Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 42, Issue 24, pp 9947–9953 | Cite as

Mechanical properties and reactions of PBT/PTW blends

  • Chao Zhang
  • Gance DaiEmail author


The new rubbery poly(ethylene-butylacrylate-glycidyl methacrylate) (PTW) containing epoxy groups was used as a toughener for poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT). The morphology and mechanical property of the PBT/PTW blend was studied. The reactions between PBT and PTW resulted in improvement of toughness, and were affected by the content of PTW. The reaction during the blending process was followed using an internal mixer. The simulated interfacial reaction between PBT and PTW was studied using the ARES rheometer. The complex viscosity curve could be divided into three stages to characterize the interfacial reactions between PBT and PTW at different temperatures. The temperature strongly affected the rates of the interfacial reaction and diffusion. The reaction of the mixture of PBT and PTW in the internal mixer was much faster than that at the simulated interfacial region. Finally, the differences between the simulated interfacial reaction and the reaction during the real processing were discussed.


Interfacial Reaction Epoxy Group Complex Viscosity Glycidyl Methacrylate Viscosity Curve 


  1. 1.
    Kroschwitz JI (2003) Encyclopedia of polymer science and technology. 3rd edn. John Wiley & Sons, Inc, New York, vol 3, p 550, vol 7, p 522, vol 6, p 559 Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Paul DR, Bucknall CB (2000) In: Polymer blends. John Wiley & Sons, Inc, New York, vol 1, p 540, vol 2, p 177Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Phadkle SV (1991) US Patent 5008342Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wang XH, Zhang HX, Wang ZG, Jiang BZ (1997) Polymer 38:1569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Aróstegui A, Nazábal J (2003) J Poly Sci Part B: Poly Phys 41:2236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sun SL, Xu XY, Yang HD, Zhang HX (2005) Polymer 46:7632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Martin P, Devaux J, Legras R, Van Gurp M, Van Duin M (2001) Polymer 42:2463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jeon HK, Kim JK (1998) Macromolecules 31:9273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kim JK, Lee H (1996) Polymer 37:305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cecer A, Greco R, Ragosta G, Scarinzi G, Taglialatela A (1990) Polymer 31:1239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Aróstegui A, Gaztelumendi M, Nazábal J (2001) Polymer 42:9565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Aróstegui A, Nazábal J (2003) Polymer 44:239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kim SJ, Shin BS, Hong JL, Cho WJ, Ha CS (2001) Polymer 42:4073CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    O’Shaughnessy B, Sawhney U (1996) Macromolecules 29:7230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    O’Shaughnessy B, Vavylonis D (1999) Macromolecules 32:1785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jiao J, Kramer EJ, de Vos S, Möller M, Koning C (1999) Macromolecules 32:6261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lyu SP, Cernohous JJ, Bates FS, Macosko CW (1999) Macromolecules 32:106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kim HY, Jeong U, Kim JK (2003) Macromolecules 36:1594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Loyens W, Groeninckx G (2002) Macromol Chem Phys 203:1702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Yu ZZ, Yan C, Aravind D, Dai SC, Mai YW, Yang MS (2004) Macromol Mater Eng 289:763CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Loyens W, Groeninckx G (2003) Polymer 44:123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Raymond AP, Sueand HJ, Yee AF (2000) In: Toughening of plastics: advances in moldeling and experiments, American Chemical Society, Washington DC, p 141Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Chemical EngineeringEast China University of Science and TechnologyShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations