Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 43, Issue 18, pp 6200–6205 | Cite as

Effect of a novel sequential motion compaction process on the densification of multi-layer spray deposited 7090/SiCp composite

  • Y. P. Sun
  • H. G. YanEmail author
  • Z. H. Chen
  • D. Chen
  • G. Chen


In the present study, a large dimension Al–10.15Zn–3.6Mg–1.8Cu–0.15Ni–0.3Zr/SiCp composite was synthesized by the multi-layer spray deposition process, then densities by a novel sequential motion compaction technique. The microstructures and mechanical properties of the multi-layer spray-deposited Al–10.15Zn–3.6Mg–1.8Cu–0.15Ni–0.3Zr/SiCp composite were studied by optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy, and tensile tests before and after densities. The experimental results showed that sequential motion compaction technique can be used to fully density sample with large dimensions and difficult to further processing by the traditional techniques. This technique can greatly improve the microstructures and mechanical properties of the composite. The pores in the composite are elongated and closed through model pressing at the jointed effect of huge hydrostatic pressure and shearing stress. After pressed, SiC particles in the composite were broken and redistributed. Compared with the as-spray-deposited composite, the tensile properties of compaction processed composite have a great improvement not only in transverse direction but also in longitudinal direction. When the thickness reduction is about 40%, relative densities approach the theoretical density, and the actual relative density is 91.76%. The relative theoretical density is 93%.


Thickness Reduction Compaction Process Porous Composite Reinforce Aluminum Matrix Composite Particulate Reinforce Aluminum Matrix 



The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of New Century Excellent Talents in University of China (NCET-06-0701). The authors also thank Dr. Y.Q. He and Dr. H. Zhang.


  1. 1.
    Zhao N, Philip N, Xianjin Y (2005) J Mater Process Technol 170:586. doi: CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pandey AB, Majumdar BS, Miracle DB (1999) Mater Sci Eng A 259:296. doi: CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Trifonova VG, Kamalova IV, Romanova VS, Platonov VN (1997) Mater Sci Eng A 234–236:242. doi: CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Singer ARE (1970) Metab Matter 4:246Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chen Z-H, Huang P-Y, Jiang X-Y et al (1985) Chin J Nonferrous Met 5(4):70Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Prakash U, Raghu T, Gokhale AA, Kamat SV (1999) J Mater Sci 34:5061. doi: CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lavernia EJ, Grant NJ (1988) Mater Sci Eng 98:381. doi: CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Skinner DJ, Bye RL, Raybould D, Brown AM (1986) Scipta Metall 20:867. doi: CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hariprasad S, Sastry SML, Jerina KL et al (1993) Metall Trans A 24(4):865CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bhargava S, Dube RK (1986) Mater Sci Technol 2:400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Henry R (1997) Progr Mater Sci 42:263. doi: CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sanchez F, Bolarin A, Coreno J (2001) Powder Metall 44(4):351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kuhn HA (1976) AMP 16:171Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Redmilovic V, Thamas G (1991) Mater Sci Eng 32(8):171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gnjidic Z, Bozic D, Mitkov M (2001) Mater Charact 47(2):129. doi: CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Y. P. Sun
    • 1
  • H. G. Yan
    • 1
    Email author
  • Z. H. Chen
    • 1
  • D. Chen
    • 1
  • G. Chen
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Materials Science and EngineeringHunan UniversityChangshaPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations