Advertisement

Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 42, Issue 16, pp 7031–7041 | Cite as

Direct assembly process: a novel fabrication technique for large strain ionic polymer transducers

  • Barbar J. AkleEmail author
  • Matthew D. Bennett
  • Donald J. Leo
  • Kenton B. Wiles
  • James E. McGrath
Article

Abstract

Ionic polymer transducers (IPT) consist of an ion-exchange membrane plated with flexible conductive electrodes on their outer surface. Compared to other types of electromechanical transducers, ionomeric transducers have the advantage of high-strain output (>9%), low-voltage operation (<5 V), and high sensitivity in the charge-sensing mode. A novel fabrication technique for ionic polymer transducers named the Direct Assembly Process (DAP) was developed in this paper. The DAP allows the use of any type of ionomer, diluent, and conducting powder in the transducer, and permits the exploration of any novel ionomeric design. In this paper the effect of diluent content of the IPT, electrode thickness, and composition were optimized in term of maximum peak strain and strain rate generated by an IPT. Decreasing viscosity and increasing polarity and content of the diluent were demonstrated to increase the strain rate of an IPT. The thickness of the electrode was varied and correlated with the maximum strain generated due to a 2 V step input. This study also demonstrated that RuO2 composition has an optimal loading of 42 vol%, while SWNT electrodes have an optimal performance at around 30 vol%.

Keywords

Ionic Liquid Electric Double Layer Percolation Threshold RuO2 LiBH4 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgement

This work was partially supported by the U.S. Army Research Laboratory and U.S. Army Research Office under Contract/Grant number DAAD19-02-1-0275 Macromolecular Architecture for Performance (MAP) MURI.

References

  1. 1.
    Shahinpour M, Bar-Cohen Y, Simpson JO, Smith J (1998) Smart Mater Struct 7(6):R15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sadeghipour K, Salomon R, Neogi S (1992) Smart Mater Struct 1:3445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Oguro K, Kawami Y, Takenaka H (1992) J Micromachine Soc 5:27Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Akle JB, Bennett M, Leo JD (2006) Sensor Actuat A Phys 126(1):173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kim K, Shahinpoor M (2003) Smart Mater Struct 12(1):65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Akle B, Hickner M, Leo D, Mcgrath J (2005) J Mater Sci 40:3715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nemat-Nasser S (2002) J Appl Phys 92(5):2899CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Oguro K, Fujiwara N, Asaka K, Onishi K, Sewa S (1999) In: Proceeding of the SPIE smart structures and materials conference, vol 3669, pp 63–71Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Leo D, Farinholt K, Wallmersperger T (2005) In: Proceeding of the SPIE smart structures and materials conference, vol 5759, pp 170–181Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kim K, Shahinpoor M (2003) Smart Mater Struct 12:65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shahinpoor M, Kim K (2002) Sensor Actuat Phys 96:125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shahinpoor M, Kim K (2002) Polymer J 43:797CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Taegeun N, Yong Suk T, Jae-Do N, Jae Wook J, Hoon Mo K, Hyoukryeol C, Sang Sik B (2001) In: Proceeding of the SPIE smart structures and materials conference, vol 4329, pp 458–465Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Akle B (2005) PhD Thesis, Virginia TechGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Akle B, Leo D (2006) Sensor Atuat Phys (in press)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Akle JB, Leo JD. J Intel Mat Syst Str (to appear)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Supriya L, Akle B, Leo D, Claus R (2005) IEEE Sensors J (in press)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bennett M, Leo D (2003) Smart Mater Struct 12:424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tamagawa H, Nogata F, Watanabe T, Abe A, Yagasaki K, Jin JY (2003) J Mater Sci 38:1039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bonhote P, Paula Dias A, Papageorgiou N, Kalyanasundaram K, Gratzel M (1996) Inorg Chem 35:1168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bennett M, Leo D (2004) Sensor Actuat Phys 115:79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Stauffer D, Aharony A (1992) Introduction to percolation theory, vol 4. Taylor and Francis, LondonGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bennett M, Leo D (2005) In: Proceeding of the SPIE smart structures and materials conference, vol 5759, pp 506–517Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Endo M, Takeda T, Kim YJ, Koshiba K, Ishii K (2001) Carbon Sci 1:117Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Barbar J. Akle
    • 1
    Email author
  • Matthew D. Bennett
    • 1
  • Donald J. Leo
    • 1
  • Kenton B. Wiles
    • 2
  • James E. McGrath
    • 2
  1. 1.Mechanical Engineering DepartmentCenter for Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, Virginia TechBlacksburgUSA
  2. 2.Department of ChemistryMacromolecules and Interfaces Institute, Virginia TechBlacksburgUSA

Personalised recommendations