Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 43, Issue 17, pp 6012–6015 | Cite as

Anomalous electrical conductivity and percolation in carbon nanotube composites

  • Chunsheng LuEmail author
  • Yiu-Wing Mai

Transport properties of disordered multiphase materials, such as electrical and thermal conductivities, have been an active research area in statistical physics for decades. In a composite consisting of conductive fillers dispersed in an insulating matrix, there is a well-defined insulator–conductor transition when an infinite conductive network or path throughout the matrix is formed. This process can be well described by percolation theory [1, 2]. Recently, carbon nanotube (CNT)-reinforced composites and suspensions have attracted a great deal of attention due to their excellent properties and many potential applications. CNTs have a unique set of mechanical and physical properties, including extremely high Young’s modulus, strength, electrical, and thermal conductivities. The current experiments showed that CNT-reinforced composites exhibit an electrical percolation with addition of 0.1 vol.% or less fillers, at which electrical conductivity rises sharply by several orders of...


Percolation Threshold Percolation Theory Percolation Cluster Electrical Percolation Electrical Percolation Threshold 



This work was supported by the Curtin Internal Research Grants and the Australian Research Council.


  1. 1.
    Zallen R (1983) The physics of amorphous solids. Wiley, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Stauffer D, Aharony A (1994) Introduction to percolation theory. Taylor & Francis, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sandler JKW, Kirk JE, Kinloch IA, Shaffer MSP, Windle AH (2003) Polymer 44:5893CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bryning MB, Islam MF, Kikkawa JM, Yodh AG (2005) Adv Mater 17:1186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Vigolo B, Coulon C, Maugey M, Zakri C, Poulin P (2005) Science 309:920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Stankovich S, Dikin DA, Dommett GHB, Kohlhaas KM, Zimney EJ, Stach EA, Piner RD, Nguyen ST, Ruoff RS (2006) Nature 442:282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kovacs JZ, Velagala BS, Schulte K, Bauhofer W (2007) Compos Sci Technol 67:922CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Choi SUS, Zhang ZG, Yu W, Lockwood FE, Grulke EA (2001) Appl Phys Lett 79:2252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lu C, Mai Y-W (2005) Phys Rev Lett 95:088303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lu C, Mai Y-W (2007) Compos Sci Technol 67:2895CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Takayasu H (1990) Fractals in the physical sciences. Manchester University Press, ManchesterGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Garboczi EJ, Snyder KA, Douglas JF, Thorpe MF (1995) Phys Rev E 52:819CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Foygel M, Morris RD, Anez D, French S, Sobolev VL (2005) Phys Rev B 71:104201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Du F, Fischer JE, Winey KI (2005) Phys Rev B 72:121404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Biercuk MJ, Liaguno MC, Radosavljevic M, Hyun JK, Johnson AT, Fischer JE (2002) Appl Phys Lett 80:2767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Shenogina N, Shenogin S, Xue L, Keblinski P (2005) Appl Phys Lett 87:133106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gojny FH, Wichmann MHG, Fiedler B, Kinloch IA, Bauhofer W, Windle AH, Schulte K (2006) Polymer 47:2036CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringCurtin University of TechnologyPerthAustralia
  2. 2.Centre for Advanced Materials Technology (CAMT), School of Aerospace, Mechanical and Mechatronic Engineering J07The University of SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations