Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 41, Issue 21, pp 7025–7032 | Cite as

Effect of powder treatment on the crystallization behaviour and phase evolution of Al2O3–High ZrO2 nanocomposites

  • Raghunath P. Rana
  • Swadesh K. Pratihar
  • Santanu BhattacharyyaEmail author


Al2O3–ZrO2 composites containing nominally equal volume fraction of Al2O3 and ZrO2 have been synthesized through combined gel-precipitation technique. Subsequently the gels were subjected to three different post gel processing treatments like ultrasonication, ultrasonication followed by water washing and ultrasonication followed by alcohol washing. It was observed that while in unwashed samples crystallization took place at low temperature, crystallization was delayed in the washed gels. The phase transition of ZrO2 in the calcined gels followed the sequence; amorphous → cubic ZrO2 → tetragonal ZrO2 → monoclinic ZrO2. On the other hand, phase transition in alumina followed the sequence amorphous to γ-Al2O3, the transition taking place at 650 °C. No α-Al2O3 could be detected even after calcination at 950 °C. However, all the sintered samples had α-Al2O3. In spite of high linear shrinkage (19–21%) during sintering, the sintered sample had density of only above 70% for all the four varieties of the powders. However, in spite of the low sintered density of the pellets, 31% tetragonal zirconia could be retained after sintering at 1400 °C and it reduced to about 16% at 1600 °C.


Sintered Sample Sintered Density ZrOCl2 Densification Behaviour Tetragonal ZrO2 



This work is financially supported by Department of Science & Technology, Government of India.


  1. 1.
    Claussen N (1976) J Am Ceram Soc 59:49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yuan LJ, Yen TS (1990) J Am Ceram Soc 75:2576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Novak S, Kosmac T, Ribitsch V (1995) Mat Sci Eng A 194:235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Freim J, Mckittrick J (1998) J Am Ceram Soc 81:1773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Srdic VV, Radonijc L (1997) J Am Ceram Soc 80:2056CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jayaseelan D, Nishikawa T, Awaji H, Gnanam FD (1998) Mat Sci Eng A 256:265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Prabhu GB, Bourell DL (1995) Nanostruct Mat 5:727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Balmer ML, Lange FF, Jayaraman V, Levi CG (1995) J Am Ceram Soc 78:489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bhattacharyya S, Pratihar SK, Sinha RK, Behera RC, Ganguly RI (2002) Mat Lett 53:425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cullity BD (1977) Elements of X-ray diffraction. Addison–Wesley Pub. Co. Inc., MAGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Norman CJ, Goulding PA, Mcalpine I (1994) Catal Today 29:313Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Saraswathi V, Rao GVN, Rama Rao GV (1987) J Mat Sci 22:2529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kaliszewski MS, Heuer AH (1990) J Am Ceram Soc 73:1504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Schmid HK (1987) J Am Ceram Soc 70:367CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Raghunath P. Rana
    • 1
  • Swadesh K. Pratihar
    • 1
  • Santanu Bhattacharyya
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Ceramic EngineeringNational Institute of TechnologyRourkelaIndia

Personalised recommendations