The size refinement of Cu crystallites under mechanical processing conditions: a phenomenological modeling approach
- 58 Downloads
- 11 Citations
Abstract
A phenomenological model is developed for describing the kinetics of the crystallite size refinement process of Cu powder under mechanical treatment conditions. Based on the evidence that collisions represent the elementary events of energy transfer, the rate of crystallite size decrease is related on a statistical basis to the amount of powder trapped at each collision, to the number of collisions and to the collision energy. The mathematical approach allows for identifying the approximate functional form of the kinetic curves obtained at largely different impact energies. The values of the apparent kinetic constants and of the model parameters involved can be thus estimated by fitting the model curves to the experimental data. The results obtained provide a deeper insight into the details of the crystallite size refinement process.
Keywords
Crystallite Size Powder Particle Impact Energy Average Crystallite Size Milling ToolNotes
Acknowledgements
Financial support has been given by the University of Cagliari and the University of Sassari.
References
- 1.Siegel RW, Hu E, Roco MC (eds) (1999) In Nanostructure science and technology. WTEC, Loyola College, MarylandGoogle Scholar
- 2.Suryanarayana C (2001) Prog Mater Sci 46:1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Khina BB, Froes FH (1996) J Met 48:36Google Scholar
- 4.Delogu F, Schiffini L, Cocco G (2001) Phil Mag A 81:1917CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Delogu F, Mulas G, Schiffini L, Cocco G (2004) Mater Sci Eng A 382:280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Delogu F, Cocco G (2005) Mater Sci Eng A 422:198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Manai G, Delogu F, Schiffini L, Cocco G (2004) J Mater Sci 39:1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Courtney TH (1995) Mater Trans JIM 36:110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Maurice DR, Courtney TH (1996) Metall Mater Trans A 27A:1981CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Buchholtz V, Pöschel T (1997) In Wolf DE, Grassberger P (eds) Friction, arching, contact dynamics. World Scientific, Singapore, p 265Google Scholar
- 11.Makse HA, Johnson DL, Schwartz LM (2000) Phys Rev Lett 84:4160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Corwin EI, Jaeger HM, Nagel SR (2005) Nature 435:1075CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Szabò ZG (1969) In Bamford CH, Tipper CFH (eds) Comprehensive chemical kinetics. The theory of kinetics, vol. 2. Elsevier Science Publishers, Oxford, p 1Google Scholar
- 14.Lutterotti L, Ceccato R, Dal Maschio R, Pagani E (1998) Mater Sci Forum 87:278–281Google Scholar
- 15.Warren BE, Averbach BL (1950) J Appl Phys 21:595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Wagner CNJ (1966) Local atomic arrangements studied by X-ray diffraction. Gordon and Breach, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 17.Hall WH, Williamson GK (1951) Proc Phys Soc 64B:937CrossRefGoogle Scholar