Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of additions of Zr, Ti–B, Sr, and Si as well as of mold temperature on the hot-tearing susceptibility of an experimental Al–2% Cu–1% Si alloy

  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study was undertaken to investigate the effects of chemical composition and mold temperature (MT) on the hot-tearing susceptibility (HTS) of an experimental Al–2% Cu–1% Si alloy using a constrained rod casting mold. The HTS results were then compared with 206 (Al–5 wt% Cu) alloys containing the same additions. In general, the Al–2% Cu–1% Si based alloys exhibited higher resistance to hot-tearing than did the 206-based alloys. It was found that an elevated MT is beneficial in reducing the HTS of the Al–2% Cu–1% Si and 206 alloys in that the HTS value decreased from over 21 to less than 5, as the MT was increased from 250 to 450 °C. Increasing the Si content reduced the HTS of the Al–2% Cu–1% Si alloy considerably; this reduction may be attributed to an increase in the volume fraction of eutectic in the structure. The addition of Sr caused deterioration in the hot-tearing resistance of the base alloy due to the formation of Sr-oxides and an extension of the freezing range of the alloy. The refinement of the grain structure obtained with the Zr–Ti–B addition decreased the severity of hot-tearing as a result of an increase in the number of intergranular liquid films per unit volume and a delay in reaching the coherency point. It was also observed that α-Fe intermetallic particles may impede the propagation of hot-tearing cracks. The Al–2% Cu–1% Si alloy with 1 wt% Si addition was judged to be the best composition in view of its low HTS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lees DCG (1946) J Inst Met 72:343

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Clyne TW, Davies GJ (1975) Br Foundrym 68:238

    Google Scholar 

  3. Warrington D, McCartney DG (1991) Cast Met 3:202

    Google Scholar 

  4. Eskin DG, Suyitno, Mooney JF, Katgerman L (2004) Metall Mater Trans A 35:1325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Clyne TW, Davies GJ (1977) Proc int conf. University of Sheffield, Sheffield, p 275

  6. Yan X, Lin JC (2006) Metall Mater Trans 37B:913

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Suyitno, Eskin DG, Savran VI, Katgerman L (2004) Metall Mater Trans 35A:3551

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Viano D, St. John D, Grandfield J, Cáceres C (2005) Light metals: proceedings of the technical sessions presented by TMS Aluminum Committee at 134th annual meeting, p 1069

  9. Spittle JA, Cushway AA (1983) Met Technol 10:6

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Singer ARE, Jennings PH (1947) J Inst Met 73:197

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jennings PH, Singer ARE, Pumphrey WI (1947) J Inst Met 74:227

    Google Scholar 

  12. Pellini WS (1952) Foundry 80:125

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pellini WS, Bishop HF, Ackerlind CG (1952) Trans Am Foundrym Soc 60:818

    Google Scholar 

  14. Li S (Apr 2010) PhD Thesis. Worcester Polytechnic Institute, p 43

  15. Eskin DG, Katgerman L (2007) Metall Mater Trans 38A:1511

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Lu L, Dahle AK, St. John D (2007) Light metals: proceedings of the technical sessions presented by TMS Aluminum Committee at 136th annual meeting. The Minerals, Metals and Materials Society, Warrendale, p 721

  17. Arnberg L, Bäckerud L, Dahle A (1999) AFS Research Report. American Foundrymen’s Society, Des Plaines, p 111

  18. Briggs CW (1956) The metallurgy of steel casting. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  19. Campbell J (2006) Mater Sci Technol 22:127

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kim J, Choi J, Lee C, Yoon E (2000) J Mater Sci Lett 19:1395

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Anson JP, Drew RAL, Gruzleski JE (1999) Metall Mater Trans 30B:1027

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kelly MJ, Stoloff NS (1975) Metall Mater Trans 6A:159

    Google Scholar 

  23. Metz SA, Flemings MC (1970) Trans Am Foundrym Soc 78:453

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lin S, Aliravci C, Pekguleryuz MO (2007) Metall Mater Trans 38A:1056

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Lu L, Dahle AK (2005) Metall Mater Trans 36A:819

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Couture A (1981) AFS Int Cast Met J 6:9

    Google Scholar 

  27. Nagaumi H, Suzuki S, Okane T, Umeda T (2006) Mater Trans 47:2821

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Chen CL, Richter A, Thomson RC (2009) Intermetallics 17:634

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Financial support received from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) and from General Motors Powertrain Group is hereby gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. M. Nabawy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nabawy, A.M., Samuel, A.M., Samuel, F.H. et al. Influence of additions of Zr, Ti–B, Sr, and Si as well as of mold temperature on the hot-tearing susceptibility of an experimental Al–2% Cu–1% Si alloy. J Mater Sci 47, 4146–4158 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-012-6269-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-012-6269-6

Keywords

Navigation