Advertisement

Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 42, Issue 12, pp 4149–4158 | Cite as

Reaction sintering of intermetallic-reinforced composite materials

  • I. A. MacAskill
  • D. P. BishopEmail author
Article

Abstract

The goal of this research was to explore the powder metallurgy (P/M) processing response of materials based on the Al–Ni system. In doing so, compacts of pure aluminum powder as well as binary Al–Ni blends were prepared, compacted, sintered, and assessed. Research began with fundamental studies on the sintering response of the base aluminum powder. This system demonstrated a poor sintering response overall but did improve at higher temperatures commensurate with a small fraction of a secondary phase that was presumed to be aluminum nitride. In Al–Ni systems sintering temperature had a particularly pronounced effect on the resultant microstructure. At lower temperatures a composite of Al–NiAl3–AlN was formed while higher temperatures yielded one of Al–NiAl3 alone. It was postulated that the exothermicity of NiAl3 formation and the extent of matrix sintering were controlling factors for this behaviour.

Keywords

Sinter Temperature Aluminum Powder Aluminum Nitride Isothermal Hold Sintered Density 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge financial support from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) and Mr. Ian Donaldson, Director of Research and Development, GKN Sinter Metals (Romulus, Michigan, USA). Hans-Claus Neubing (Eckart Granules, Fuerth, Germany) is gratefully acknowledged for his contribution of powders as are Drs. William Caley and Mahesh Chaturvedi (University of Manitoba, Canada) for their assistance with XRD.

References

  1. 1.
    Danninger H, Pottschacher R, Bradac S, Salak A, Seyrkammer J (2005) Powd Metall 48(1):23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zadra M (2001) Int J Powd Metall 37(7):13Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bishop DP, Hofmann B, Couchman KR (2000) In: Ferguson H and Whychell DT (eds) Advances in Powder Metallurgy and Particulate Materials. MPIF, 1(12):87Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sims DM, Bose A, German RM (1988) Metal Powd Rep 43(9):563Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chiu LH, Nagle DC, Bonney LA (1999) Metall Mater Trans A 30A:781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Godlewska E, Szczepanik S, Mania R, Krawiarz J, Kozinski S (2003) Intermetallics 11:307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wegmann MR, Misiolek WZ, German RM (1991) Advances in Powder Metallurgy, vol 2, Part 2. MPIF, p 175Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lee JH, Jung JC, Won CW (2002) J Mater Sci 37:2435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hennessey CH, Caley WF, Kipouros GJ, Bishop DP (2005) Int J Powd Metall 41(1):50Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kondoh K, Kimura A, Watanabe R, (2001) Quart J Jap Weld Soc 19(2):383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schaffer GB, Hall BJ, (2002) Metall Mater Trans A 33A:3279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Selvaduary S, Sheet L (1993) Inst Mater 463Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lee J, Lee I, Kim D, Ahn J, Chung H (2005) J Mater Res 20(3):659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    ASTM International (2005) In: Annual Book of ASTM Standards 2005, Section Two – Nonferrous Metal Products. ASTM International, p 312Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Process Engineering and Applied ScienceDalhousie UniversityHalifaxCanada

Personalised recommendations