Advertisement

Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 43, Issue 17, pp 5972–5976 | Cite as

Compositional effect on optical characteristics of solution grown (Cd1−xSnx)S thin films

  • R. DasEmail author
  • Rajesh Kumar
Article

Abstract

A good deal of information regarding the synthesis and optical properties of chemically grown (Cd1−xSnx)S (x = 0.01–0.40) thin film has been reported. The growth of these films depends on various preparative parameters and deposition conditions. The reactant concentration, pH, deposition temperature, and rate of agitation were found to influence significantly the quality and thickness of the films. The photoconductive studies have been done with the help of rise and decay curves. Lifetime, mobility, and trap depth are calculated for observed parameters. Band gap measurements for the prepared films have been done with the help of optical transmission spectra using UV-VIS-IR spectrophotometer (190–1100 Å). Interesting results of PC rise and decay studies, optical absorption, and transmission spectra have been presented and discussed. Mobility is influenced significantly by Sn composition. The action spectra showed displacement in the absorption edge towards lower energy side by the addition of Sn mole content. The energy gap decreased from 2.1 to 1.9 eV for x = 0.01 and 1.85 eV for x = 0.02.

Keywords

Decay Curve Chemical Bath Deposition Trap Depth Decay Study Chemical Bath Deposition Method 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Authors are thankful to the Bhilai Institute of Technology, Durg management for providing all financial support.

References

  1. 1.
    Roy P, Srivastava SK (2006) J Phys D Appl Phys 39:4771. doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/39/22/006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    George PJ, Juarez AS, Nair PK (1996) Semicond Sci Technol 111:1090. doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/0268-1242/11/7/021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sim LY, Kazmereski LL, Clak AH, Ireland PJ, Mortom DW (1978) J Vac Sci Technol 15:265. doi: https://doi.org/10.1116/1.569567 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chandra T, Bhushan S (2004) J Mater Sci (Springer) 39:6303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Deshmukh LP, More BM, Holikatti SG, Hankare P (1994) Bull Mater Sci 17:455. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02757889 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jodgudri SA, Mohite UK, Godave KM, Lokhande CD (1994) Ind J Pure Appl Phys 32:772Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sharma TP, Patidar D, Saxena NS, Sharma K (2006) Ind J Pure Appl Phys 44:125Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bhosale CH, Uplane MD, Patil PS, Lokhande CD (1994) Ind J Pure Appl Phys 32:269Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ubale AU, Sangwar VS, Kulkarni DK (2007) Bull Mater Sci 30:147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bhushan S, Mukherjee M, Bose P (2001) Radiat Eff Defects 153:367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chopra KL (1969) Thin film phenomena. McGraw-Hill, New York, p 14Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Narayanan KL, Vijay Kumar KP, Nair KGM, Rao GVN (1997) Bull Mater Sci 20:287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Soliman LI, Afify HH, Battisha IK (2004) Ind J Pure Appl Phys 42:12Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sze SM (1981) Physics of semiconductor devices, vol 16. Wiley, New York, p 849Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Applied PhysicsBhilai Institute of TechnologyDurgIndia

Personalised recommendations