Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 42, Issue 12, pp 4372–4383 | Cite as

The effect of microstructure on the permeability of metallic foams

  • Mamoun MedrajEmail author
  • Eric Baril
  • Virendra Loya
  • Louis-Philippe Lefebvre


Pressure drop was measured across complex and simple structure metallic foams at different velocity ranges using air as working fluid. Darcian and non-Darcian permeability parameters, K and C, were determined by fitting experimental data with widely accepted quadratic model of Hazen-Dupuit-Darcy. Generally, the experimental results are in good agreement with the model. The differences in K and C values between the two types of metallic foams are due to the different microstructure. For the simple structure specimens, permeability K increased whereas non-Darcian permeability C decreased with increasing pore diameter. The effect of pore size on the permeability of complex structure metallic foams seems to be opposite to that observed with the simple structure specimens and to results reported by other researchers on other porous medium. This discrepancy mainly stems from the differences in window concentration in addition to some heterogeneity in the foam that impeded the gas flow on one side of the specimens. The difference in pressure drop observed in the different metallic foams is due to combined effect of K and C. However, for simple structure foams, K and C could be predicted by Ergun-like model using appropriate values for the empirical constants. The permeability K is significantly affected by pore size and porosity. The quadratic term of Hazen-Dupuit-Darcy equation is mainly due to the inertia of the flow and partially to the drag exerted by the microstructure of the metallic foam. For both foams, as the porosity increases, pressure drop decreases and permeability, K, increases. The introduction of the open cross sectional area term enabled better understanding of the permeability of metallic foams with intricate morphologies.


Foam Porous Medium Pressure Drop Aluminum Foam Relative Standard Deviation 



The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support received from NSERC and NATEQ. The authors would also like to thank NRC-IMI, Boucherville, Quebec, Canada and RECEMAT International, Netherlands for providing the samples.


  1. 1.
    Lage JL (1998) In: Ingham BD, Pop I (eds) Transport phenomena in porous media. pp 1–30Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ward JC (1964) ASCE J Hydraulics Division 90(HY5):1Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Beavers GS, Sparrow EM, Rodenz DE (1973) J Appl Mech 40(3):655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Antohe BV, Lage JL, Price DC, Weber RM (1997) J Fluids Eng 119(2):405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Davis PA, Olague NE, Goodrich MT (1992) Adv Water Resour 15:175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Boomsma K, Poulikakos D (2002) J Fluids Eng 124(1):263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Scheidegger AE (1974) The physics of flow through porous media. 3rd edn., University of Toronto Press, ISBN: 0-8020-1849-1Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Diedericks GPJ, Du Plessis JP (1997) Math Eng Industry 6(3):133Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Beckermann C, Viskanta R (1987) Int J Heat Mass Transfer 30(7):1547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tadrist L, Miscevic M (2004) Exp Thermal Fluid Sci 28(2):193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Paek JW, Kang BH, Kim SY, Hyun JM (2000) Int J Thermophys 21(2):453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Innocentini DM, Salvini Vania (1999) Mater Res (Sao Carlos, Brazil) 2(4):283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Innocentini DM, Victor C (2001) J Am Ceramic Soc 84(5):941CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bhattacharya A, Mahajan RL (2002) Int J Heat Mass Transfer 45(5):1017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Du Plessis P (1994) Chem Eng Sci 49(21):3545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fourie JG, Du Plessis P (2002) Chem Eng Sci 57(14):2781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Boomsma K, Poulikakos D, Ventikos Y (2003) Int J Heat Fluid Flow 24(6):825CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Despois JF, Mortensen A (2005) Acta Materialia 53(5):1381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fand RM, Kim BYK, Lam ACC, Phan RT (1987) ASME J Fluids Eng 109(3):268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Innocentini DM, Salvini VR, Pandolfelli VC, Coury JR (1999) Am Ceramic Soc Bull 78(9):78Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Innocentini DM, Antunes WL, Baumgartner JB, Seville JPK, Coury JR (1999) Mater Sci Forum 299–300(5):19Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rumer RR, Drinker P (1966) J Hydraulic Div., Am Soc Civil Engineers 89(6):193Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Banhart J, Baumeister J (1998) J Mater Sci 33(6):1431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    ReceMat International, “RECEMAT® metal foam: extremely porous material”,, on 28th December, 2005
  25. 25.
    Gauthier M, Lefebvre L, Thomas Y, Bureau M (2004) Mater Manufact Process 19(5):793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Dukhan N, Alvarez A, (2004) In: Proceedings of the 2004 ASME international mechanical engineering congress and exposition, Anaheim, California USA, November 13–20 pp 595–601Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mamoun Medraj
    • 1
    Email author
  • Eric Baril
    • 2
  • Virendra Loya
    • 1
  • Louis-Philippe Lefebvre
    • 2
  1. 1.Mechanical Engineering DepartmentConcordia UniversityMontréalCanada
  2. 2.NRC-IMIBouchervilleCanada

Personalised recommendations