Magnetically controlled microstructure evolution in non-ferromagnetic metals
- 113 Downloads
The microstructure evolution during grain growth in magnetically anisotropic materials can be affected by a magnetic field due to an additional driving force for grain boundary motion which arises from a difference in magnetic free energy density between differently oriented grains. Therefore each grain of a polycrystal, exposed to a magnetic field, is inclined to grow or to shrink by a magnetic force depending on the orientation of the respective grain and its surrounding neighbors with regard to the field direction. A theoretical analysis of the grain growth kinetics in the presence of an external magnetic field reveals that magnetically affected grain growth may result in an orientation distribution that favours grains with a lower magnetic free energy density. As it is experimentally demonstrated on polycrystalline zinc, titanium and zirconium, the crystallographic texture in magnetically anisotropic non-magnetic materials can be effectively changed and controlled by means of annealing in a magnetic field. EBSD-analysis revealed that the observed asymmetrical texture after magnetic annealing is due to a large extent to a significant difference in the number of grains that make up different texture components. The results of computer simulations of magnetically affected grain growth in 2-D polycrystals are in a good agreement with theoretical predictions and experimental findings.
KeywordsMagnetic Field Field Direction Triple Junction Texture Component Boundary Motion
The authors express their gratitude to the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft for financial support (Grant MO 848/6-1). Part of this work was performed at the National High Magnetic Field Laboratory, which is supported by NSF (Cooperative Agreement No. DMR-0084173), by the State of Florida and by the DOE. Helpful and stimulated discussions with Profs. G. Gottstein, L. S. Shvindlerman, V. Yu. Novikov, C. Krill and P. Streitenberger are gratefully acknowledged. L.A.B.-M. conveys his thanks to the Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst (DAAD) for his Ph.D. stipend.
- 2.T Watanabe (2001) In: Gottstein G, Molodov DA (eds) Recrystallization and grain growth. Springer, Berlin, p 11Google Scholar
- 9.Konijnenberg PJ, Molodov DA, Gottstein G (2005) In: NHMFL 2004 Annual Research Review. NHMFL, Tallahassee, p 15. http://www.magnet.fsu.edu/publications/2004annualreport/reports/2004-NHMFL-Report137.pdfGoogle Scholar
- 15.Molodov DA, Konijnenberg PJ, Bozzolo N, will be publishedGoogle Scholar
- 16.Weisstein EW In: Mathworld – a Wolfram web resource. http://mathworld.wolfram.com/SpherePointPicking.htmlGoogle Scholar
- 18.Novikov VYU (1999) Acta Mater 47:4705Google Scholar
- 21.Von Neumann J (1952) In: Metal interfaces. American Society for Testing Materials, Cleveland, p 108Google Scholar
- 22.Volkenshtein NV, Galoshina EV, Panikovskaya EB (1975) Sov Phys JETP 40:730Google Scholar
- 27.Barrales-Mora LA, Mohles V, Konijnenberg PJ, Molodov DA (2006) Comp Mater Sci In pressGoogle Scholar