Advertisement

Journal of International Entrepreneurship

, Volume 16, Issue 2, pp 276–300 | Cite as

Shaping the castle according to the rocks in the path? Perceived discrimination, social differences, and subjective wellbeing as determinants of firm type among immigrant entrepreneurs

  • Carlos Poblete
Article
  • 92 Downloads

Abstract

This paper argues that transnational entrepreneurs are characterized in terms of their differing perceptions of the host society in comparison to conventional immigrant entrepreneurs. We focus on three aspects of individuals’ perception of informal institutions which include (1) individuals’ perception of discrimination based on first-person and third-person experience, (2) individuals’ perception of social differences, and (3) subjective wellbeing. We find that among other immigrant entrepreneurs, transnational entrepreneurs are more likely to perceive social differences within the host society, to have been discriminated against, and experience dissatisfaction regarding opportunities and income.

Keywords

Transnational entrepreneurship Discrimination Social differences Subjective wellbeing 

References

  1. Acedo FJ, Florin J (2006) An entrepreneurial cognition perspective on the internationalization of SMEs. J Int Entrep 4(1):49–67.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10843-006-0482-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aldén L, Hammarstedt M (2016) Discrimination in the credit market? Access to financial capital among self-employed immigrants. Kyklos 69(1):3–31.  https://doi.org/10.1111/kykl.12101 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andersson P (2008) Happiness and health: well-being among the self-employed. J Socio-Econ 37(1):213–236.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2007.03.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arenius P, Minniti M (2005) Perceptual variables and nascent entrepreneurship. Small Bus Econ 24(3):233–247.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-005-1984-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arrow K (1973) The theory of discrimination. Discrimination Labor Markets 3(10):3–33Google Scholar
  6. Aycan Z, Berry JW (1996) Impact of employment-related experiences on immigrants' psychological well-being and adaptation to Canada. Can J Behav Sci 28(3):240–251.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0008-400X.28.3.240 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bagwell S (2015) Transnational entrepreneurship amongst Vietnamese businesses in London. J Ethn Migr Stud 41(2):329–349.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2014.907739 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Baron RA, Franklin RJ, Hmieleski KM (2016) Why entrepreneurs often experience low, not high, levels of stress: the joint effects of selection and psychological capital. J Manag 42(3):742–768.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206313495411 Google Scholar
  9. Basu A, Altinay E (2002) The interaction between culture and entrepreneurship in London's immigrant businesses. Int Small Bus J 20(4):371–393.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242602204001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Baumol WJ (1990) Entrepreneurship: productive, unproductive, and destructive. J Polit Econ 98(5):893–921.  https://doi.org/10.1086/261712 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Becker G (1957) The economics of discrimination. The University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  12. Becker GS (1993) Nobel lecture: the economic way of looking at behavior. J Polit Econ 101(3):385–409.  https://doi.org/10.1086/261880 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Beiser M (1988) Influences of time, ethnicity, and attachment. Am J Psychiatry 1:46–51Google Scholar
  14. Birman D, Trickett EJ (2001) Cultural transitions in first-generation immigrants acculturation of Soviet Jewish refugee adolescents and parents. J Cross-Cult Psychol 32(4):456–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Birman D, Trickett EJ, Vinokurov A (2002) Acculturation and adaptation of Soviet Jewish refugee adolescents: predictors of adjustment across life domains. Am J Community Psychol 30(5):585–607.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016323213871 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bommes M, Geddes A (2000) Immigration and welfare: challenging the borders of the welfare state. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  17. Bourdieu P (1990) The logic of practice. Stanford University Press, StanfordGoogle Scholar
  18. Bradburn, N. M. (1969). The structure of psychological well-beingGoogle Scholar
  19. Bruton GD, Ahlstrom D, Li HL (2010) Institutional theory and entrepreneurship: where are we now and where do we need to move in the future? Entrep Theory Pract 34(3):421–440.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00390.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Busenitz LW, Lau CM (1996) A cross-cultural cognitive model of new venture creation. Enterp Theory Pract 20(4):25–40.  https://doi.org/10.1177/104225879602000403 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Busenitz LW, Gomez C, Spencer JW (2000) Country institutional profiles: unlocking entrepreneurial phenomena. Acad Manag J 43(5):994–1003.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1556423 Google Scholar
  22. Campbell A (1981) The sense of well-being in America: recent patterns and trends. McGraw-Hill Companies, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Campbell A, Converse PE, Rodgers WL (1976) The quality of American life: perceptions, evaluations, and satisfactions. Russell Sage Foundation, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. Casey SR, Hamilton RT (2014) Export performance of small firms from small countries: the case of New Zealand. J Int Entrep 12(3):254–269.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10843-014-0126-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Chen W, Tan J (2008) Roots and wings: glocalized networks and transnational entrepreneurship. In: Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings. Academy of Management, AnaheimGoogle Scholar
  26. Chen W, Tan J (2009) Understanding transnational entrepreneurship through a network lens: theoretical and methodological considerations. Enterp Theory Pract 33(5):1079–1091.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00335.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Coyne CJ, Isaacs JP, Schwartz JT (2010) Entrepreneurship and the taste for discrimination. J Evol Econ 20(4):609–627.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-009-0164-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Denicolai S, Hagen B, Pisoni A (2015) Be international or be innovative? Be both? The role of the entrepreneurial profile. J Int Entrep 13(4):390–417.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10843-015-0143-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Denzau AT, North DC (1994) Shared mental models: ideologies and institutions. Kyklos 47(1):3–31.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6435.1994.tb02246.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Dequech D (2003) Cognitive and cultural embeddedness: combining institutional economics and economic sociology. J Econ Issues 37(2):461–470.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2003.11506594 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Diener E (2000) Subjective : the science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. Am Psychol 55(1):34–43.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.34 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Drori, I., Honig, B., & Ginsberg, A. (2006). Transnational Entrepreneurship: Toward a unifying theoretical framework. In Academy of Management 2006 Annual Meeting: Knowledge, Action and the Public Concern, AOM 2006, AtlantaGoogle Scholar
  33. Drori I, Honig B, Wright M (2009) Transnational entrepreneurship: an emergent field of study. Enterp Theory Pract 33(5):1001–1022.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00332.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Dupuy HJ (1978) Self-representations of general psychological well-being of American adults, vol 17. American Public Health Association Meeting, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
  35. Evans-Campbell T, Lincoln KD, Takeuchi DT (2007) Race and mental health: past debates, new opportunities. In Mental health, social mirror (pp. 169–189). Springer USGoogle Scholar
  36. Foss NJ, Klein PG, Kor YY, Mahoney JT (2008) Entrepreneurship, subjectivism, and the resource-based view: toward a new synthesis. Strateg Entrep J 2(1):73–94.  https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.41 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Franzini L, Fernandez-Esquer ME (2006) The association of subjective social status and health in low-income Mexican-origin individuals in Texas. Soc Sci Med 63(3):788–804.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.01.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Gnyawali DR, Fogel DS (1994) Environments for entrepreneurship development: key dimensions and research implications. Enterp Theory Pract 18(4):43–62.  https://doi.org/10.1177/104225879401800403 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Greene WH (2003) Econometric analysis. 5th ed. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
  40. Groenland E (1990) Structural elements of material well-being: an empirical test among people on social security. Soc Indic Res 22(4):367–384.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00303832 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Guarnizo LE, Portes A, Haller W (2003) Assimilation and transnationalism: determinants of transnational political action among contemporary migrants. Am J Sociol 108(6):1211–1248.  https://doi.org/10.1086/375195 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Guercini S, Milanesi M, Dei Ottati G (2017) Paths of evolution for the Chinese migrant entrepreneurship: a multiple case analysis in Italy. J Int Entrep 15(3):266–294.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10843-017-0209-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hammarstedt M (2001) Immigrant self-employment in Sweden—its variation and some possible determinants. Entrep Reg Dev 13(2):147–161.  https://doi.org/10.1080/08985620010004106 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hammarstedt M (2004) Self-employment among immigrants in Sweden—an analysis of intragroup differences. Small Bus Econ 23(2):115–126.  https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SBEJ.0000027664.58874.62 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Jasinskaja-Lahti I, Liebkind K, Jaakkola M, Reuter A (2006) Perceived discrimination, social support networks, and psychological well-being among three immigrant groups. J Cross-Cult Psychol 37(3):293–311.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022106286925 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Jensen SM, Luthans F (2006) Relationship between entrepreneurs’ psychological capital and their authentic leadership. J Manag Issues 18(2):254–273Google Scholar
  47. Jones T, McEvoy D, Barratt G (1992) Ethnic identity and entrepreneurial predisposition: business entry, motives of Asians, Afro-Caribbeans and Whites. URSC Small Business Initiative, University of Warwick, WarwickGoogle Scholar
  48. Kariv D, Menzies TV, Brenner GA, Filion LJ (2009) Transnational networking and business performance: ethnic entrepreneurs in Canada. Entrep Reg Dev 21(3):239–264.  https://doi.org/10.1080/08985620802261641 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Knight GA (1997) Cross-cultural reliability and validity of a scale to measure firm entrepreneurial orientation. J Bus Ventur 12(3):213–225.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(96)00065-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kor YY, Mahoney JT, Michael SC (2007) Resources, capabilities and entrepreneurial perceptions. J Manag Stud 44(7):1187–1212.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00727.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kostova T (1997) Country institutional profiles: concept and measurement. Acad Manag Proc 97(1):180–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Krueger NF, Brazeal DV (1994) Entrepreneurial potential and potential entrepreneurs. Enterp Theory Pract 18(3):91–104.  https://doi.org/10.1177/104225879401800307 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Kyle D (1999) The Otavalo trade diaspora: social capital and transnational entrepreneurship. Ethn Racial Stud 22(2):422–446.  https://doi.org/10.1080/014198799329549 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Landolt P (2000) The causes and consequences of transnational migration: Salvadorans in Los Angeles and Washington, DC. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MDGoogle Scholar
  55. Levitt P, Jaworsky BN (2007) Transnational migration studies: past developments and future trends. Annu Rev Sociol 33(1):129–156.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.33.040406.131816 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Light I, Gold SJ (2000) Ethnic conomies. Academic Press, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  57. Light IH, Rosenstein CN (1995) Race, ethnicity, and entrepreneurship in urban America. Transaction Publishers, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  58. Lin X, Tao S (2012) Transnational entrepreneurs: characteristics, drivers, and success factors. J Int Entrep 10(1):50–69.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10843-011-0082-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Lipson JG, Miller S (1994) Changing roles of Afghan refugee women in the United States. Health Care Women Int 15(3):171–180.  https://doi.org/10.1080/07399339409516110 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Lu L (1995) The relationship between subjective well-being and psychosocial variables in Taiwan. J Soc Psychol 135(3):351–357.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1995.9713964 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Massey DS, Arango J, Hugo G, Kouaouci A, Pellegrino A (1999) Worlds in motion: understanding international migration at the end of the millennium. JE Taylor Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  62. McDougall PP, Oviatt BM, Shrader RC (2003) A comparison of international and domestic new ventures. J Int Entrep 1(1):59–82.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023246622972 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Meyer JW, Rowan B (1977) Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. Am J Sociol 83(2):340–363.  https://doi.org/10.1086/226550 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Min PG (1988) Ethnic business enterprise: Korean small business in Atlanta. Center for Migration Studies, New York, pp 117–123Google Scholar
  65. Morawska E (2004) Immigrant transnational entrepreneurs in New York: three varieties and their correlates. Int J Entrep Behav Res 10(5):325–348.  https://doi.org/10.1108/13552550410554311 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Nardinelli C, Simon C (1990) Customer racial discrimination in the market for memorabilia: the case of baseball. Q J Econ 105(3):575–595.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2937891 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Naudé W, Amorós JE, Cristi O (2014) “Surfeiting, the appetite may sicken”: entrepreneurship and happiness. Small Bus Econ 42(3):523–540.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-013-9492-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Nelson RR (ed) (1993) National innovation systems: a comparative analysis. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  69. Nelson R, Sampat B (2001) Making sense of institutions as a factor shaping economic performance. J Econ Behav Organ 44(1):31–54.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2681(00)00152-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. North DC (1990) Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.  https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808678
  71. North DC (2005) Institutions and the process of economic change. Manag Int 9(3):1Google Scholar
  72. Parasuraman S, Purohit YS, Godshalk VM, Beutell NJ (1996) Work and family variables, entrepreneurial career success, and psychological. J Vocat Behav 48(3):275–300.  https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1996.0025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Patel PC, Conklin B (2009) The balancing act: the role of transnational habitus and social networks in balancing transnational entrepreneurial activities. Enterp Theory Pract 33(5):1045–1078.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00334.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Penrose ET (1959) The theory of the growth of the firm. John Wiley, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  75. Peterson SJ, Luthans F, Avolio BJ, Walumbwa FO, Zhang Z (2011) Psychological capital and employee performance: a latent growth modeling approach. Pers Psychol 64(2):427–450.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2011.01215.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Phelps ES (1972) The statistical theory of racism and sexism. Am Econ Rev 62(4):659–661Google Scholar
  77. Pinho JC (2016) Institutional theory and global entrepreneurship: exploring differences between factor-versus innovation-driven countries. J Int Entrep 15(1):1–29Google Scholar
  78. Portes A (2003) Conclusion: theoretical convergencies and empirical evidence in the study of immigrant transnationalism. Int Migr Rev 37(3):874–892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Portes A, Rumbaut RG (1996) Immigrant America. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  80. Portes A, Guarnizo LE, Haller WJ (2002) Transnational entrepreneurs: an alternative form of immigrant economic adaptation. Am Sociol Rev 67(2):278–298.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3088896 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Ram, M. (1994). Managing to survive: working lives in small firms. Blackwell Business Google Scholar
  82. Ram M, Jones T, Villares-Varela M (2017) Migrant entrepreneurship: reflections on research and practice. Int Small Bus J 35(1):3–18.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242616678051 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Richmond AH (1974) Aspects of the absorption and adaptation of immigrants. Manpower and Immigration, OttawaGoogle Scholar
  84. Riddle L, Brinkerhoff J (2011) Diaspora entrepreneurs as institutional change agents: the case of Thamel.com. Int Bus Rev 20(6):670–680.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2011.02.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Riddle L, Hrivnak GA, Nielsen TM (2010) Transnational diaspora entrepreneurship in emerging markets: bridging institutional divides. J Int Manag 16(4):398–411.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2010.09.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Rondinelli DA, Kasarda JD (1992) Foreign trade potential, small enterprise development and job creation in developing countries. Small Bus Econ 4(4):253–265.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00388621 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Rumbaut RG (1991) The agony of exile: a study of the migration and adaptation of Indochinese refugee adults and children. In:Ahearn FL Jr, J Athey (Eds) Refugee Children: Theory, Research, and Practice. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University PressGoogle Scholar
  88. Saxenian A (2005) From brain drain to brain circulation: transnational communities and regional upgrading in India and China. Stud Comp Int Dev 40(2):35–61.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02686293 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Saxenian A, Motoyama Y, Quan X (2002) Local and global networks of immigrant professionals in Silicon Valley. Public Policy Instit of CA, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  90. Scott W (1991) Unpacking institutional arguments. In: Powell W, DiMaggio P (eds) The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 164–182Google Scholar
  91. Scott R (1995) Institutions and organizations. Sage Publications, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  92. Sequeira JM, Carr JC, Rasheed AA (2009) Transnational entrepreneurship: determinants of firm type and owner attributions of success. Enterp Theory Pract 33(5):1023–1044.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00333.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Shane S, Venkataraman S (2000) The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Acad Manag Rev 25(1):217–226Google Scholar
  94. Teixeira AA, Coimbra C (2014) The determinants of the internationalization speed of Portuguese university spin-offs: an empirical investigation. J Int Entrep 12(3):270–308.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10843-014-0132-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Terjesen S, Elam A (2009) Transnational entrepreneurs’ venture internationalization strategies: a practice theory approach. Enterp Theory Pract 33(5):1093–1120.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00336.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Tiessen JH (1997) Individualism, collectivism, and entrepreneurship: a framework for international comparative research. J Bus Ventur 12(5):367–384.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(97)81199-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. U.S. Bureau of the Census (1999) Profile of the foreign-born population of the United States: 1997. Current Population Reports, Special Studies #P23–195. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of CommerceGoogle Scholar
  98. Urbano D, Toledano N, Ribeiro-Soriano D (2011) Socio-cultural factors and transnational entrepreneurship: a multiple case study in Spain. Int Small Bus J 29(2):119–134.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242610391934 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Veenhoven R (1991) Is happiness relative? Soc Indic Res 24(1):1–34.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00292648 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Vertovec S (2003) Migration and other modes of transnationalism: towards conceptual cross-fertilization. Int Migr Rev 37(3):641–665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Vinogradov E, Jørgensen E (2016) Differences in international opportunity identification between native and immigrant entrepreneurs. J Int Entrep 15(2):1–22Google Scholar
  102. Waldinger R, Fitzgerald D (2004) Transnationalism in Question1. Am J Sociol 109(5):1177–1195.  https://doi.org/10.1086/381916 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Waldinger R, Aldrich H, Ward R (1999) Opportunities, group characteristics, and strategies. In: Waldinger R, Aldrich H, Ward R (eds) Ethnic entrepreneurs: immigrant business in industrial societies. Sage, Newbury ParkGoogle Scholar
  104. Wang Q, Liu CY (2015) Transnational activities of immigrant-owned firms and their performances in the USA. Small Bus Econ 44(2):345–359.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-014-9595-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Warin T, Svaton P (2008) European migration: welfare migration or economic migration? Glob Econ J 8(3):1–30Google Scholar
  106. Welter F (2011) Contextualizing entrepreneurship—conceptual challenges and ways forward. Enterp Theory Pract 35(1):165–184.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00427.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Wicks D (2001) Institutionalized mindsets of invulnerability: differentiated institutional fields and the antecedents of organizational crisis. Organ Stud 22(4):659–692.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840601224005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Williams DR, Collins C (1995) US socioeconomic and racial differences in health: patterns and explanations. Annu Rev Sociol 21(1):349–386.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.21.080195.002025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Wooldridge JM (2015) Introductory econometrics: a modern approach. South-Western Cengage Learning, MasonGoogle Scholar
  110. Yeung HWC (2002) Entrepreneurship in international business: an institutional perspective. Asia Pac J Manag 19(1):29–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Young S, Dimitratos P, Dana LP (2003) International entrepreneurship research: what scope for international business theories? J Int Entrep 1(1):31–42.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023286232541 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Zahra SA, Korri JS, Yu J (2005) Cognition and international entrepreneurship: implications for research on international opportunity recognition and exploitation. Int Bus Rev 14(2):129–146.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2004.04.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Universidad del DesarrolloSantiagoChile

Personalised recommendations