Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing

, Volume 30, Issue 3, pp 1319–1333 | Cite as

Design of adaptable pin configuration machine bed optimized with genetic approach for sheet metal cutting process

  • K. Vijay AnandEmail author
  • S. Udhayakumar


This paper proposes a novel design of machine bed used in laser, plasma and abrasive water jet (AWJ) cutting machines. During sheet metal cutting process, the laser/plasma beam pierces the sheet and further causes damage to the support bed. In contrast to the existing industrial practice of using fixed type support bed, the proposed adjustable pin type design bed adaptively provides support to the sheet by considering the parts layout that is being cut. In this design, the bed is formed with adjustable slats, in which the pins are inserted into the holes of the slats. By combining the dimensional data of machine bed and parts layout, an effective pin configuration is generated. The slats and position of the pins are represented in terms of genetic strings. The near optimal pin configuration is generated through a customized genetic algorithm. The objective is to minimize the damage caused by the tool to the bed and also to provide effective support to the different geometrical parts based on its centroid location. The effectiveness of the proposed approach is tested by combining the data of the bed and its different parts of the layout with irregular geometries. The results are promising and the uniqueness of the proposed approach is illustrated with different test cases.


Sheet metal cutting Laser cutting Plasma cutting Genetic algorithm Life of bed slats Maintenance 


  1. Anand, K. V., & Babu, A. R. (2015). Heuristic and genetic approach for nesting of two-dimensional rectangular shaped parts with common cutting edge concept for laser cutting and profile blanking processes. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 80, 111–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Babu, A. R., & Babu, N. R. (1999). Effective nesting of rectangular parts in multiple rectangular sheets using genetic and heuristic algorithms. International Journal of Production Research, 37(7), 1625–1643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bowman, M. (2014). Sheet metal work—Crowood Metalworking Guides. Marlborough: The Crowood Press Ltd.Google Scholar
  4. Buchfink, G.(2006). Fascination of sheet metal: A material of limitless possibilities.,1st edn. Vogel Buchverlag, Würzburg.Google Scholar
  5. Chaki, S., Bathe, R. N., Ghosal, S., & Padmanabham, G. (2015). Multi-objective optimisation of pulsed Nd: YAG laser cutting process using integrated ANN–NSGAII model. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing. doi: 10.1007/s10845-015-1100-2.
  6. Fagan, M. (2008). Method and system for eliminating external piercing in NC cutting of nested parts. United States patent US, 7,469,620.Google Scholar
  7. Goldberg, D. E. (2014). Genetic algorithms in search, optimization and machine learning. New Delhi, India: Dorling Kindersley (India) Pvt. Ltd.Google Scholar
  8. Hayasi, M. T., & Asiabanpour, B. (2013). A new adaptive slicing approach for the fully dense freeform fabrication (FDFF) process. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 1–12.Google Scholar
  9. Karagöz, S., & Yıldız, A. R. (2017). A comparison of recent metaheuristic algorithms for crashworthiness optimisation of vehicle thin-walled tubes considering sheet metal forming effects. International Journal of Vehicle Design, 73(1–3), 179–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Karen, I., Yildiz, A. R., Kaya, N., Öztürk, N., & Öztürk, F. (2006). Hybrid approach for genetic algorithm and Taguchi’s method based design optimization in the automotive industry. International journal of production research, 44(22), 4897–4914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kiani, M., & Yildiz, A. R. (2016). A comparative study of non-traditional methods for vehicle crashworthiness and NVH optimization. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 23(4), 723–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Leung, T. W., Yung, C. H., & Troutt, M. D. (2001). Applications of genetic search and simulated annealing to the two-dimensional non-guillotine cutting stock problem. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 40(3), 201–214.Google Scholar
  13. Nye, T. J. (2000). Stamping strip layout for optimal raw material utilization. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 19(4), 239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Onwubolu, G. C., & Mutingi, M. (2003). A genetic algorithm approach for the cutting stock problem. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 14(2), 209–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Weeks, T. R., Lopez, R. R., Burgardt, J. J., & Hoffman, D. J. (1993). U.S. Patent No. 5,227,606. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.Google Scholar
  16. Yildiz, A. R. (2013). Comparison of evolutionary-based optimization algorithms for structural design optimization. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 26(1), 327–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Yıldız, A. R., Kurtuluş, E., Demirci, E., Yıldız, B. S., & Karagöz, S. (2016a). Optimization of thin-wall structures using hybrid gravitational search and Nelder–Mead algorithm. Materials Testing, 58(1), 75–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Yıldız, B. S., & Lekesiz, H. (2017). Fatigue-based structural optimisation of vehicle components. International Journal of Vehicle Design, 73(1–3), 54–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Yildiz, B. S., Lekesiz, H., & Yildiz, A. R. (2016b). Structural design of vehicle components using gravitational search and charged system search algorithms. Materials Testing, 58(1), 79–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Yildiz, A. R., & Saitou, K. (2011). Topology synthesis of multicomponent structural assemblies in continuum domains. Journal of Mechanical Design, 133(1), 011008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringKumaraguru College of TechnologyCoimbatoreIndia
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical EngineeringPSG College of TechnologyCoimbatoreIndia

Personalised recommendations