Response of ground and rove beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae, Staphylinidae) to operational oil sands mine reclamation in northeastern Alberta, a case study
- 61 Downloads
Species loss caused by anthropogenic disturbance threatens forest ecosystems globally. Until 50 years ago, the major sources of boreal forest disturbance in western Canada were a combination of forest wild fire events, pest insect outbreaks, and forest timber harvesting. However, in the 1960s, when the oil boom started in Alberta, oil and gas development along with oil sands mining quickly became another major forest disturbance agent. In this case study we report the effects of operational oil sands mine reclamation on terrestrial arthropod communities and compare them with nearby burned and mature forest sites as a way to provide a benchmark from which to understand the long-term trajectory of recovery for these groups. During the summer of 2016 over 6700 epigaeic beetles were collected using pitfall traps. A total of 43 species of ground beetles and 118 species of rove beetles were collected. Epigaeic beetle assemblages differed between the reclaimed, burned, and mature forest sites. Partitioning of beta diversity in the reclaimed, burned areas and mature forests indicated that species turnover formed the largest component of diversity. Species richness patterns were similar among sites; however, cluster analysis indicated that epigaeic beetle assemblages were only 20% similar between the reclaimed and natural sites. Although ground beetles of the reclaimed area showed positive spatial autocorrelation among treatments, both ground and rove beetles showed responses to the reclamation treatments. The reclaimed areas were dominated by small- to medium-sized open-habitat eurytopic species, whereas the fire and mature forest sites were dominated by larger forest species. The reclaimed area of this case study constitutes a novel, reconstructed ecosystem that is clearly not equivalent in species assemblage to burnt stands of similar age or to mature forest stands.
KeywordsBiodiversity Mining Remediation Aspen forests Epigaeic beetles Wildfire Oil sands
The authors would like to thank the following people for their enthusiastic support of this work: Ira Sherr, Sherri Hanlon, and Greg Hook from Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNRL) for providing background information and access to the field sites; Jim Weber, Jennifer Buss, Shelby Feniak, Stephanie Jean, Pierre-Yves Tremblay, and Kyle Stratechuk for their field assistance with collecting insect traps and measurement of environmental data; Myriam Labrecque, Amélie Gilbert, and Laura DeHaas for their help sorting and identifying Staphylinidae. In-kind support of this research was provided by CNRL, a grant from the Office of Energy Research Development—Program for Energy Research Development (OERD-PERD), and funding through the Canadian Forest Service, Natural Resources Canada.
All authors agreed with the content of this manuscript and the choice of journal. All previously published work cited in the manuscript has been fully acknowledged. All authors have contributed substantially to the manuscript and approved the final submission.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
This study was conducted in accordance with rules and regulations governed by the Province of Alberta and Government of Canada.
- Archibald HA (2014) Early ecosystem genesis using LFH and peat cover soils in Athabasca Oil Sands reclamation [MSc thesis]. University of Alberta, Department of Renewable Resources, Edmonton, AlbertaGoogle Scholar
- Bagyaraj DJ, Nethravathi CJ, Nitin KS (2016) Chapter 2: Soil biodiversity and arthropods: role in soil fertility. In: Chakravarthy AK, Sridhara S (eds) Economic and ecological significance of arthropods in diversified ecosystems. Springer Publishing, New York pp 17–51Google Scholar
- Beckingham JD, Archibald JH (1996) Field guide to ecosites of northern Alberta. Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Northwest Region, Northern Forestry Centre, Edmonton, Alberta. Special Report 5Google Scholar
- Blake S, Foster GN, Eyre MD, Luff ML (1994) Effects of habitat type and grassland management practices on the body size distribution of carabid beetles. Pedobiologia 38:502–512Google Scholar
- Broatch JS, Dosdall LM, Yang RC, Harher KN, Clayton GW (2008) Emergence and seasonal activity of the entomophagous rove beetle Aleochara bilineata (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae) in canola in western Canada. Environ Entomol 37(6):1451–1460. https://doi.org/10.1603/0046-225X-37.6.1451 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Buddle CM, Spence JR, Langor DW (2000) Succession of boreal forest spider assemblages following wildfire and harvesting. Ecography 23:424–436. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2000.tb00299.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- De Caceres M, Legendre P (2013) Indicspecies: relationship between species and groups of sites. R package version 3.2.3Google Scholar
- Digweed SC, Currie CR, Cárcamo HA, Spence JR (1995) Digging out the “digging-in effect” of pitfall traps: Influences of depletion and disturbance on catches of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Pedobiologia 39:561–576Google Scholar
- Environment Canada (2014) Canadian climate normals 1981–2010. Environment Canada, Ottawa, ON. http://climate.weather.gc.ca/climate_normals/results_1981_2010_e.html. Accessed 8 Dec 2017
- Frank JH (1971) Carabidae (Coleoptera) of an arable field in central Alberta. Quaest Entomol 7:237–252Google Scholar
- Government of Alberta (2017) Alberta oil sands, facts and statistics, geography. Alberta’s leased oil sands area. Alberta Energy, Government of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta. Available from http://www.energy.alberta.ca/OilSands/791.asp. Accessed 28 Nov 2017
- Hódar JA (1996) The use of regression equations for estimation of arthropod biomass in ecological studies. Acta Oecol 17:421–433Google Scholar
- Hsieh TC, Ma KH, Chao A (2016) iNEXT: interpolation and extrapolation for species diversity. R package version 3.2.3Google Scholar
- Jarosik V (1989) Mass vs. length relationship for carabid beetles (Col., Carabidae). Pedobiologia 33:87–90Google Scholar
- Klimaszewski J (1984) A revision of the genus Aleochara Gravenhorst of America North of Mexico. Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Canada No. 129. 211 ppGoogle Scholar
- Lange M, Türke M, Pašalić E, Boch S, Hessenmöller D, Müller J, Prati D, Socher SA, Fischer M, Weisser WW, Gossner MM (2014) Effects of forest management on ground-dwelling beetles (Coleoptera; Carabidae, Staphylinidae) in Central Europe are mainly mediated by changes in forest structure. For Ecol Manage 329:166–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2014.06.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Larochelle A, Larivière M-C (2003) A natural history of the ground-beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) of America North of Mexico. Pensoft, SofiaGoogle Scholar
- Legendre P, Legendre L (2012) Numerical ecology, 3rd English edn. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
- Niemelä J, Langor D, Spence JR (1993) Effects of clear cut harvesting on boreal ground-beetle assemblages (Coleoptera, Carabidae) in western Canada. Conserv Biol 7:551–561. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1993.07030551.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Kindt R, Legendre P, Minchin PR, O’Hara B, Simpson GL, Solymos P, Stevens MHH, Wagner H (2015) vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 3.2.3Google Scholar
- Paradis E, Bloomberg S, Bolker B, Brown J et al (2018) ape: analysis of phylogenetics and evolution. R package version 5.1Google Scholar
- R Core Team (2018) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.r-project.org/
- Resource Mapping and Analysis (2014) Alberta’s leased oil sands area [1:1,000,000 map]. Alberta Energy, Government of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta. http://www.energy.gov.ab.ca/LandAccess/pdfs/OSAagreeStats.pdf. Accessed 22 Feb 2017
- SAS Institute Inc (2012) SAS/STAT for Windows version 9.4. SAS Institute Inc., CaryGoogle Scholar
- Skalski T, Kędzior R, Szwalec A, Mundala P (2016) Do traditional land rehabilitation processes improve habitat quality and function? Life-history traits of ground beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) say no. Periodicum Biologorum 118(3):185–194. https://doi.org/10.18054/pb.2016.118.3.3915 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Snively AEK (2014) Competitive relationships in forest restoration: impact of cover crops and fertilization on tree and understory development [MSc thesis]. University of Alberta, Department of Renewable Resources, Edmonton, AlbertaGoogle Scholar
- Tizado EJ, Núñez-Pérez E (2016) Terrestrial arthropods in the initial restoration stages of anthracite coal mine spoil heaps in northwestern Spain: potential usefulness of higher taxa as restoration indicators. Land Degrad Develop 27:1131–1140. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.2280 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- van Eekeren N, de Boer H, Hanegraaf M, Bokhorst J, Nierop D, Bloem J, Schouten T, de Goede R, Brussaard L (2010) Ecosystem services in grassland associated with biotic and abiotic soil parameters. Soil Biol Biochem 42(9):1491–1504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.05.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Work TT, Shorthouse DP, Spence JR, Volney WJA, Langor D (2004) Stand composition and structure of the boreal mixedwood and epigaeic arthropods of the Ecosystem Management Emulating Natural Disturbance (EMEND) landbase in northwestern Alberta. Can J Forest Res 34(2):417–430. https://doi.org/10.1139/x03-238 CrossRefGoogle Scholar