Advertisement

Journal of International Entrepreneurship

, Volume 16, Issue 2, pp 210–243 | Cite as

Ethnic ties, motivations, and home country entry strategy of transnational entrepreneurs

  • Sarika Pruthi
  • Anuradha Basu
  • Mike Wright
Article
  • 306 Downloads

Abstract

Based on 30 in-depth interviews with Indian transnational entrepreneurs (TEs) in the USA and their corresponding India heads of operations, we explore the influence of TEs’ ethnic ties on their motivations and entry strategy in the formation of transnational ventures in their home country. Our findings show the heterogeneity of TEs’ motivations (economic and emotional) and home country entry strategy (proactive and reactive). Further, we find that TEs’ entry strategy is contingent on their (a) use of professional and personal ethnic ties and (b) prior experience of doing business with the home country. These findings contribute to the transnational and immigrant entrepreneurship literatures.

Keywords

Transnational entrepreneurs USA Motivations Ethnic ties Entry mode strategy Technology 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was furthered through the support from the 2016 Research Scholarship and Creative Activity (RSCA) Award at San Jose State University (SJSU). Financial assistance from the Silicon Valley Center for Entrepreneurship (SVCE) at SJSU and Imperial College London Business School at Imperial College London, UK, is gratefully acknowledged. Earlier versions of this paper were presented at the 2017 Academy of International Business (AIB) West Chapter, and annual Academy of Management (AOM) conferences in San Jose (California) and Atlanta (Georgia), USA. The authors thank Shivani Jatia, Shreeram Gopalakrishnan, and Neha Katti for their research assistance and three anonymous JIE reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions.

References

  1. Agarwal A, Kapur D, McHale J (2008) How do spatial and geographic proximity influence knowledge flows? Evidence from patent data. J Urban Econ 64(2):258–269.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2008.01.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aldrich HE, Waldinger R (1990) Ethnicity and entrepreneurship. Annu Rev Sociol 16(1):111–135.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.16.080190.000551 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson A, Park J, Jack S (2007) Entrepreneurial social capital: conceptualizing social capital in new high-tech firms. Int Small Bus J 25(3):245–272.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242607076526 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Audretsch D, Aldridge T (2012) Transnational social capital and scientist entrepreneurship. J Manag Gov 16:369–376Google Scholar
  5. Autio E, Sapienza H. J, Almeida JG (2000) Effects of age at entry, knowledge intensity, and imitability on international growth. Acad Manag J 43(5):909–924Google Scholar
  6. Bagwell S (2007) Transnational family networks and ethnic minority business development. Int J Entrep Behav Res 14(6):377–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Basu A (1998) An exploration of entrepreneurial activity among Asian small businesses in Britain. Small Bus Econ 10(4):313–326.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007956009913 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Basu A, Altinay E (2002) The interaction between culture and entrepreneurship in London’s immigrant businesses. Int Small Bus J 20(4):371–393.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242602204001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Beine M, Docquier F, Ozden C (2011) Diasporas. J Dev Econ 95(1):30–41.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2009.11.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bonacich E (1973) A theory of middleman minorities. Am Sociol Rev 38(5):583.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2094409 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brinkerhoff JM (2009) Digital diasporas: identity and transnational engagement, 1st edn. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  12. Brzozowski J, Cucculelli M, Surdej A (2014) Transantional ties and performance of immigrant entrepreneurs: the role of home country conditions. Entrep Reg Dev 26(7–8):546–573.  https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2014.959068 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chaganti R, Green P (2002) Who are ethnic entrepreneurs? A study of entrepreneurs’ ethnic involvement and business characteristics. J Small Bus Manag 40(2):126–140.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-627X.00045 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chen W, Tan J (2009) Understanding transnational entrepreneurship through a network lens: theoretical and methodological considerations. Entrep: Theory Prac 33(5):1079–1091Google Scholar
  15. Chung H, Tung R (2013) Immigrant social networks and foreign entry: Australia and New Zealand firms in the European Union and Greater China. Int Bus Rev 22(1):18–31.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2012.01.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Coviello N, Jones M (2004) Methodological issues in international entrepreneurship research. J Bus Ventur 19(4):485–508.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2003.06.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Coviello N, Munro H (1995) Growing the entrepreneurial firm. Eur J Mark 29(7):49–61.  https://doi.org/10.1108/03090569510095008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Crick D, Chaudhry S (2013) An exploratory study of UK based, family-owned, Asian firms’ motives for internationalising. J Small Bus Enterp Dev 20(3):526–538.  https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-04-2013-0051 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Crick D, Spence M (2005) The Internationalisation of ‘high performing’ UK high-tech SMEs: a study of planned and unplanned strategies. Int Bus Rev 14(2):167–185Google Scholar
  20. Deakins D, Ishaq M, Smallbone D, Whittam G, Wyper J (2007) Ethnic minority businesses in Scotland and the role of social capital. Int Small Bus J 25(3):307–326.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242607076530 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dimitratos P, Johnson J, Slow J, Young S (2003) Micro multinationals: new types of firms for the global competitive landscape. Eur Manag J 21(2):164–174.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-2373(03)00011-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dossani R, Kenney M (2002) Creating an environment for venture capital in India. World Dev 30(2):227–253.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(01)00110-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Drori I, Honig B, Wright M (2009) Transnational entrepreneurship and global reach. Spec Issue Entrep Theory Prac 33:1001–1022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dutia SG (2012) Diaspora Networks: A new impetus to drive entrepreneurship. Innovations, 7, Winter 2012, 65–72.  https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2373984
  25. Eisenhardt KM (1989) Building theories from case study research. Acad Manag Rev 14:488–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Eisenhardt KM, Graebner ME (2007) Theory building from cases: opportunities and challenges. Acad Manag J 50(1):25–32.  https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2007.24160888 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ellis P (2000) Social ties and foreign market entry. J Int Bus Stud 31(3):443–469.  https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490916 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Elo M (2014) Diaspora networks in international business and transnational entrepreneurship—a literature review. Zentra Working Papers in Transantional Studies No. #/2014. Zentra Center for Transnational StudiesGoogle Scholar
  29. Etemad H, Wright RW, Dana LP (2001) Symbiotic international business networks: collaboration between small and large firms. Thunderbird Int Bus Rev 43(4):481–499.  https://doi.org/10.1002/tie.1009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Filatotchev I, Strange R, Piesse J, Lien Y (2007) FDI by firms from newly industrialised economies in emerging markets: corporate governance, entry mode and location. J Int Bus Stud 38(4):556–572.  https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400279 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Garud R, Rappa MA (1994) A socio-cognitive model of technological evolution: the case of cochlear implants. Organ Sci 5(3):344–362.  https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.5.3.344 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gillespie K, Riddle L, Sayre E, Sturges D (1999) Diaspora homeland investment interest. J Int Bus Stud 30(3):623–634.  https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490087 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Granovetter MS (1973) The strength of weak ties. Am J Sociol 78(6):1360–1380.  https://doi.org/10.1086/225469 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Granovetter MS (1983) The strength of weak ties: a network theory revisited. Sociol Theory 1(1):201–233.  https://doi.org/10.2307/202051 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Granovetter MS (1985) Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness. Am J Sociol 91(3):481–510.  https://doi.org/10.1086/228311 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hart D, Acs ZJ (2011) High-tech immigrant entrepreneurship in the United States. Econ Dev Q 25(2):116–129.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0891242410394336 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hmieleski KM, Baron RA (2009) Entrepreneurs’ optimism and new venture performance: a social cognitive perspective. Acad Manag J 52(3):473–488Google Scholar
  38. Hofstede G (2001) Cultures consequences: comparing values, behaviours, institutions and organizations across nations, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CAGoogle Scholar
  39. Kariv D, Filion LJ, Menzies TV (2009) Transnational networking and business performance: ethnic entrepreneurs in Canada. Entrep Reg Dev 21(3):239–264.  https://doi.org/10.1080/08985620802261641 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lee L, Wong P, Foo M, Leung A (2011) Entrepreneurial intentions: the influence of organizational and individual factors. J Bus Ventur 26(1):124–136.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.04.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Levitt P, Jaworsky BN (2007) Transnational migration studies: past development and future trends. Annu Rev Sociol 33(1):129–156.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.33.040406.131816 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Light I, Gold SJ (2000) Ethnic economies. Academic Press, San Diego, CAGoogle Scholar
  43. Lipscomb M (2012) Abductive reasoning and qualitative research. Nurs Philos 13(4):244–256.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-769X.2011.00532.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Liu CY, Painter G, Wang Q (2014) Lessons for U.S. metro areas: characteristics and clustering of high-tech immigrant entrepreneurs. Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation, Kansas City, MissouriGoogle Scholar
  45. Madhaven R, Iriyama A (2009) Understanding global flows of venture capital: human networks as the “carrier wave” of globalization. J Int Bus Stud 40(8):1241–1259.  https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2009.6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Majumdar SK (2007) Private enterprise growth and human capital productivity in India. Entrepreneurship. Theory Prac 31(6):853–872CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. McEwan C, Pollard J, Henry N (2005) The ‘Global’ in the city economy: multicultural economic development in Birmingham. Int J Urban Reg Res 29(4):916–933.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2005.00628.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Mustafa M, Chen S (2010) The strength of family networks in transnational immigrant entrepreneurship. Thunderbird Int Bus Rev 52(2):98–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Nanda R, Khanna T (2010) Diasporas and domestic entrepreneurs: evidence from the Indian software industry. J Econ Manag Strateg 19(4):991–1012Google Scholar
  50. Ouchi W (1980) Markets, bureaucracies, and clans. Adm Sci Q 25(1):129–142.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2392231 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Oviatt B, McDougall PP (1994) Toward a theory of international new ventures. J Int Bus Stud 25(1):45–64.  https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490193 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Patel PC, Conklin B (2009) The balancing act: the role of transnational habitus and social networks in balancing transnational entrepreneurial activities. Entrep Theory Prac 2009:1045–1078CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Patel PC, Terjesen S (2011) Complementary effects of network range and tie strength in enhancing transnational venture performance. Strateg Entrep J 5(1):58–80Google Scholar
  54. Phillips T, Tracey P, Karra N (2013) Building entrepreneurial tie portfolios through strategic homophily: the role of narrative identity work in venture creation and early growth. J Bus Ventur 28(1):134–150.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2011.12.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Portes A (1995) Economic sociology and the sociology of immigration: a conceptual overview. In: Portes A (ed) The economic sociology of immigration. Russel Sage Foundation, New York, pp 1–41Google Scholar
  56. Portes A, Jensen L (1989) What’s an ethnic enclave? The case for conceptual clarity. Am Sociol Rev 52:768–770Google Scholar
  57. Portes A, Yiu J (2013) Entrepreneurship, transnationalism, and development. Migr Stud 1(1):75–95Google Scholar
  58. Portes A, Haller W, Guarnizo L (2002) Transnational entrepreneurs: an alternative form of immigrant economic adaptation. Am Sociol Rev 67(2):278–298. Press.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3088896 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Prashantham S, Dhanaraj C, Kumar K (2015) Ties that bind: ethnic ties and new venture internationalization. Long Range Plan 48(5):317–333.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2015.02.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Pruthi S (2014) Social ties and venture creation by returnee entrepreneurs. Int Bus Rev 23(6):1139–1152.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2014.03.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Pruthi S, Wright M (2017) Social ties, social capital and recruiting managers in transnational ventures. J East-West Bus 23(2):105–139.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10669868.2016.1270247 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Ram M (1994) Unravelling social networks in ethnic minority firms. International small development of high-tech start-ups: a social capital approach. Int Bus Rev 16:23–46Google Scholar
  63. Rath J, Kloosterman R (2000) Outsiders’ business: a critical review of research on immigrant entrepreneurship. Int Migr Rev 34(3):657–681.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2675940 Google Scholar
  64. Rauch J, Trindade V (2002) Ethnic Chinese networks in international trade. Rev Econ Stat 84(1):116–130.  https://doi.org/10.1162/003465302317331955 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Rialp A, Rialp J, Knight G (2005) The phenomenon of early internationalizing firms: what do we know after a decade (1993–2003) of scientific inquiry? Int Bus Rev 14(2):147–166.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2004.04.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Riddle L (2008) Diasporas: exploring their development potential. ESR Rev 10(2):28–36Google Scholar
  67. Riddle L, Brinkerhoff J (2011) Diaspora entrepreneurs as institutional change agents: the case of Thamel.com. Int Bus Rev 20(6):670–680.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2011.02.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Riddle L, Hrivnak GA, Nielsen TM (2010) Transnational diaspora entrepreneurship in emerging markets: bridging institutional divides. J Int Manag 16(4):398–411.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2010.09.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Saxenian A, Motoyama Y, Quan X (2002) Local and Global Networks of Immigrant Professionals in Silicon Valley. Public Policy Institute of California, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  70. Saxenian AL (2005) From brain drain to brain circulation: transnational communities and regional upgrading in India and China. Stud Comp Int Dev 40(2):35–61.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02686293 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Segaro EL, Larimo J, Jones MV (2014) Internationalization of family small and medium sized enterprises: the role of stewardship orientation, family commitment culture and top management team. Int Bus Rev 23(2):381–395Google Scholar
  72. Sequeira JM, Carr JC, Rasheed AA (2009) Transnational entrepreneurship: determinants of firm type and owner attributions of success. Enterp Theory Pract 33(5):1023–1044.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00333.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Solimano A (2006) The international mobility of talent and its impact on global development. networks: the case of Taiwan, China and India. Industry and Innovation. Special Issue on Global Production Networks Fall, 2002Google Scholar
  74. Sonderegger P, Täube F (2010) Cluster lifecycle and diaspora effects: evidence from the Indian IT cluster in Bangalore. J Int Manag 16(4):383–397.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2010.09.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Starr JA, Macmillan IC (1990) Resource cooptation via social contracting: resource acquisition strategies for new ventures. Strateg Manag J 11:79–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Suddaby R (2010) From the editors: what grounded theory is not. Acad Manag J 49(4):633–642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Terjesen S, Elam A (2009) Transnational entrepreneurs’ venture internationalization strategies: a practice theory approach. Entrep Theory Prac 2009:1093–1120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Thompson C (1999) Pearls, pith and provocation; qualitative research into nurse decision making: factors for consideration in theoretical sampling. Qual Health Res 9(6):815–828.  https://doi.org/10.1177/104973239900900609 Google Scholar
  79. Tung R, Chung H (2010) Diaspora and trade facilitation: the case of ethnic Chinese in Australia. Asia Pac J Manag 27(3):371–392.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-009-9146-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Vaaler PM (2013) Diaspora concentration and the venture investment impact of remittances. J Int Manag 19(1):26–46.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2012.11.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Van de Ven AH, Poole MS (1990) Methods for studying innovation development in the Minnesota innovation research program. J Organ Sci 1(3):313–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Vertovec S (2003) Migration and other modes of transnationalism: towards conceptual cross-fertilization. Int Migr Rev 37(3):641–665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Waldinger R, Aldrich H, Ward R (1990) Ethnic entrepreneurs. Immigrant business in industrial societies, Sage series on race and ethnic relations, vol 1. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  84. Wong LL, Ng M (2002) The emergence of small transnational enterprise in Vancouver: the case of Chinese entrepreneur immigrants. Int. Journal of Urban and Regional Research 26(3):508–530Google Scholar
  85. Yeung H (2009) Transnationalizing entrepreneurship: a critical agenda for economic geography. Prog Hum Geogr 33(2):210–235.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132508096032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Yin RK (1994) Case study research: design and methods, 2nd edn. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  87. Zaheer S, Lamin A, Subramani M (2009) Cluster capabilities or ethnic ties? Location choice by foreign and domestic entrants in the services offshoring industry in India. J Int Bus Stud 40(6):944–968.  https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2008.91 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Zahra S (2005) A theory of international new ventures: a decade of research. J Int Bus Stud 36(1):20–28.  https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400118 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Zain M, Ng SI (2006) The impacts of network relationships on SMEs’ internationalization process. Thunderbird Int Bus Rev 48(2):183–205.  https://doi.org/10.1002/tie.20092 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Zhao H, Hsu C (2007) Social ties and foreign market entry: an empirical inquiry. Manag Int Rev 47(6):815–844.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-007-0054-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Global Innovation & Leadership, Lucas College & Graduate School of BusinessSan Jose State University (SJSU)San JoséUSA
  2. 2.Enterprise Research Centre, Imperial College Business SchoolImperial College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations