Advertisement

Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 43, Issue 14, pp 4840–4848 | Cite as

Microscopic fracture mechanisms observed on Cu–Sn frangible bullets under quasi-static and dynamic compression

  • S. W. Banovic
  • S. P. Mates
Article

Abstract

The damage behavior of Cu–Sn frangible bullets was characterized in an effort to aid predictions of impact performance of these projectiles with soft body armor through finite element simulations. Fracture surfaces and failed cross sections were examined via light optical and scanning electron microscopy and related to the composite bullet microstructure. Two types of samples were analyzed: (1) those used in quasi-static and dynamic diametral compression testing to determine the effective properties of the composite material, and (2) bullets discharged into soft body armor. Two primary microscopic fracture mechanisms were cleavage and intergranular fracture of the Cu–Sn intermetallic compounds, ɛ(Cu3Sn) and η(Cu6Sn5), which joined the un-bonded copper particles in the composite microstructure. Microvoid coalescence of copper metal was also observed, though infrequently, in places where the spacing between intermetallic phase clusters on a single copper particle was typically no greater than 30 μm. These modes of failure were similar between the samples used in the mechanical testing methods and the discharged bullets. From these results, it is reasonable to assume that the failure strength data measured via diametral compression testing can be used to predict the onset of bullet failure on impact during finite element simulations.

Keywords

Finite Element Simulation Intergranular Fracture Copper Particle Microvoid Coalescence Body Armor 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Office of Law Enforcement Standards at NIST and the National Institute of Justice at the Department of Justice. The discharged bullets were tested and obtained with the help of M. Riley and N. Waters. Disclaimer: Identification of any product in this manuscript does not imply recommendation or endorsement by NIST, the Department of Commerce, or the U.S. Government, nor does it imply that the identified product is the best available.

References

  1. 1.
    United States Patent 6,090,178. July 18, 2000. Frangible metal bullets, ammunition, and method of making such articles (Inventory is Joseph C. Benini)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Banovic SW (2007) Mater Sci Eng A 460–461:428. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2007.01.113 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mates SP, Rhorer R, Banovic S, Whitenton E, Fields RJ (2008) Int J Impact Eng 35(6):511. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2007.04.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rudnick A, Hunter AR, Holden FC (1963) Mater Res Stand 3:283Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gray GT III (1990) ASM handbook, vol 8. The American Society for Metals, Materials Park, OH, pp 462–476Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    National Institute of Justice (1987) Ballistic resistance of police body armor. NIJ Standard-0101.03Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Meyers MA (1994) Dynamic behavior of materials. John Wiley & Sons, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Metallurgy DivisionNational Institute of Standards and Technology, Technology Administration, US Department of CommerceGaithersburgUSA

Personalised recommendations