Rolling
  • Strain Distribution
  • Strain Rate Sensitivity
  • Accumulative Roll Bonding
  • Total Elongation