Advertisement

Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 43, Issue 14, pp 5017–5019 | Cite as

The effect of ultraviolet (UV) light postcuring on resin hardness and interlaminar shear strength of a glass-fibre/vinylester composite

  • P. CompstonEmail author
  • D. Dexter
Letter

Thermoset resins formulated with a photoinitiator can be rapidly cured through exposure to ultraviolet (UV) light. The UV light excites the photoinitiator, which breaks down to produce radicals that begin catalytic polymerisation of the resin [1]. Cure can be achieved in minutes or seconds, depending on the light intensity, exposure time and resin thickness. For this reason, the use of UV curing resins is established in the coating and ink industries where it has increased productivity and reduced solvent emissions [2, 3].

In contrast, manufacturing processes for fibre-reinforced polymer-matrix composites are characterised by numerous processing stages, long cycle times and hazardous chemical emissions. Thermoset matrix resins are often catalysed with peroxide catalysts. These resins typically require a thermal postcure, after an initial room temperature cure, to increase properties to an acceptable level. This process takes several hours. Composites are attractive for increased use in...

Keywords

Shear Strength Methyl Ethyl Ketone Peroxide Interlaminar Shear Strength Vinyl Ester Resin Pultrusion Process 

References

  1. 1.
    Studer K, Decker C, Beck E, Schwalm R (2003) Prog Organic Coat 48:92. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300–9440(03)00120-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Allen NS (1996) J Photochem Photobiol A 100:101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Maag K, Lenhard W, Loffles H (2000) Prog Organic Coat 40:93. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9440(00)00144-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bannister M (2001) Compos Part A 32:901. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-835X(01)00008-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Britnell DJ, Tucker N, Smith GF, Wong SSF (2003) J Mater Process Tech 138:311. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(03)00091-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Li G, Pourmohamadiam N, Cygan A, Peck J, Helms J, Pang S (2003) Compos Struct 60:73. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-8223(02)00292-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Li G, Ghebreyesus A (2006) Compos Struct 72:105. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2004.10.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Compston P, Schiemer J, Cvetanovska A (2008) Mechanical properties and styrene emission levels of a UV-cured glass-fibre/vinylester composite. Comps Struct. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2008.03.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cvetanovska A, Compston P (2004) J Mater Sci 39:1791. doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JMSC.0000016186.59458.a1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Abadie MJM, Xiong Y, Boey FYC (2003) Eur Polym J 39:1243. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-3057(02)00367-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EngineeringCollege of Engineering and Computer Science, The Australian National UniversityCanberraAustralia

Personalised recommendations