Advertisement

Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 43, Issue 23–24, pp 7385–7390 | Cite as

Dynamic deformation behavior of ultrafine grained aluminum produced by ARB and subsequent annealing

  • Naoki TakataEmail author
  • Yoshitaka Okitsu
  • Nobuhiro Tsuji
Ultrafine-Grained Materials

Abstract

Commercial purity aluminum (1100-Al) sheets with various grain sizes, ranging from 0.2 to 10 μm, were fabricated through accumulative roll bonding (ARB) and subsequent annealing at various temperatures. Mechanical properties of these materials were examined at various strain rates ranging from 10−2 to 103 s−1 (from quasi-static deformation to dynamic deformation). Yield strength of the UFG specimens did not change so much when the strain rate changed. Yielding behavior of the UFG Al with grain size of 1.4 µm was characterized by yield-drop phenomenon, which appeared at higher strain rate. It was found that strain-hardening of the Al matrix was significantly enhanced at high strain rates, which was independent of the grain size. Uniform elongation increased with increasing strain rate in the specimens with the grain size larger than 1 µm, while post-uniform elongation increased with increasing strain rate in the submicrometer grain-sized specimens. Consequently, total elongation of all specimens was improved as the strain rate increased.

Keywords

High Strain Rate Accumulative Roll Bonding Total Elongation Uniform Elongation Increase Strain Rate 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank for the financial supports by the Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientist (Start Up) (No. 18860051), Grant-in-Aid for scientific research from the ministry of education on priority areas “Giant straining process for advanced materials containing ultra-high density lattice defects”, and Industrial Technology research Grain Program ‘05 through New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization (NEDO) of Japan (project ID: 05A27502d).

References

  1. 1.
    Altan BS, Miskioglu I, Purcek G, Mulyukov RR, Artan R (2006) Severe plastic deformation towards bulk production of nanostructured materials. NOVA Science Publishers, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tsuji N, Saito Y, Lee SH, Minamino Y (2003) Adv Eng Mater 5:338. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.200310077 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Saito Y, Tsuji N, Utsunomiya Y, Sakai T, Hong HG (1998) Scr Mater 391:221Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Saito Y, Utsunomiya H, Tsuji N, Sakai T (1999) Acta Mater 47:579. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6454(98)00365-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tsuji N, Ito Y, Saito Y, Minamino Y (2002) Scr Mater 47:893. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6462(02)00282-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lu L, Sui ML, Lu K (2000) Science 287:1463. doi: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.287.5457.1463 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Huang X, Hansen N, Tsuji N (2006) Science 312:249. doi: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1124268 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mayer MA, Mishra A, Benson DJ (2006) Prog Mater Sci 51:427. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2005.08.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tsuji N (2007) J Nanosci Nanotechnol 7:3765. doi: https://doi.org/10.1166/jnn.2007.025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wang YM, Ma E (2004) Mater Sci Eng A 375–377:46. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2003.10.214 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wei Q, Cheng S, Ramesh KT, Ma E (2004) Mater Sci Eng A 381:71. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2004.03.064 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chen J, Lu L, Lu K (2006) Scr Mater 54:1913. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2006.02.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Vehoff H, Lemaire D, Schuler K, Waschkies T, Yang B (2007) Int J Mater Res 98:259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tanimura S, Mimura K, Umeda T (2003) J Phys IV Fr 110:385. doi: https://doi.org/10.1051/jp4:20020724 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kamikawa N (2006) PhD thesis. Osaka UniversityGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hall EO (1970) Yield point phenomena in metals and alloys. MacmillanGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Suzuki T (1968) In: Rosenfield AR, Hahn GT, Bement AL Jr, Jaffee RI (eds) Dislocation dynamics. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hansen N, Jensen DJ (1999) Philos Trans R Soc Lond A 357:1447. doi: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.1999.0384 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Humphreys FJ, Hatherly M (2002) Recrystallizaiton and related annealing phenomena, 2nd edn. Elsevier Science, UKGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Naoki Takata
    • 1
    Email author
  • Yoshitaka Okitsu
    • 2
  • Nobuhiro Tsuji
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Metallurgy and Ceramics ScienceTokyo Institute of TechnologyMegro-kuJapan
  2. 2.Automobile R&D CenterHonda R&D, Co., Ltd.Haga-machiJapan
  3. 3.Department of Adaptive Machine SystemsOsaka UniversitySuitaJapan

Personalised recommendations