Advertisement

Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 42, Issue 12, pp 4316–4324 | Cite as

Experimental study of the quasi-static and dynamic behaviour of cork under compressive loading

  • Celina Pires GameiroEmail author
  • José Cirne
  • Gérard Gary
Article

Abstract

Cork is a natural cellular material with increasing industrial applications due to its remarkable combination of properties. Its mechanical behaviour explains why it is often used for applications like sealing, packaging, insulation, vibration control, weight reduction, flotation, sound damping, etc. However, the mechanical behaviour of cork when subjected to impact has not been well investigated yet since the studies described in the literature generally focus strain rates below 10−1 s−1. Understanding the behaviour of cork at high rates of deformation becomes imperative when considering applications such as crash protection. Hence, in the present work, the authors compare the quasi-static and dynamic response of four types of cork when compressed axially at strain rates from 10−3 s−1 to 600 s−1. Data from the Split-Hopkinson Pressure Bars are used to generate stress–strain curves for natural and agglomerate cork samples, and the results are discussed in terms of the cellular structure of cork.

Keywords

Cell Wall Material Plateau Stress Cork Cell Natural Cork Cork Sample 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) who financially supported this work, through the Program POCTI/35907/EME/2000 (Portuguese Government and FEDER) and SFRH/BD/18964/2004, and to ROCAP for providing the cork samples.

References

  1. 1.
    Gibson LJ, Ashby MF (1997) Cellular solids: structure and properties. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Deshpande VS, Fleck NA (2000) Int J Impact Engng 24:277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Paul A, Ramamurty U (2000) Mat Sci Eng A Struct A281:1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Santosa P, Wierzbicki T, Hanssen AG, Langseth M (2000) Int J Impact Engng 24:509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fortes MA, Rosa ME, Pereira H (2004) A Cortiça. IST Press, LisboaGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Anjos O, Pina P, Rosa ME (1997) In: Proceedings of European conference on cork oak and cork. Centro de Estudos Florestais—Instituto Superior de Agronomia, Lisboa, p 317Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fortes MA, Nogueira MT (1989) Mat Sci Eng A Struct A122:227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gibson LJ, Easterling KE, Ashby MF (1981) Proc R Soc Lond A377:99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hopkinson B (1914) Phil Trans R Soc Lond A213:437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kolsky H (1949) Proc R Soc Lond B 62:676Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gary G (2001) In: Nowacki WK, Klepaczko JR (eds) Trends in mechanics of materials, vol 3, Poland, p 179Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pochhammer L (1876) J für die Reine Angewandte Mathematik 81:324Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chree C (1889) Cambridge Phil Soc 14:250Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zhao H, Gary G, Klepaczko JR (1997) Int J Impact Engng 19:310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Klintworth JW (1989) Dynamic crushing of cellular solids (PhD Thesis, Department of Engineering, University of CambridgeGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Celina Pires Gameiro
    • 1
    Email author
  • José Cirne
    • 1
  • Gérard Gary
    • 2
  1. 1.CEMUC—Departamento de Engenharia MecânicaFaculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia da Universidade de CoimbraCoimbraPortugal
  2. 2.Laboratoire de Mécanique des SolidesEcole PolytechniquePalaiseauFrance

Personalised recommendations