Advertisement

Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 46, Issue 15, pp 5165–5170 | Cite as

Dynamic tests of cemented paste backfill: effects of strain rate, curing time, and cement content on compressive strength

  • Sheng Huang
  • Kaiwen XiaEmail author
  • Lan Qiao
Article

Abstract

This article investigates the compressive strength of cemented paste backfill (CPB) under dynamic loading. To accommodate the low impedance CPB, a modified split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) system is adopted. In contrast to traditional solid steel transmitted bar, a hollow aluminum transmitted bar is introduced to reduce the impedance. With this system, the dynamic stress equilibrium is achieved, which guarantees the valid dynamic material testing condition. The dynamic tests are conducted for CPB with different cement contents and curing time. It is observed that: (1) for CPB with the same curing time and cement content, the dynamic strength increases with the strain rate, (2) for CPB with the same cement content, the dynamic strength increases with the curing time, and (3) for CPB with the same curing time and tested under similar strain rate, the dynamic strength increases with the percentage of cement. This observation can be understood by considering the hydration process of cements.

Keywords

Compressive Strength Portland Cement Uniaxial Compressive Strength Rock Burst Mine Tailing 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by NSERC/Discovery grant # 72031326 and NSERC/CRD grant # 364719 in association with Barrick Gold Corporation, Xstrata Copper Canada Ltd., and Inmet Mining Corporation. K.X. also acknowledges the financial support by the opening project (#Z110802) of State Key Laboratory of Science and Technology (Beijing Institute of Technology).

References

  1. 1.
    Belem T, Benzaazoua M (2004) In: Villaescusa and Potvin (eds) The 5th International Symposium on Ground Support in Mining and Underground Construction. Taylor & Francis Group, Perth, Australia, p 637Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Landriault D, Lidkea W (1993) In: Bawden and Archibald (eds) Innovative mine design for the 21st century: Proceedings of the International Congress on Mine Design, Kingston, Canada, p 111 Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kesimal A, Yilmaz E, Ercikdi B (2004) Cem Concr Res 34:1817CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kesimal A, Yilmaz E, Ercikdi B, Alp I, Deveci H (2005) Mater Lett 59:3703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Klein K, Simon D (2006) Can Geotech J 43:310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fall M, Belem T, Samb S, Benzaazoua M (2007) J Mater Sci 42:3914. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-0403-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chong KP, Hoyt PM, Smith JW, Paulsen BY (1980) Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 17:35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cai M, Kaiser PK, Suorineni F, Su K (2007) Phys Chem Earth 32:907CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kaiser PK, McCreath DR, Tannant DD (1996) Rockburst research handbook. CAMIRO Mining Division, Sudbury Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kolsky H (1949) Proc R Soc A B62:676Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nemat-Nasser S (2000) In: Kuhn H and Medlin D (eds) ASM metals handbook, vol 8: mechanical testing and evaluation. ASM International, Materials Park, p 3Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chen W, Zhang B, Forrestal MJ (1999) Exp Mech 39:81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Luo H, Lu H, Leventis N (2006) Mech Time-Depend Mater 10:83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mulliken AD, Boyce MC (2006) Int J Solid Struct 43:1331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Li QM, Meng H (2003) Int J Solid Struct 40:343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Forrestal MJ, Wright TW, Chen W (2007) Int J Impact Eng 34:405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chen W, Lu F, Frew DJ, Forrestal MJ (2002) J Appl Mech 69:214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Frew DJ, Forrestal MJ, Chen W (2002) Exp Mech 42:93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fu HC, Erki MA, Seckin M (1991) J Struct Eng 117:3645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bischoff PH, Perry SH (1991) Mater Struct 24:425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ercikdi B, Kesimal A, Cihangir F, Deveci H, Alp I (2009) Cem Concr Res 31:268CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  2. 2.University of Science and Technology BeijingBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations