Journal of Insect Conservation

, Volume 22, Issue 5–6, pp 687–706 | Cite as

Response of ground and rove beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae, Staphylinidae) to operational oil sands mine reclamation in northeastern Alberta, a case study

  • H. E. James HammondEmail author
  • Philip G. K. Hoffman
  • Bradley D. Pinno
  • Jaime Pinzon
  • Jan Klimaszewski
  • Dustin J. Hartley


Species loss caused by anthropogenic disturbance threatens forest ecosystems globally. Until 50 years ago, the major sources of boreal forest disturbance in western Canada were a combination of forest wild fire events, pest insect outbreaks, and forest timber harvesting. However, in the 1960s, when the oil boom started in Alberta, oil and gas development along with oil sands mining quickly became another major forest disturbance agent. In this case study we report the effects of operational oil sands mine reclamation on terrestrial arthropod communities and compare them with nearby burned and mature forest sites as a way to provide a benchmark from which to understand the long-term trajectory of recovery for these groups. During the summer of 2016 over 6700 epigaeic beetles were collected using pitfall traps. A total of 43 species of ground beetles and 118 species of rove beetles were collected. Epigaeic beetle assemblages differed between the reclaimed, burned, and mature forest sites. Partitioning of beta diversity in the reclaimed, burned areas and mature forests indicated that species turnover formed the largest component of diversity. Species richness patterns were similar among sites; however, cluster analysis indicated that epigaeic beetle assemblages were only 20% similar between the reclaimed and natural sites. Although ground beetles of the reclaimed area showed positive spatial autocorrelation among treatments, both ground and rove beetles showed responses to the reclamation treatments. The reclaimed areas were dominated by small- to medium-sized open-habitat eurytopic species, whereas the fire and mature forest sites were dominated by larger forest species. The reclaimed area of this case study constitutes a novel, reconstructed ecosystem that is clearly not equivalent in species assemblage to burnt stands of similar age or to mature forest stands.


Biodiversity Mining Remediation Aspen forests Epigaeic beetles Wildfire Oil sands 



The authors would like to thank the following people for their enthusiastic support of this work: Ira Sherr, Sherri Hanlon, and Greg Hook from Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNRL) for providing background information and access to the field sites; Jim Weber, Jennifer Buss, Shelby Feniak, Stephanie Jean, Pierre-Yves Tremblay, and Kyle Stratechuk for their field assistance with collecting insect traps and measurement of environmental data; Myriam Labrecque, Amélie Gilbert, and Laura DeHaas for their help sorting and identifying Staphylinidae. In-kind support of this research was provided by CNRL, a grant from the Office of Energy Research Development—Program for Energy Research Development (OERD-PERD), and funding through the Canadian Forest Service, Natural Resources Canada.

Author contributions

All authors agreed with the content of this manuscript and the choice of journal. All previously published work cited in the manuscript has been fully acknowledged. All authors have contributed substantially to the manuscript and approved the final submission.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

This study was conducted in accordance with rules and regulations governed by the Province of Alberta and Government of Canada.

Supplementary material

10841_2018_94_MOESM1_ESM.xlsx (27 kb)
Appendix A. List of Carabidae and Staphylinidae collected using pitfall traps in mature aspen forest, 5-year-old burned stands and reclamation treatments near Fort Mackay, Alberta, 2016. († Holarctic; * Adventive) (XLSX 26 KB)
10841_2018_94_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx (12 kb)
Appendix B. List of the 10 most common vegetation species surveyed around each pitfall trap in mature aspen forest, 5-year-old burned stands and reclamation treatments near Fort Mackay, Alberta, 2016. (XLSX 12 KB)


  1. Andrés P, Mateos E (2006) Soil mesofaunal responses to post-mining restoration treatments. Appl Soil Ecol 33:67–78. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Archibald HA (2014) Early ecosystem genesis using LFH and peat cover soils in Athabasca Oil Sands reclamation [MSc thesis]. University of Alberta, Department of Renewable Resources, Edmonton, AlbertaGoogle Scholar
  3. Audet P, Pinno BD, Thiffault E (2015) Reclamation of boreal forest after oil sands mining: anticipating novel challenges in novel environments. Can J Forest Res 45(3):364–371. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bagyaraj DJ, Nethravathi CJ, Nitin KS (2016) Chapter 2: Soil biodiversity and arthropods: role in soil fertility. In: Chakravarthy AK, Sridhara S (eds) Economic and ecological significance of arthropods in diversified ecosystems. Springer Publishing, New York pp 17–51Google Scholar
  5. Baker SC, Barmuta LA (2006) Evaluating spatial autocorrelation and depletion in pitfall-trap studies of environmental gradients. J Insect Conserv 10:269–276. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baselga A, Orme CDL (2012) betapart: an R package for the study of beta diversity. Methods Ecol Evol 3:808–812. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beckingham JD, Archibald JH (1996) Field guide to ecosites of northern Alberta. Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Northwest Region, Northern Forestry Centre, Edmonton, Alberta. Special Report 5Google Scholar
  8. Blake S, Foster GN, Eyre MD, Luff ML (1994) Effects of habitat type and grassland management practices on the body size distribution of carabid beetles. Pedobiologia 38:502–512Google Scholar
  9. Blanchet FG, Bergeron JAC, Spence JR, He F (2013) Landscape effects of disturbance, habitat heterogeneity and spatial autocorrelation for a ground beetle (Carabidae) assemblage in mature boreal forest. Ecography 36(5):636–647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Borcard D, Legendre P, Carol A-J, Hanna T (2004) Dissecting the spatial structure of ecological data at multiple scales. Ecology 85(7):1826–1832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Broatch JS, Dosdall LM, Yang RC, Harher KN, Clayton GW (2008) Emergence and seasonal activity of the entomophagous rove beetle Aleochara bilineata (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae) in canola in western Canada. Environ Entomol 37(6):1451–1460. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Brunsting AMH (1980) Distribution patterns, life cycle and phenology of Pterostichus oblongopunctus. F. (Col., Carabidae) and Philonthus decomus Grav. (Col., Staphylinidae). Netherlands J Zool 31(2):418–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Buddle CM, Spence JR, Langor DW (2000) Succession of boreal forest spider assemblages following wildfire and harvesting. Ecography 23:424–436. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Buddle CM, Langor DW, Pohl GR, Spence JR (2006) Arthropod responses to harvesting and wildfire: Implications for emulation of natural disturbance in forest management. Biol Conserv 128(3):346–357. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chao A, Jost L (2012) Coverage-based rarefaction and extrapolation: standardizing samples by completeness rather than size. Ecology 93(12):2533–2547. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Cividanes FJ, Santos-Cividanes TM, Ferraudo AS, da Matta DH (2017) Edge effects on carabid beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) between forest fragments and agricultural fields in south-east Brazil. Austral Entomol. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cobb TP, Langor DW, Spence JR (2007) Biodiversity and multiple disturbances: boreal forest ground beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae) responses to wildfire, harvesting and herbicide. Can J Forest Res 37(8):1310–1323. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. De Caceres M, Legendre P (2013) Indicspecies: relationship between species and groups of sites. R package version 3.2.3Google Scholar
  19. Digweed SC, Currie CR, Cárcamo HA, Spence JR (1995) Digging out the “digging-in effect” of pitfall traps: Influences of depletion and disturbance on catches of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Pedobiologia 39:561–576Google Scholar
  20. Doran JW, Zeiss MR (2000) Soil health and sustainability: managing the biotic component of soil quality. Appl Soil Ecol 15:3–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Drever CR, Peterson G, Messier C, Bergeron Y, Flannigan M (2006) Can forest management based on natural disturbances maintain ecological resilience? Can. J Forest Res 36:2285–2299. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Environment Canada (2014) Canadian climate normals 1981–2010. Environment Canada, Ottawa, ON. Accessed 8 Dec 2017
  23. Errington RC, Pinno BD (2016) Early successional plant community dynamics on a reclaimed oils sands mine in comparison with natural boreal forest communities. Ecoscience. 22:133–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Frank JH (1971) Carabidae (Coleoptera) of an arable field in central Alberta. Quaest Entomol 7:237–252Google Scholar
  25. Giller PS (1996) The diversity of soil communities, the ‘poor man’s tropical rainforest’. Biodivers Conserv 5:135–168. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Government of Alberta (2017) Alberta oil sands, facts and statistics, geography. Alberta’s leased oil sands area. Alberta Energy, Government of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta. Available from Accessed 28 Nov 2017
  27. Gunnarsson B, Nittérus K, Wirdenäs P (2004) Effects of logging residue removal on ground-active beetles in temperate forests. For Ecol Manage 201:229–239. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hammond HEJ, Langor DW, Spence JR (2017) Changes in saproxylic beetle (Insecta: Coleoptera) assemblages following wildfire and harvest in boreal Populus forests. For Ecol Manage 401:319–329. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hódar JA (1996) The use of regression equations for estimation of arthropod biomass in ecological studies. Acta Oecol 17:421–433Google Scholar
  30. Hsieh TC, Ma KH, Chao A (2016) iNEXT: interpolation and extrapolation for species diversity. R package version 3.2.3Google Scholar
  31. Hunter ML (1993) Natural fire regimes as spatial models for managing boreal forests. Biol Conserv 65:115–120. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jarosik V (1989) Mass vs. length relationship for carabid beetles (Col., Carabidae). Pedobiologia 33:87–90Google Scholar
  33. Johansson T, Hjälten J, Olsson J, Dynesius M, Roberge J-M (2016) Long-term effects of clear-cutting on epigaeic beetle assemblages in boreal forests. For Ecol Manage 359:65–73. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jones CE, Landhäusser SM (2018) Plant recolonization of reclamation areas from patches of salvaged forest floor material. Appl Veg Sci 21:94–103. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Klimaszewski J (1984) A revision of the genus Aleochara Gravenhorst of America North of Mexico. Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Canada No. 129. 211 ppGoogle Scholar
  36. Lange M, Türke M, Pašalić E, Boch S, Hessenmöller D, Müller J, Prati D, Socher SA, Fischer M, Weisser WW, Gossner MM (2014) Effects of forest management on ground-dwelling beetles (Coleoptera; Carabidae, Staphylinidae) in Central Europe are mainly mediated by changes in forest structure. For Ecol Manage 329:166–176. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Larochelle A, Larivière M-C (2003) A natural history of the ground-beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) of America North of Mexico. Pensoft, SofiaGoogle Scholar
  38. Larsen CPS (1997) Spatial and temporal variations in boreal forest fire frequency in northern Alberta. J Biogeogr 24:663–673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lavelle P, Decaëns T, Aubert M, Barot S, Blouin M, Bureau F, Margerie P, Mora P, Rossi J-P (2006) Soil invertebrates and ecosystems services. Eur J Soil Biol 42:S3–S15. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Legendre P, Gallagher ED (2001) Ecologically meaningful transformations for ordination of species data. Oecologia 129(2):271–280. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Legendre P, Legendre L (2012) Numerical ecology, 3rd English edn. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  42. Mackenzie DD, Naeth MA (2010) The role of forest soil propagule bank in assisted natural recovery after oil sands mining. Restor Ecol 18:418–427. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Niemelä J, Langor D, Spence JR (1993) Effects of clear cut harvesting on boreal ground-beetle assemblages (Coleoptera, Carabidae) in western Canada. Conserv Biol 7:551–561. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Niemelä J, Kotze DJ, Venn S, Penev L, Stoyanov I, Spence JR, Hartley D, Montes de Oca E (2002) Carabid beetle assemblages (Coleoptera, Carabidae) across urban–rural gradients: an international comparison. Landsc Ecol 17:387–401. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Kindt R, Legendre P, Minchin PR, O’Hara B, Simpson GL, Solymos P, Stevens MHH, Wagner H (2015) vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 3.2.3Google Scholar
  46. Paradis E, Bloomberg S, Bolker B, Brown J et al (2018) ape: analysis of phylogenetics and evolution. R package version 5.1Google Scholar
  47. Pedley SM, Dolman PM (2014) Multi-taxa trait and functional responses to physical disturbance. J Anim Ecol 83:1542–1552. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Pinno BD, Errington RC (2015) Maximizing natural deciduous tree seedling establishment on a reclaimed oil sands site. Ecol Restor 33:43–50. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pinno BD, Hawkes VC (2015) Temporal trends of ecosystem development of different site types of reclaimed boreal forests. Forests 6:2109–2124. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Pinno BD, Landhäusser SM, MacKenzie MD, Quideau SA, Chow PS (2012) Trembling aspen seedling establishment, growth, and response to fertilization on contrasting soils used in oil sands reclamation. Can J Soil Sci 92:143–151. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Pohl GR, Langor DW, Spence JR (2007) Rove beetles and ground beetles (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae, Carabidae) as indicators of harvest and regeneration practices in western Canadian foothills forests. Biol Conserv 137(2):294–307. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. R Core Team (2018) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
  53. Rapport DJ, Regier HA, Hutchinson TC (1985) Ecosystem behaviour under stress. Am Nat 125(5):617–640. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Resource Mapping and Analysis (2014) Alberta’s leased oil sands area [1:1,000,000 map]. Alberta Energy, Government of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta. Accessed 22 Feb 2017
  55. Rooney RC, Bayley SE, Schindler DW (2012) Oil sands mining and reclamation cause massive loss of peatland and stored carbon. Proc Natl Acad Sci. USA 109:4933–4937. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Rowe JS, Scotter GW (1973) Fire in the boreal forest. Quat Res 3:444–464. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. SAS Institute Inc (2012) SAS/STAT for Windows version 9.4. SAS Institute Inc., CaryGoogle Scholar
  58. Schott KM, Snively AEK, Landhäusser SM, Pinno BD (2016) Nutrient loaded seedlings reduce the need for field fertilization and vegetation management on boreal forest reclamation sites. New Forest 47:393–410. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Skalski T, Kędzior R, Szwalec A, Mundala P (2016) Do traditional land rehabilitation processes improve habitat quality and function? Life-history traits of ground beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) say no. Periodicum Biologorum 118(3):185–194. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Snively AEK (2014) Competitive relationships in forest restoration: impact of cover crops and fertilization on tree and understory development [MSc thesis]. University of Alberta, Department of Renewable Resources, Edmonton, AlbertaGoogle Scholar
  61. Socolar JB, Gilroy JJ, Kunin WE, Edwards DP (2016) How should beta-diversity inform biodiversity conservation? Trends Ecol Evol 31(1):67–80. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Soininen J, Heino J, Wang J (2018) A meta-analysis of nestedness and turnover components of beta diversity across organisms and ecosystems. Global Ecol Biogeog 27:96–109. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Tizado EJ, Núñez-Pérez E (2016) Terrestrial arthropods in the initial restoration stages of anthracite coal mine spoil heaps in northwestern Spain: potential usefulness of higher taxa as restoration indicators. Land Degrad Develop 27:1131–1140. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Toivanen T, Heikkilä T, Koivula MJ (2014) Emulating natural disturbances in boreal Norway spruce forests: effects on ground beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae). For Ecol Manage 314:64–74. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. van Eekeren N, de Boer H, Hanegraaf M, Bokhorst J, Nierop D, Bloem J, Schouten T, de Goede R, Brussaard L (2010) Ecosystem services in grassland associated with biotic and abiotic soil parameters. Soil Biol Biochem 42(9):1491–1504. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Vellend M, Verheyen K, Flinn KM, Jaquemyn H et al (2007) Homogenization of forest plant communities and weakening of species-environment relationships via agricultural land use. J Ecol 95(3):565–573. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Webster RP, Smetana A, Sweeney JD, DeMerchant I (2012) New Staphylinidae (Coleoptera) records with new collection data from New Brunswick and an addition to the fauna of Quebec: Staphylininae. Zookeys 186:293–348. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Weir JMH, Johnson EA, Miyanishi K (2000) Fire frequency and the spatial age mosaic of the mixedwood boreal forest in western Canada. Ecol Appl 10:1162–1177. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Work TT, Shorthouse DP, Spence JR, Volney WJA, Langor D (2004) Stand composition and structure of the boreal mixedwood and epigaeic arthropods of the Ecosystem Management Emulating Natural Disturbance (EMEND) landbase in northwestern Alberta. Can J Forest Res 34(2):417–430. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Work TT, Jacobs JM, Spence JR, Volney WJA (2010) High levels of green-tree retention are required to preserve ground beetle biodiversity in boreal mixedwood forests. Ecol Appl 20(3):741–751CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Crown 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Northern Forestry CentreEdmontonCanada
  2. 2.Department of Renewable Resources, 751 General Services BuildingUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonCanada
  3. 3.Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Laurentian Forestry CentreStn. Sainte-Foy, QuebecCanada

Personalised recommendations