The emergence process of an international network of SMEs and the evolution of the leader’s role

  • Virginie Gallego-RoquelaureEmail author


This research focuses on the evolution of the leader’s role in the emergence of an international network of SMEs. A longitudinal study was conducted among SMEs wishing to develop an international network in Tunisia. A number of SME managers among with some collaborators and partners involved in the project were interviewed. The study reveals the evolution of a leader’s entrepreneurial competencies as this network evolves along several stages. Three key stages have been highlighted: identifying an opportunity for an international network driven by a visionary leader whose main characteristic is curiosity; assessing the opportunity, based on a consolidating leader whose main characteristic is leadership; and exploiting the opportunity, requiring a federating leader whose main characteristic is empathy. A process makes it possible to identify the evolution of competencies, highlighting 3 key characteristics: curiosity, leadership and empathy mobilized throughout the emergence of this network.


International network Leadership Resource-based view SMEs 


Cette recherche porte sur l’évolution du rôle du dirigeant dans l’émergence d’un réseau international de PME. Une étude longitudinale a été menée auprès de PME souhaitant développer un réseau international en Tunisie. Un certain nombre de dirigeants de PME, parmi lesquels des collaborateurs et des partenaires impliqués dans le projet, ont été interrogés. L’étude du cas révèle l’évolution des compétences entrepreneuriales d’un dirigeant au fil de plusieurs étapes : identifier l’opportunité d’un réseau international fondée sur un dirigeant visionnaire dont la caractéristique principale est la curiosité, évaluer cette opportunité, basée sur un dirigeant consolidateur dont la caractéristique principale est le leadership, et exploiter cette opportunité, nécessitant un dirigeant fédérateur dont la caractéristique principale est l’empathie. Le processus permet d’identifier l’évolution des compétences en mettant en évidence 3 caractéristiques clés: la curiosité, le leadership et l’empathie mobilisés tout au long de l’émergence de ce réseau.

Mots clés

Réseau international Leadership Resource-Based-View PME 



  1. Barney JB, Clark DN (2007) Resource-based theory: creating and sustaining competitive advantage. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Belàs J, Ključnikov A (2016) The most important attributes of entrepreneurs. Case study of the environment of Czech SMEs. Int J Entrep Knowl 4(1):104–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bruyat C, Julien PA (2001) Defining the field of research in entrepreneurship. J Bus Ventur 16(2):165–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Buckley PJ, Prashantham S (2016) Global interfirm networks: the division of entrepreneurial labor between MNEs and SMEs. Acad Manag Perspect 30(1):40–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Byun H, Raffiee J, Ganco M (2018) Discontinuities in the value of relational capital: the effects on employee entrepreneurship and mobility. Organ SciGoogle Scholar
  6. Charoensukmongkol P (2016) The interconnections between bribery, political network, government supports, and their consequences on export performance of small and medium enterprises in Thailand. J Int Entrep 14(2):259–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chhotray S, Sivertsson O, Tell J (2017) The roles of leadership, vision, and empowerment in born global companies. J Int Entrep:1–20Google Scholar
  8. Coviello NE (2006) The network dynamics of international new ventures. J Int Bus Stud 37(5):713–731CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Coviello NE, Munro H (1997) Network relationships and the internationalization process of small software firms. Int Bus Rev 6(4):361–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Donckels R, Lambrecht J (1997) The network position of small businesses: an explanatory model. J Small Bus Manag 35(2):13Google Scholar
  11. Druilhe C, Garnsey E (2004) Do academic spin-outs differ and does it matter? J Technol Transf 29(3–4):269–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dyer JH, Singh H (1998) The relational view: cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Acad Manag Rev 23(4):660–679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dyer JH, Singh H, Hesterly WS (2018) The relational view revisited: a dynamic perspective on value creation and value capture. Strateg Manag J 39(12):3140–3162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fernández E, Montes JM, Vázquez CJ (2000) Typology and strategic analysis of intangible resources: a resource-based approach. Technovation 20(2):81–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Freeman S, Edwards R, Schroder B (2006) How smaller born-global firms use networks and alliances to overcome constraints to rapid internationalization. J Int Mark 14(3):33–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gartner WB (1988) “Who is an entrepreneur?” is the wrong question. Am J Small Bus 12(4):11–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gehman J, Glaser VL, Eisenhardt KM, Gioia D, Langley A, Corley KG (2017) Finding theory–method fit: a comparison of three qualitative approaches to theory building. J Manag InqGoogle Scholar
  18. Gioia DA, Corley KG, Hamilton AL (2013) Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: notes on the Gioia methodology. Organ Res Methods 16(1):15–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Iacobucci D, Rosa P (2010) The growth of business groups by habitual entrepreneurs: the role of entrepreneurial teams. Entrep Theory Pract 34(2):351–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ibarra H (1993) Personal networks of women and minorities in management: a conceptual framework. Acad Manag Rev 18(1):56–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Idris B, Saridakis G (2018) Local formal interpersonal network and SMEs internationalization: empirical evidence from the UK. Int Bus Rev 27(3):610–624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jack SL (2010) Approaches to studying networks: implications and outcomes. J Bus Ventur 25(1):120–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Johanson J, Vahlne JE (2009) The Uppsala internationalization process model revisited: from liability of foreignness to liability of outsidership. J Int Bus Stud 40(9):1411–1431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kalantaridis C, Vassilev I (2011) Firm size and the nature of international relationships: the case of globally integrated small firms. J Small Bus Manag 49(4):639–658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kirkels Y, Duysters G (2010) Brokerage in SME networks. Res Policy 39(3):375–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kontinen T, Ojala A (2011) Network ties in the international opportunity recognition of family SMEs. Int Bus Rev 20(4):440–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Langley A, Abdallah C (2011) Templates and turns in qualitative studies of strategy and management. In: Building methodological bridges. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp 201–235Google Scholar
  28. Lara FJ, Salas-Vallina A (2017) Managerial competencies, innovation and engagement in SMEs: the mediating role of organisational learning. J Bus Res 79:152–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lindstrand A, Melén S, Nordman ER (2011) Turning social capital into business: a study of the internationalization of biotech SMEs. Int Bus Rev 20(2):194–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Loué C, Baronet J (2012) Toward a new entrepreneurial skills and competencies framework: a qualitative and quantitative study. Int J Entrep Small Bus 17(4):455–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Loufrani-Fedida S, Hauch V, Elidrissi D (2019) The dynamics of relational competencies in the development of born global firms: a multilevel approach. Int Bus Rev 28(2):222–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Manolova TS, Manev IM, Gyoshev BS (2010) In good company: the role of personal and inter-firm networks for new-venture internationalization in a transition economy. J World Bus 45(3):257–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Marchesnay M, Julien PA (1990) The small business: as a transaction space. Entrep Reg Dev 2(3):267–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Meiseberg B, Ehrmann T (2013) Tendency to network of small and medium-sized enterprises: combining organizational economics and resource-based perspectives. Manag Decis Econ 34(3–5):283–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Musteen M, Francis J, Datta DK (2010) The influence of international networks on internationalization speed and performance: a study of Czech SMEs. J World Bus 45(3):197–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nowiński W, Rialp A (2016) The impact of social networks on perceptions of international opportunities. J Small Bus Manag 54(2):445–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Oparaocha GO (2015) SMEs and international entrepreneurship: an institutional network perspective. Int Bus Rev 24(5):861–873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Penrose ET (1959) The theory of the growth of the firm. Oxford University Press, LondresGoogle Scholar
  39. Prajapati K, Biswas SN (2011) Effect of entrepreneur network and entrepreneur self-efficacy on subjective performance: a study of handicraft and handloom cluster. J Entrep 20(2):227–247Google Scholar
  40. Rasmussen E, Mosey S, Wright M (2011) The evolution of entrepreneurial competencies: a longitudinal study of university spin-off venture emergence. J Manag Stud 48(6):1314–1345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rialp A, Rialp J (2007) Faster and more successful exporters: an exploratory study of born global firms from the resource-based view. J Euromark 16(1-2):71–86 Industrial marketing management, 28(5), 467–479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ritter T (1999) The networking company: antecedents for coping with relationships and networks effectivelyGoogle Scholar
  43. Ritter T, Gemünden HG (2004) The impact of a company’s business strategy on its technological competence, network competence and innovation success. J Bus Res 57(5):548–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Santamaria-Alvarez SM, Muñoz-Castro DC, Sarmiento-González MA, Marín-Zapata SI (2018) Fragmented networks and transnational entrepreneurship: building strategies to prosper in challenging surroundings. J Int Entrep 16(2):244–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Saridakis G, Idris B, Hansen JM, Dana LP (2019) SMEs’ internationalisation: when does innovation matter? J Bus Res 96:250–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Schotter A, Beamish PW (2013) The hassle factor: an explanation for managerial location shunning. J Int Bus Stud 44(5):521–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Shane S (2003) A general theory of entrepreneurship. The individual-opportunity nexus. Edward Elgar, NorthamptonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Stoian MC, Rialp J, Dimitratos P (2017) SME networks and international performance: unveiling the significance of foreign market entry mode. J Small Bus Manag 55(1):128–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Unger JM, Rauch A, Frese M, Rosenbusch N (2011) Human capital and entrepreneurial success: a meta-analytical review. J Bus Ventur 26(3):341–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Vahlne, JE, Johanson J (2017) From internationalization to evolution: the Uppsala model at 40 years. J Int Bus Stud 48.9 (2017): 1087–1102Google Scholar
  51. Vanghely IP, Julien PA (2010) Are opportunities recognized or constructed?: An information perspective on entrepreneurial opportunity identification. J Bus Ventur 25(1):73–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Zhang X, Ma X, Wang Y, Li X, Huo D (2016) What drives the internationalization of Chinese SMEs? The joint effects of international entrepreneurship characteristics, network ties, and firm ownership. Int Bus Rev 25(2):522–534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Zucchella A, Scabini P (2007) International entrepreneurship: theoretical foundations and practices. Palgrave Macmillan, New York 207 pCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.iaelyon School of Management, Magellan Research CenterUniversity of LyonLyonFrance

Personalised recommendations