Advertisement

Exploring Low-Cost Mobile Manipulation for Elder Care Within a Community Based Setting

  • Caio Mucchiani
  • Pamela Cacchione
  • Wilson Torres
  • Michelle J. Johnson
  • Mark Yim
Article
  • 103 Downloads

Abstract

This paper identifies tasks an affordable mobile manipulator service robot could do to benefit older adults’ independence in a supportive apartment living facility, and a series of tests validating the highest ranked tasks. Previous deployments considered a mobile only robotic base, performing exercises through walking encouragement and hydration by water delivery, both followed by pain assessment and are briefly described. Current tests investigated the efficacy of mobile manipulation tasks by adapting a novel, low-cost telescopic robotic arm to the same mobile base, with aspects of human-robot interaction investigated through a physical interactive game with the older adults. All deployments took place at a Program of All-inclusive Care (PACE) center and interactions were evaluated by two observers, along with post-interaction surveys with the older adults. Previous work on elder care robotics is discussed. Results of the mobile manipulation deployments, along with design guidelines are presented. Future work includes the development of a new mobile manipulator capable of performing the investigated tasks with a greater level of autonomy and efficiency.

Keywords

Elder care robotics Human robot interaction Mobile manipulation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    Spijker, J., MacInnes, J.: Population ageing: the timebomb that isn’t?. Bmj 347, f6598 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Robinson, H., MacDonald, B., Kerse, N., Broadbent, E.: The psychosocial effects of a companion robot: a randomized controlled trial. J. Am. Med. Dir. Assoc. 14(9), 661–667 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Banks, M.R., Willoughby, L.M., Banks, W.A.: Animal-assisted therapy and loneliness in nursing homes: use of robotic versus living dogs. J. Am. Med. Dir. Assoc. 9(3), 173–177 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    King, C. -H., Chen, T.L., Jain, A., Kemp, C.C.: Towards an assistive robot that autonomously performs bed baths for patient hygiene. In: 2010 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS), pp. 319–324. IEEE (2010)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pineau, J., Montemerlo, M., Pollack, M., Roy, N., Thrun, S.: Towards robotic assistants in nursing homes: Challenges and results. Robot. Auton. Syst. 42(3-4), 271–281 (2003)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Smarr, C. -A., Mitzner, T.L., Beer, J.M., Prakash, A., Chen, T.L., Kemp, C.C., Rogers, W.A.: Domestic robots for older adults: attitudes, preferences, and potential. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 6(2), 229–247 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    McColl, D., Nejat, G.: Meal-time with a socially assistive robot and older adults at a long-term care facility. Journal of Human-Robot Interaction 2(1), 152–171 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Broekens, J., Heerink, M., Rosendal, H., et al.: Assistive social robots in elderly care: a review. Gerontechnology 8(2), 94–103 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Feil-Seifer, D., Mataric, M.J.: Defining socially assistive robotics. In: 9th international conference on rehabilitation robotics ICORR 2005, pp. 465–468. IEEE (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Johnson, M.J., Johnson, M.A., Sefcik, J.S., Cacchione, P.Z., Mucchiani, C., Lau, T., Yim, M.: Task and design requirements for an affordable mobile service robot for elder care in an all-inclusive care for elders assisted-living setting. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 2017, 1–20 (2017)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sefcik, J.S., Johnson, M.J., Yim, M., Lau, T., Vivio, N., Mucchiani, C., Cacchione, P.Z.: Stakeholders’ perceptions sought to inform the development of a low-cost mobile robot for older adults: A qualitative descriptive study. Clin. Nurs. Res. 27(1), 61–80 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mucchiani, C., Sharma, S., Johnson, M., Sefcik, J., Vivio, N., Huang, J., Cacchione, P., Johnson, M., Rai, R., Canoso, A., et al.: Evaluating older adults’ interaction with a mobile assistive robot. In: IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems IROS (2017)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Louie, W.-Y. G., Li, J., Vaquero, T., Nejat, G.: A focus group study on the design considerations and impressions of a socially assistive robot for long-term care. In: 2014 RO-MAN: The 23rd IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication, pp. 237–242. IEEE (2014)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sabanovic, S., Bennett, C.C., Chang, W.-L., Huber, L.: Paro robot affects diverse interaction modalities in group sensory therapy for older adults with dementia. In: 2013 IEEE international conference on rehabilitation robotics (ICORR), pp. 1–6. IEEE (2013)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Libin, A., Cohen-Mansfield, J.: Therapeutic robocat for nursing home residents with dementia: preliminary inquiry. American Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease & Other Dementias\(^{{\circledR }}\) 19(2), 111–116 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tapus, A., Tapus, C., Mataric, M.J.: The use of socially assistive robots in the design of intelligent cognitive therapies for people with dementia. In: ICORR IEEE international conference on rehabilitation robotics, 2009, pp. 924–929. IEEE (2009)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tapus, A., Tapus, C., Mataric, M.: Music therapist robot for people suffering from dementia: Longitudinal study. Alzheimer’s & Dementia:, The Journal of the Alzheimer’s Association 5(4), P338 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chan, J., Nejat, G.: Promoting engagement in cognitively stimulating activities using an intelligent socially assistive robot. In: IEEE/ASME international conference on advanced intelligent mechatronics (AIM), pp. 533–538. IEEE (2010)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Begum, M., Wang, R., Huq, R., Mihailidis, A.: Performance of daily activities by older adults with dementia: The role of an assistive robot. In: 2013 IEEE international conference on rehabilitation robotics (ICORR), pp. 1–8 IEEE (2013)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Takagi, M., Takahashi, Y., Komeda, T.: A universal mobile robot for assistive tasks. In: ICORR IEEE international conference on rehabilitation robotics, 2009, pp. 524–528. IEEE (2009)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Solis, J., Teshome, T.D., De la Rosa, J.P.: Towards developing a multipurpose assistive vehicle robot capable of providing assistance to caregivers and support to elderly people. In: IEEE international conference on automation science and engineering (CASE), pp. 1145–1150. IEEE (2015)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jayawardena, C., Kuo, I. -H., Broadbent, E., MacDonald, B.A.: Socially assistive robot healthbot: Design, implementation, and field trials. IEEE Syst. J. 10(3), 1056–1067 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Jayawardena, C., Kuo, I., Datta, C., Stafford, R., Broadbent, E., MacDonald, B.: Design, implementation and field tests of a socially assistive robot for the elderly: Healthbot version 2. In: 2012 4th IEEE RAS & EMBS international conference on biomedical robotics and biomechatronics (BioRob), pp. 1837–1842. IEEE (2012)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gross, H. -M., Schroeter, C., Mueller, S., Volkhardt, M., Einhorn, E., Bley, A., Martin, C., Langner, T., Merten, M.: Progress in developing a socially assistive mobile home robot companion for the elderly with mild cognitive impairment. In: IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS), pp. 2430–2437. IEEE (2011)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Canal, G., Alenya, G., Torras, C.: A taxonomy of preferences for physically assistive robotsGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Remazeilles, A., Leroux, C., Chalubert, G.: Sam: a robotic butler for handicapped people. In: The 17th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication, RO- MAN 2008, pp. 315–321. IEEE (2008)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Van der Loos, H.M., Wagner, J.J., Smaby, N., Chang, K., Madrigal, O., Leifer, L.J., Khatib, O.: Provar assistive robot system architecture. In: 1999 Proceedings IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, vol. 1, pp. 741–746. IEEE (1999)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Taipalus, T., Kosuge, K.: Development of service robot for fetching objects in home environment. In: 2005 Proceedings IEEE international symposium on computational intelligence in robotics and automation, CIRA 2005, pp. 451–456. IEEE (2005)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ciocarlie, M., Hsiao, K., Leeper, A., Gossow, D.: Mobile manipulation through an assistive home robot. In: 2012 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS), pp. 5313–5320. IEEE (2012)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Reiser, U., Connette, C., Fischer, J., Kubacki, J., Bubeck, A., Weisshardt, F., Jacobs, T., Parlitz, C., Hagelë, M., Verl, A.: Care-o-bot3 - creating a product vision for service robot applications by integrating design and technology. In: 2009 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems, pp. 1992–1998 (2009)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Bethell, H.: The health benefits of exercise for older people, GM: Midlife & Beyond (2010)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kaneshige, Y., Nihei, M., Fujie, M.G.: Development of new mobility assistive robot for elderly people with body functional control. In: The 1st IEEE/RAS-EMBS international conference on biomedical robotics and biomechatronics, 2006. BioRob 2006, pp. 118–123 IEEE (2006)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Fasola, J., Mataric, M.J.: Robot exercise instructor: A socially assistive robot system to monitor and encourage physical exercise for the elderly. In: RO-MAN, 2010 IEEE, pp. 416–421. IEEE (2010)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Sheu, F. -R., Lee, Y. -L., Hsu, H. -T., Chen, N. -S.: Effects of gesture-based fitness games on functional fitness of the elders. In: IEEE 15th international conference on advanced learning technologies (ICALT), pp. 158–160. IEEE (2015)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Jimison, H., Pavel, M.: Embedded assessment algorithms within home-based cognitive computer game exercises for elders. In: 28th annual international conference of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society, 2006 EMBS’06, pp. 6101–6104. IEEE (2006)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Lunardini, F., Basilico, N., Ambrosini, E., Essenziale, J., Mainetti, R., Pedrocchi, A., Daniele, K., Marcucci, M., Mari, D., Ferrante, S., et al.: Exergaming for balance training, transparent monitoring, and social inclusion of community-dwelling elderly. In: 2017 IEEE 3rd international forum on research and technologies for society and industry (RTSI), pp. 1–5. IEEE (2017)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Lim, J.H., Zhan, A., Ko, J., Terzis, A., Szanton, S., Gitlin, L.: A closed-loop approach for improving the wellness of low-income elders at home using game consoles. IEEE Commun. Mag. 50(1), 44–51 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Heerink, M., Kröse, B., Evers, V., Wielinga, B.: Assessing acceptance of assistive social agent technology by older adults: the almere model. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 2(4), 361–375 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Collins, F., Yim, M.: Design of a spherical robot arm with the spiral zipper prismatic joint. In: 2016 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA), pp. 2137–2143. IEEE (2016)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Folstein, M.F., Folstein, S.E., McHugh, P.R.: Mini-mental state: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J. Psychiatr. Res. 12(3), 189–198 (1975)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Taggart, W., Turkle, S., Kidd, C.D.: An interactive robot in a nursing home: Preliminary remarks. Towards Social Mechanisms of Android Science 2005, 56–61 (2005)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Abdollahi, H., Mollahosseini, A., Lane, J.T., Mahoor, M.H.: A pilot study on using an intelligent life-like robot as a companion for elderly individuals with dementia and depression. In: 2017 IEEE-RAS 17th international conference on humanoid robotics (Humanoids), pp. 541–546. IEEE (2017)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Shiomi, M., Iio, T., Kamei, K., Sharma, C., Hagita, N.: Effectiveness of social behaviors for autonomous wheelchair robot to support elderly people in japan. PLOS ONE 05, 1–15 (2015)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.PhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations