Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 44, Issue 4, pp 1006–1015 | Cite as

Application of the work of indentation approach for the characterization of aluminium 2024-T351 and Al cladding by nanoindentation

  • M. K. Khan
  • S. V. Hainsworth
  • M. E. FitzpatrickEmail author
  • L. Edwards


Nanoindentation has been used to characterize the mechanical properties of aerospace-grade Al2024-T351 with and without a clad layer of pure aluminium. The clad layer is introduced by means of a roll-bonding process which can cause significant work-hardening of the material in the clad layer. The hardness and Young’s modulus of the pure aluminium and the Al2024 have been determined by a number of methods, including the traditional Oliver and Pharr method, and a number of other methods, including direct measurement of the indentation by atomic force microscopy, and evaluation of the work of indentation. The Oliver and Pharr method was found to underestimate the area of contact as it did not include the area of piled-up material around the indentation periphery. This gave a corresponding overestimation of both hardness and modulus. The area of the indentation measured by atomic force microscopy was similarly found to underestimate the contact area owing to relaxation of material around the indent between indentation and imaging. The work of indentation approach was found to give good agreement between the hardness calculated by nanoindentation and those found in the literature.


Atomic Force Microscopy Indentation Depth Total Work Plastic Work Elastic Recovery 



Mr I. Norman of Materials Engineering at The Open University is thanked for his help with the experimental work. M. K. Khan is funded by Airbus Deutschland, and Dr D. Furfari is duly acknowledged for his support.


  1. 1.
    Oliver WC, Pharr GM (1992) J Mater Res 7:1564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kese KO, Li ZC, Bergman B (2004) J Mater Res 19:3109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Beegan D, Chowdhury S, Laugier MT (2005) Surf Coat Technol 192:57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bolshakov A, Pharr GM (1998) J Mater Res 13:1049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kese KO, Li ZC, Bergman B (2005) Mater Sci Eng A404:1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Taljat B, Pharr GM (2004) Int J Solids Struct 41:3891CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Beegan D, Chowdhury S, Laugier MT (2003) Surf Coat Technol 176:124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kese KO, Li ZC (2006) Scripta Mater 55:699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Saha R, Nix WD (2001) Mater Sci Eng A319–321:898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tang C, Li Y, Zeng K (2004) Mater Sci Eng A384:215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Beegan D, Chowdhury S, Laugier MT (2004) Thin Solid Films 466:167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pharr GM (1998) Mater Sci Eng A253:151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tuck JR, Korsunky AM, Bull SJ, Davidson RI (2001) Surf Coat Technol 137:217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pothapragada RM, Mirshams RA, Vadlakonda S (2005) Mater Res Soc Symp Proc 880E:BB7.9.1Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zhou L, Yao Y (2007) Mater Sci Eng A460–461:95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tuck JR, Korsunsky AM, Davidson RI, Bull SJ, Elliott DM (2000) Surf Coat Technol 127:1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Stillwell NA, Tabor D (1961) Proc Phys Soc Lond 78:169CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. K. Khan
    • 1
  • S. V. Hainsworth
    • 2
  • M. E. Fitzpatrick
    • 1
    Email author
  • L. Edwards
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Materials EngineeringThe Open UniversityMilton KeynesUK
  2. 2.Department of EngineeringUniversity of LeicesterLeicesterUK
  3. 3.Institute of Materials EngineeringANSTO, PMB1MenaiAustralia

Personalised recommendations