Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 44, Issue 12, pp 3265–3272 | Cite as

Comparison of the coatings deposited using Ti and B4C powder by reactive plasma spraying in air and low pressure

  • Zhengping Mao
  • Jing Ma
  • Jun Wang
  • Baode SunEmail author


The coatings were deposited by reactive plasma spraying (RPS) in air and low-pressure plasma spraying (LPPS) based on the reaction between Ti and B4C powder, respectively. The thermal spray powder of Ti and B4C added with powder Cr (metallic binder) in air is compared with that without powder Cr addition in the low pressure. (Prior to deposition, the powder was screened and separated for RPS whereas spray drying, sintering and sieving were done for LPPS.) The phase composition and the microstructure of coatings were studied by X-ray diffractometer (XRD) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The anti-corrosion property of coatings was also investigated. It is found that the coating prepared by RPS, which is more densification, is composed of TiN, TiB2, and a small phase fraction of titanium oxides. The composition of the coating deposited by reactive LPPS is TiB2, Ti(C, N), Ti4N3−x and impurity phase of Ti5Si3. There is no appearance of titanium oxides in low pressure. The coatings have the typical lamellar structure and adhere to the bond coating well. The mean Vickers microhardness value of the coating deposited by RPS is higher than that of the coating deposited by LPPS. Furthermore, the corrosion resistance of the coating deposited by RPS is superior to that of the coating prepared by LPPS in near neutral 3.5 wt% NaCl electrolyte.


Vickers Microhardness Weibull Modulus Blended Powder Plasma Flame Scanning Electron Microscopy Morphology 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



This study was financially supported by the Opening fund Program of China (No. KFJJ07-2). The authors are grateful to Mr. H. Ji and Mr. X. M Zhu for depositing of coatings, and the XRD analysis by Mr. H. B. Han for in the instrumental analysis centre of Shanghai Jiaotong University. The authors are also thankful for the hard work of editors and reviewers on this article.


  1. 1.
    Tu JP, Rong W, Guo SY, Yang YZ (2003) Wear 255:832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cairo CAA, Florian M, Graca MLA, Bressiani JC (2003) Mater Sci Eng A 358:298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bull SJ, Bhat DG, Staia MH (2003) Surf Coat Technol 163–164:499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Singh A, Dahotre NB (2004) J Mater Sci 39:4553. doi: CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Anal A, Bandyopadhyay TK, Das K (2006) J Mater Process Technol 172:70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Liu HY, Huang JH, Yin CF et al (2007) Ceram Int 33:827CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Xiao L, Yan D, He J et al (2007) Appl Surf Sci 253:7535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chavanes A, Pauty E, Woydt M (2004) Wear 256:547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kang YS, Kang SH, Kim DJ (2005) J Mater Sci 40:4153. doi: CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wang XB, Shun HL, Li CG et al (2006) Surf Coat Technol 201:2500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Xu J, Liu WJ (2006) Wear 260:486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Stoiber M, Panzenbőck M, Mitterer C, Lugmair C (2001) Surf Coat Technol 142–144:117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Liu Z-J, Leicht P, Liu Y-X, Liu Z-K (2006) Surf Coat Technol 201:2818CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Puchi-Cabrera ES, Staia MH, Quinto DT et al (2007) Int J Fatigue 29:471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Polcar T, Kubart T, Nova′k R et al (2005) Surf Coat Technol 193:192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zukerman I, Raveh A, Kalman H et al (2007) Wear 263:1249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Shenhar A, Gotman I, Radin S et al (2000) Surf Coat Technol 126:210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kobayashi A (2000) Surf Coat Technol 132:152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tekmen C, Tsunekawa Y, Okumiya M (2008) Surf Coat Technol 202:4170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wen G, Li SB, Zhang BS, Guo ZX (2001) Acta Mater 49:1463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zhou H, Li F, He B et al (2007) Surf Coat Technol 201:7360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lima RS, Kucuk A, Berndt CC (2002) Mater Sci Eng A 327:224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Levi G, Kaplan WD, Bamberger M (1998) Mater Lett 35:344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mao Z, Ma J, Wang J, Sun B (2009) Appl Surf Sci 255:3784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Stoloff NS (1999) Mater Sci Eng A 261:169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Yeh CL, Wang HJ, Chen WH (2008) J Alloy Compd 450:200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Feng W, Yan D, He J et al (2005) Appl Surf Sci 243:204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hashimoto K, Osada K, Masumoto T, Shimodaira S (1976) Corros Sci 16:71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Habazaki H, Ukai H, Izumiya K, Hashimoto K (2001) Mater Sci Eng A 318:77CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Metal Matrix CompositesShanghai Jiaotong UniversityShanghaiPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.State Key Laboratory of Explosion Science and TechnologyBeijing Institute of TechnologyBeijingPeople’s Republic of China
  3. 3.Material InstituteHebei University of Science and TechnologyShijiazhuangPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations