Advertisement

Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 44, Issue 12, pp 3098–3111 | Cite as

On the acid–base stability of Keggin Al13 and Al30 polymers in polyaluminum coagulants

  • Zhaoyang ChenEmail author
  • Zhaokun Luan
  • Zhiping Jia
  • Xiaosen LiEmail author
Article

Abstract

The acid–base stabilities of Al13 and Al30 in polyaluminum coagulants during aging and after dosing into water were studied systematically using batch and flow-through acid–base titration experiments. The acid decomposition rates of both Al13 and Al30 increase rapidly with the decrease in solution pH. The acid decompositions of Al13 and Al30 with respect to H+ concentration are composed of two parallel first-order and second-order reactions, and the reaction orders are 1.169 and 1.005, respectively. The acid decomposition rates of Al13 and Al30 increase slightly when the temperature increases from 20 to ca. 35 °C, but decrease when the temperature increases further. Al30 is more stable than Al13 in acidic solution, and the stability difference increases as the pH decreases. Al30 is more possible to become the dominant species in polyaluminum coagulants than Al13. The acid catalyzed decomposition and followed by recrystallization to form bayerite is one of the main processes that are responsible for the decrease of Al13 and Al30 in polyaluminum coagulants during storage. The deprotonation and polymerization of Al13 and Al30 depend on solution pH. The hydrolysis products are positively charged, and consist mainly of repeated Al13 and Al30 units rather than amorphous Al(OH)3 precipitates. Al30 is less stable than Al13 upon alkaline hydrolysis. Al13 is stable at pH < 5.9, while Al30 lose one proton at the pH 4.6–5.75. Al13 and Al30 lose respective 5 and 10 protons and form [Al13]n and [Al30]n clusters within the pH region of 5.9–6.25 and 5.75–6.65, respectively. This indicates that Al30 is easier to aggregate than Al13 at the acidic side, but [Al13]n is much easier to convert to Alsol–gel than [Al30]n. Al30 possesses better characteristics than Al13 when used as coagulant because the hydrolysis products of Al30 possess higher charges than that of Al13, and [Al30]n clusters exist within a wider pH range.

Keywords

Gibbsite Apparent Rate Constant Base Titration Bayerite Acid Decomposition 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The work was financially supported by the National High Technology Research and Development Key Program of China (863 Program) (No. 2002AA601290) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 50874098 and No. 40673003).

References

  1. 1.
    Bertsch PM, Parker DR (1996) In: Sposito G (ed) The environmental chemistry of aluminum. CRC Press, New York, p 117Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jolivet JP, Henry M, Livage J (2000) Metal oxide chemistry and synthesis from solution to solid state. Wiley, Chichester, p 53Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Casey WH, Phillips BL, Furrer G (2001) In: Banfield JF, Navrotsky A (eds) Nanoparticles and the environment, Reviews in Mineralogy & Geochemistry, vol 44. Mineralogical Society of America and Geochemical Society, Washington, DC, p 167Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Duan JM, Gregory J (2003) Adv Colloid Interface Sci 100–102:475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pernitsky DJ (2001) Drinking water coagulation with polyaluminum coagulants—mechanism and selection guidelines. PhD thesis, University of MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Aceman S, Lahav N, Yariv S (2000) Appl Clay Sci 17:99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Occelli ML, Bertrand JA, Gould SAC, Dominguez JM (2000) Micropor Mesopor Mater 34:195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ahmad MHARM, Mahmood CS, Mohamed AA, Ibrahim A, Alias R, Shapee SM, Yahya MR, Mat AFA (2008) Mater Lett 62:2339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wang M, Muhammed M (1999) Nanostruct Mater 11:1219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fitzgerald JJ (1988) In: Laden K, Felger C (eds) Antiperspirants and deodorants. Dekker, New York, p P119Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Casey WH, Rustad JR, Banerjee D, Furrer G (2005) J Nanopart Res 7:377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Phillips BL, Casey WH, Karlsson M (2000) Nature 404:379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Furrer G, Phillips BL, Ulrich KU, Pöthig R, Casey WH (2002) Science 297:2245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hunter D, Ross DS (1991) Science 251:1056CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Parker DR, Bertsch PM (1992) Environ Sci Technol 26:914CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tang HX (1998) Acta Sci Circumst 18:1 in ChineseGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bi SP, Wang CY, Cao Q, Zhang CH (2004) Coord Chem Rev 248:441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Allouche L, Gérardin C, Loiseau T, Férey G, Taulelle F (2000) Angew Chem Int Ed 39:511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rowsell J, Nazar LF (2000) J Am Chem Soc 122:3777CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Seichter W, Mögel HJ, Brand P, Salah D (1998) Eur J Inorg Chem 6:795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Casey WH, Olmstead MM, Phillips BL (2005) Inorg Chem 44:4888CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Phillips BL, Lee A, Casey WH (2003) Geochim Cosmochim Acta 67:2725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Allouche L, Huguenard C, Taulelle F (2001) J Phys Chem Solids 62:1525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Allouche L, Taulelle F (2003) Inorg Chem Commun 6:1167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Shafran KL, Deschaume O, Perry CC (2005) J Mater Chem 15:3415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Shafran KL, Perry CC (2005) Dalton Trans 2098Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Chen ZY, Fan B, Peng XJ, Zhang ZG, Fan JH, Luan ZK (2006) Chemosphere 64:912CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Chen ZY, Luan ZK, Fan JH, Zhang ZG, Peng XJ, Fan B (2007) Coll Surf A Physicochem Eng Aspects 292:110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Rustad JR (2005) Geochim Cosmochim Acta 69:4397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Gao BY, Yue QY, Wang BJ (2002) Chemosphere 46:809CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wang WZ, Hsu PH (1994) Clay Clay Miner 42:356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Chen ZY, Liu CJ, Luan ZK, Zhang ZG, Li YZ, Jia ZP (2005) Chin Sci Bull 50:2010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Furrer G, Gfeller M, Wehrli B (1999) Geochim Cosmochim Acta 63:3069CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Furrer G, Ludwig C, Schindler PW (1992) J Coll Interf Sci 149:56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Lee AP, Furrer G, Casey WH (2002) J Coll Interf Sci 250:269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Parker DR, Bertsch PM (1992) Environ Sci Technol 26:908CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Chen ZY, Luan ZK, Fan B, Zhang ZG, Li YZ, Jia ZP (2006) Chin J Anal Chem 34:38 in ChineseGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Casey WH, Phillips BL, Karlsson M, Nordin S, Nordin JP, Sullivan DJ, Susan NC (2000) Geochim Cosmochim Acta 64:2951CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Bradley SM, Kydd RA, Howe RF (1993) J Coll Interf Sci 159:405CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Renewable Energy and Gas Hydrate, CAS, Guangzhou Institute of Energy ConversionChinese Academy of SciencesGuangzhouChina
  2. 2.State Key Laboratory of Environmental Aquatic Chemistry, Research Center for Eco-Environmental SciencesChinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations