Advertisement

Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 43, Issue 21, pp 6992–6997 | Cite as

Observation of two α-relaxation peaks in a nanoclay-filled epoxy compound

  • Bahereh T. Marouf
  • Reza Bagheri
  • Raymond A. PearsonEmail author
Letter

Introduction

For over 10 years, the effect of nanosilicate layers on glass transition temperature of epoxy resins has been studied by various research groups. Unfortunately, there appears to be no consensus in the literature regarding the role of nanoclay addition on α-relaxation peak ( T g-peak) in montmorillonite (MMT)-filled epoxy compounds [ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8]. Several studies reported an increase in the overall glass transition temperature ( T g) of MMT-filled epoxies compared to the neat epoxy [ 1, 2, 3], while other studies claimed suppression of the T g in these nanocomposites [ 4, 5, 6]. There are even some results indicating that the addition of nanoclay has no effect on α-relaxation peak of epoxy resins [ 7, 8]. Table  1 contains a description of the materials investigated in these studies. The following sections contain discussions of glass transition behavior in several types of nanoclay-filled epoxies.
Table 1

Summary of materials investigated in the referred studies

Reference

Keywords

Epoxy Dynamic Mechanical Analyzer Silicate Layer Hard Segment Relaxation Peak 

Notes

Acknowledgement

The financial support from ARKEMA, Iranian Gas and Petrochemical Institute and Sharif University of Technology is gratefully acknowledged.

References

  1. 1.
    Messersmith PB, Giannelis EP (1994) Chem Mater 6:1719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lu H, Nutt S (2003) Macromolecules 36:4010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tolle TB, Anderson DP (2004) J Appl Polym Sci 91:89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chen JS, Poliks MD, Ober CK, Zhang Y, Wiesner U, Giannelis E (2002) Polymer 43:4895CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Becker O, Varley R, Simon G (2002) Polymer 43:4365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Liu W, Hoa SV, Pugh M (2005) Compos Sci Technol 65:307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hutchinson JM, Montserrat S, Roman F, Cortes P, Campos L (2006) J Appl Polym Sci 102:3751CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Triantafillidis CS, Lebaron PC, Pinnavaia TJ (2002) Chem Mater 14:4088CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jackson CL, McKenna GB (1991) J Non-Cryst Solids 131–133:221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yasmin A, Abot JL, Daniel IM (2003) Scr Mater 49:81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shi H, Lan T, Pinnavaia TJ (1996) Chem Mater 8:1584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gupta N, Lin TC, Shapiro M (2007) JOM Mar:61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Velmurugan R, Mohan TP (2004) J Mater Sci 39:7333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bansal A et al (2005) Nat Mater 4:693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mayes AN (2005) Nat Mater 4:651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wang J, Qin S (2007) Mater Lett 61:4222CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bahereh T. Marouf
    • 1
    • 2
  • Reza Bagheri
    • 1
  • Raymond A. Pearson
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Materials Science and Engineering Department, Polymeric Materials Research GroupSharif University of TechnologyTehranIran
  2. 2.Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Center for Polymer Science and EngineeringLehigh UniversityBethlehemUSA

Personalised recommendations