Advertisement

Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 46, Issue 18, pp 6158–6161 | Cite as

Comments on “Model and analysis of size-stiffening in nanoporous cellular solids” by Wang and Lam [J. Mater. Sci. 44, 985–991 (2009)]

  • Harm AskesEmail author
  • Elias C. Aifantis
Letter

Introduction

The mechanical response of microstructured materials can be modelled with sufficient accuracy and efficiently through gradient elasticity. Compared to classical elasticity, the governing equations of gradient elasticity are equipped with additional spatial gradients of relevant variables (such as strains and/or accelerations). Through the inclusion of these additional gradients, phenomena that are dominated by microstructural influences can be modelled accurately and realistically, such as stress and strain concentrations around crack tips [2, 3, 4, 5] or dislocation cores [6, 7, 8], and the size-dependent mechanical behaviour of specimens [4, 9, 10]. For a more recent account on the use of gradient theory to eliminate elastic singularities in dislocation lines and crack tips, as well as to interpret size effects, one may consult [11]. In dynamics, there is the additional motivation of simulating dispersive wave propagation, but this is beyond the scope of this short note.

Keywords

Couple Stress Gradient Elasticity Classical Elasticity Standard Finite Element Finite Element Implementation 

References

  1. 1.
    Wang J, Lam DCC (2009) J Mater Sci 44:985. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-008-3219-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Altan SB, Aifantis EC (1992) Scr Metall Mater 26:319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ru CQ, Aifantis EC (1993) Acta Mech 101:59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Askes H, Morata I, Aifantis EC (2008) Comput Struct 86:1266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Askes H, Gitman IM (2009) Int J Fract 156:217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gutkin MY, Aifantis EC (1999) Scr Mater 40:559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Aifantis EC (2003) Mech Mater 35:259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lazar M, Maugin GA, Aifantis EC (2005) Phys Status Solidi B 242:2365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Aifantis EC (1999) Int J Fract 95:299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Askes H, Aifantis EC (2002) Int J Fract 117:347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Aifantis EC (2009) Int J Eng Sci 47:1089CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tenek LT, Aifantis EC (2002) Comput Model Eng Sci 3:731Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lam DCC, Yang F, Chong ACM, Wang J, Tong P (2003) J Mech Phys Solids Solids 51:1477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wang J, Lam DCC (2010) Comput Mater Contin 17:215Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zervos A (2008) Int J Numer Method Eng 73:564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Askes H, Aifantis EC (2011) Int J Solids Struct 48:1962CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil and Structural EngineeringUniversity of SheffieldSheffieldUK
  2. 2.Polytechnic School, Laboratory of Mechanics and MaterialsAristotle University of ThessalonikiThessalonikiGreece

Personalised recommendations