Advertisement

Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 43, Issue 12, pp 4127–4134 | Cite as

Simple methods to fabricate Bioglass®-derived glass–ceramic scaffolds exhibiting porosity gradient

  • Oana BretcanuEmail author
  • Claire Samaille
  • Aldo R. BoccacciniEmail author
Rees Rawlings Festschrift

Abstract

The present paper discusses different processing technologies for fabrication of novel 45S5 Bioglass®-derived glass–ceramic scaffolds with tailored porosity gradient for potential application in bone tissue engineering. Different types of scaffolds with continuous or stepwise gradient of porosity were produced by the foam replication technique, using preformed polyurethane (PU) foams as sacrificial templates. After preforming the PU foams in metallic moulds, they were dipped in a 45S5 Bioglass®-based slurry and subsequently heat treated in a chamber furnace up to 1100 °C. During heating, the organic phase is burned out and the glass sinters and partially crystallises. By using this new approach, Bioglass®-derived glass-ceramic scaffolds with different shapes and porosity profiles were designed. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) showed that all samples have highly interconnected porous structure, with specific porosity gradients. By modifying the shape and dimensions of the metallic mould, bioactive glass–ceramic scaffolds with complex shapes and different degrees of porosity gradient could be obtained.

Keywords

Foam Polyurethane Foam Bioactive Glass Porous Scaffold Continuous Gradient 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was funded with support of the EU Marie Curie fellowship scheme (Grant MEIF-CT-2005-024248).

References

  1. 1.
    Martin I, Miot S, Barbero A, Jakob M, Wendt D (2007) J Biomech 40(4):750CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Roether JA, Boccaccini AR, Hench LL, Maquet V, Gautier S, Jérôme R (2002) Biomaterials 23:3871CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Karageorgiou V, Kaplan D (2005) Biomaterials 26(27):5474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Logeart-Avramoglou D, Anagnostou F, Bizios R et al (2005) J Cell Mol Med 9(1):72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rezwan K, Chen QZ, Blaker JJ, Boccaccini AR (2006) Biomaterials 27:3413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pompe W, Worch H, Epple M et al (2003) Mater Sci Eng A362:40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Suresh S, Mortensen A (1998) Fundamentals of functionally graded materials: processing and thermomechanical behaviour of graded metals and metal-ceramic composites. The University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Harley BA et al (2006) Biomaterials 27:866CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ghosh S, Viana JC, Reis RL et al (2006) Key Eng Mater 309–311:1109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sherwood JK, Riley SL, Palazzolo R et al (2002) Biomaterials 23:4739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Oliveira JM, Rodrigues MT, Silva SS et al (2006) Biomaterials 27:6123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hench LL (1998) J Am Ceram Soc 81:1705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chichoki FR, Trumble KP (1998) J Am Ceram Soc 81:1661Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chung TJ, Neubrand A, Roedel J (2002) Key Eng Mater 206–213:965Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chen QZ, Thompson ID, Boccaccini AR (2006) Biomaterials 27:2414CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of MaterialsImperial College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations