Advertisement

Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 42, Issue 19, pp 8209–8214 | Cite as

Effect of mechanical milling on the corrosion behavior of Al–Zn/Al2O3 composite in NaCl solution

  • T. G. Durai
  • Karabi DasEmail author
  • Siddhartha Das
Article

Abstract

Ceramic particle reinforced aluminum metal matrix composites (MMCs) have resulted in potential use in aerospace and automobile industries. The composites have been processed by mechanical milling followed by traditional powder metallurgy route. The Al crystallite size is reduced to 27 nm after 60 h of milling. Results of the corrosion tests, evaluated using the potentiodynamic method in the NaCl solution, indicate that corrosion of the investigated composite materials depends on the weight fraction of the reinforcing particles. It has been found out, based on the determined anode polarization curves, that the investigated materials are susceptible to pitting corrosion. Moreover, experimental results suggest that the milled composite material Al–Zn/Al2O3p has higher corrosion resistance in the selected environment compared to unmilled composite Al–Zn/Al2O3p. Polarization curves show that the milling procedure improves the composite corrosion resistance in passive conditions. This is illustrated by the corrosion potential, which becomes nobler with milling.

Keywords

Milling Corrosion Resistance Open Circuit Potential Corrosion Test Milling Time 

Notes

Acknowledgement

The financial support received from the Department of Science and Technology, Government of India, is gratefully acknowledged.

References

  1. 1.
    Datta J, Datta S, Banerjee MK, Bandyopadhyay S (2004) Composites: Part A 35:1003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aikin RM Jr (1997) J Organomet 49:35Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Koczak MJ, Premkumar MK (1993) J Min Met Mater Soc 45(1):44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ying DY, Zhang DL (2000) Mater Sci Eng A 286:152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dobrzánski LA, Włodarczyk A, Adamiak M (2005) J Mater Process Technol 162:27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kiourtsidis GE, Skolianos SM, Pavlidou EG (1999) Corros Sci 41:1185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Grosjean M-H, Zidoune M, Roue L, Huot J, Schulz R (2004) Electrochimica Acta 49:2461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kirchheim R, Huang XY, Cui P, Birringer R, Gleiter H (1992) Nanostruct Mater 1:167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Elkedim O, Cao HS, Guay D (2002) J Mater Process Technol 121:383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ashassi-Sorkabi H, Ghasemi Z, Seifzadeh D (2005) Appl Surf Sci 249:408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Badawy WA, Al-KharafiL FM (1997) Corr Sci 39(4):681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sharma SC, Somashekar DR, Satish BM (2001) J Mater Process Technol 118:62CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Metallurgical and Materials EngineeringIndian Institute of TechnologyKharagpurIndia

Personalised recommendations