Advertisement

Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 41, Issue 18, pp 6001–6005 | Cite as

13C CP/MAS NMR study of a wood/phenol–formaldehyde resin bondline

  • Marie-Pierre G. Laborie
  • Charles E. Frazier
Article

Abstract

The dynamics and interactions of a wood powder/phenol–formaldehyde (PF) resin composite are evaluated by solid-state 13C NMR. A 13C labeled and perdeuterated PF resin, with low molecular weight distribution, is synthesized and cured in the neat state and also in combination with yellow-poplar wood powder. The 13C NMR spectral features and cross-polarization dynamics of the PF hydroxymethyl and methylene nuclei are compared in the neat resin and in the wood powder composite. In the composite, a downfield shift of the PF hydroxyl bearing carbons suggests secondary interactions between the PF resin and wood. In addition, the PF resin methylene and hydroxymethyl carbons exhibit slower CP dynamics compared to the neat resin. Lower resin CP rates in the composite indicate lower molecular rigidity of the resin in presence of wood compared to the neat cured PF resin.

Keywords

Wood Powder Neat Resin Wood Polymer Dibenzyl Ether Neat State 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Financial support from the Center for Adhesive and Sealant Science and technical support from Tom Glass for NMR measurements, all at Virginia Tech, are greatly appreciated. The solution NMR spectra have been processed with MestRe-C software.

References

  1. 1.
    Nearn WT (1974) Wood Sci 6:285Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Marcinko JJ, Devathala S, Rinaldi PL, Bao S (1998) For Prod J 48:81Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Marcinko JJ, Rinaldi PL, Bao S (1999) For Prod J 49:75Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Schmidt RG, Frazier CE (2000) Comp Interfaces 7:93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Frazier CE, Ni J (1998) Int J Adhes Adhes 18:81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gindl W, Schöbert T, Jeronimidis G (2004) Int J Adhes Adhes 24:279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Das S, Frazier CE (2003) In Anderson GL (ed) Proceedings of the 26th annual meeting of the Adhesion Society, Inc., Myrtle Beach SC., February 2003. Adhesion Society, Blacksburg, VA, p 209Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schmidt RG, Laborie M-P, Frazier CE (2000) Holzforschung 54:98Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Laborie M-P, Frazier CE (2000) In Anderson GL (ed) Proceedings of the 23rd annual meeting of the Adhesion Society, Inc., Myrtle Beach SC., February 2000. Adhesion Society, Blacksburg, VA, p 291Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Werstler DD (1986) Polymer 27:750CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zhang X, Solomon DH (1994) Macromolecules 27:4919CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chuang IS, Maciel GE (1991) Macromolecules 24:1025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    He G, Riedl B (2004) Wood Sci Technol 38:69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fulber C, Demco DE, Blumich B (1996) Solid State Nucl Magnet Resonance 6:213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mehring M (1983) In Principle of High Resolution NMR in Solids. Springer-Verlag, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Schmidt RG, Frazier CE (1998) Wood Fib Sci 30:250Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Wood Materials and Engineering Laboratory, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Washington State UniversityPullmanUSA
  2. 2.Wood-Based Composites Center, Department of Wood Science and Forest ProductsVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityBlacksburgUSA

Personalised recommendations