Advertisement

Midrange ejection fraction as a risk factor for deterioration of cardiofunction after permanent pacemaker implantation

  • Hua HeEmail author
  • XiaoDong Li
  • BingBing Ke
  • Zhuo Chen
  • FuSheng Han
  • YuJie ZengEmail author
MULTIMEDIA REPORT

Abstract

Purpose

To determine whether the midrange ejection fraction (mrEF) is associated with increased risk of deterioration of cardiac function (DCF) after dual chamber permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation.

Methods

We performed a prospective cohort study of relevance in patients with EF ≥ 40% and indications for PPMs. Patient characteristics were recorded at baseline and 1 day, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after PPM implantation with leads placed in the right ventricular apex. These included clinical symptoms, signs, biochemical parameters, BNP, echocardiography and ECG parameters, and pacing-related parameter changes. The patients were followed-up for 6 months. Univariate and multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed.

Results

A total of 879 patients were included, aged 35 to 88 years (mean age 67.2 ± 9.6); a total of 81 patients (9.2%) developed DCF after PPM implantation, including LVEF < 40% (57 cases) and increased NYHA class (24 cases). Cox models demonstrated that age ≥ 75 years (HR 2.273 [95% CI, 1.541–3.626]), OMI (HR 2.078 [95% CI, 1.275–3.604]), mrEF (HR 2.762 [95% CI, 1.558–4.769]), moderate mitral regurgitation (HR 2.819 [95% CI, 1.604–4.153]), and right ventricular pacing ≥ 50% (HR 2.311 [95% CI, 1.478–3.937]) were strong predictors for DCF, and NT-proBNP > 1000 ng/L and paced QRS duration ≥ 180 ms were also the independent predictors of DCF.

Conclusions

MrEF was associated with increased risk of deterioration of cardiac function after PPM implantation. Moderate mitral regurgitation and increased NT-proBNP levels are also potential independent predictors for deterioration of cardiac function after PPM implantation.

Keywords

Permanent pacemaker implantation Heart failure Midrange ejection fraction B-type natriuretic peptide 

Notes

Funding information

This study was funded by the Cultivating Project Grants of Beijing for Highly Talented Men of Medicine (2014-3-042) and the Basic Clinical Research Program of Capital Medical University (17JL15).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of the Anzhen Hospital and Beijing Institute of Heart Lung and Blood Vessel Diseases.

Supplementary material

10840_2019_513_MOESM1_ESM.doc (82 kb)
ESM 1 (DOC 82 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Shukla HH, Hellkamp AS, James EA, Flaker GC, Lee KL, Sweeney MO, et al. Heart failure hospitalization is more common in pacemaker patients with sinus node dysfunction and a prolonged paced QRS duration. Heart Rhythm. 2005;2(3):245–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cho Ej, Park S-J, Park KM, et al. Paced QT interval as a risk factor for new-onset left ventricular systolic dysfunction and cardiac death after permanent pacemaker implantation. Int J Cardiol. 2016;203:158–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Anand IS, Fisher LD, Chiang YT, Latini R, Masson S, Maggioni AP, et al. Changes in brain natriuretic peptide and norepinephrine over time and mortality and morbidity in the Valsartan Heart Failure Trial (Val-HeFT). Circulation. 2003;107(9):1278–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Miyoshi F, Kobayashi Y, Itou H, et al. Prolonged paced QRS duration as a predictor for congestive heart failure in patients with right ventricular apical pacing. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2005;28(11):1182–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brignole M, Auricchio A, Baron-Esquivias G, et al. ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy: the Task Force on cardiac pacing and resynchronization therapy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA). Eur Heart J. 2013;34(29):2281–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ponikowski P, Voors AA, Anker SD, et al. ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: the Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Developed with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur J Heart Fail. 2016;18(8):891–975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Curtis AB, Worley SJ, Chung ES, Li P, Christman SA, St. John Sutton M. Improvement in clinical outcomes with biventricular versus right ventricular pacing: the BLOCK HF study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67(18):2148–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Smith SC, Allen J, Blair SN, et al. AHA/ACC Guidelines for secondary prevention for patients with coronary and other atherosclerotic vascular disease: 2006 update. Circulation. 2006;113:2363–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    James PA, Oparil S, Carter BL, et al. 2014 evidence-based guideline for the management of high blood pressure in adults: report from the panel members appointed to the Eighth Joint National Committee (JNC 8). Jama. 2014;311(5):507–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lip GY, Windecker S, Huber K, et al. Management of antithrombotic therapy in atrial fibrillation patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome and/or undergoing percutaneous coronary or valve interventions: a joint consensus document of the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Thrombosis, European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI) and European Association of Acute Cardiac Care (ACCA) endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) and Asia-Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS). Eur Heart J. 2014;35(45):3155–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tompkins C, Henrikson CA. Our approach to anticoagulation in patients undergoing device implants or replacement. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2013;24(1):110–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yancy CW, Jessup M, Bozkurt B, et al. ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62(16):e147–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zoghbi WA, Enriquez-Sarano M, Foster E, et al. Recommendations for evaluation of the severity of native valvular regurgitation with two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2003;16(7):777–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    McLaughlin VV, Archer SL, Badesch DB, et al. ACCF/AHA 2009 expert consensus document on pulmonary hypertension a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents and the American Heart Association developed in collaboration with the American College of Chest Physicians; American Thoracic Society, Inc.; and the Pulmonary Hypertension Association. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53(17):1573–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sakatani T, Sakamoto A, Kawamura K, Tanigaki T, Tsubakimoto Y, Isodono K, et al. Clinical outcome after permanent pacemaker implantation in patients with a high percentage of ventricular pacing. Int Heart J. 2015;56(6):622–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sweeney MO, Hellkamp AS. Heart failure during cardiac pacing. Circulation. 2006;113(17):2082–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kapoor JR, Kapoor R, Ju C, Heidenreich PA, Eapen ZJ, Hernandez AF, et al. Precipitating clinical factors, heart failure characterization, and outcomes in patients hospitalized with heart failure with reduced, borderline, and preserved ejection fraction. JACC Heart Fail. 2016;4(6):464–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hwang SJ, Melenovsky V, Borlaug BA. Implications of coronary artery disease in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63(25 Pt A):2817–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ueda T, Kawakami R, Nishida T, Onoue K, Soeda T, Okayama S, et al. Left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) of 55% as cutoff for late transition from heart failure (HF) with preserved EF to HF with mildly reduced EF. Circ J. 2015;79(10):2209–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dunlay SM, Roger VL, Weston SA, Jiang R, Redfield MM. Longitudinal changes in ejection fraction in heart failure patients with preserved and reduced ejection fraction. Circ Heart Fail. 2012;5(6):720–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Clarke CL, Grunwald GK, Allen LA, Barón AE, Peterson PN, Brand DW, et al. Natural history of left ventricular ejection fraction in patients with heart failure. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2013;6(6):680–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Martinelli Filho, M., S.F. de Siqueira, R. Costa, et al., Conventional versus biventricular pacing in heart failure and bradyarrhythmia: the COMBAT study. J Card Fail, 2010. 16(4): p. 293–300.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kindermann M, Hennen B, Jung J, Geisel J, Böhm M, Fröhlig G. Biventricular versus conventional right ventricular stimulation for patients with standard pacing indication and left ventricular dysfunction: the Homburg Biventricular Pacing Evaluation (HOBIPACE). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47(10):1927–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lewicka-Nowak, E., A. Dabrowska-Kugacka, S. Tybura, et al., Right ventricular apex versus right ventricular outflow tract pacing: prospective, randomised, long-term clinical and echocardiographic evaluation. Kardiol Pol, 2006. 64(10): p. 1082–91; discussion 1092–3.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Tse HF, Wong KK, Siu CW, et al. Upgrading pacemaker patients with right ventricular apical pacing to right ventricular septal pacing improves left ventricular performance and functional capacity. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2009;20(8):901–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hu P, Liu XB, Liang J, Zhu QF, Pu CX, Tang MY, et al. A hospital-based survey of patients with severe valvular heart disease in China. Int J Cardiol. 2017;231:244–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Januzzi JL Jr, Richards M. An international consensus statement regarding amino-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide testing: the international NT-proBNP consensus panel - introduction. Am J Cardiol. 2008;101(3A):1–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Masson S, Latini R, Anand IS, Barlera S, Angelici L, Vago T, et al. Prognostic value of changes in N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide in Val-HeFT (Valsartan Heart Failure Trial). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52(12):997–1003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Berger R, Moertl D, Peter S, Ahmadi R, Huelsmann M, Yamuti S, et al. N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide-guided, intensive patient management in addition to multidisciplinary care in chronic heart failure a 3-arm, prospective, randomized pilot study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55(7):645–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lainchbury JG, Troughton RW, Strangman KM, Frampton CM, Pilbrow A, Yandle TG, et al. N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide-guided treatment for chronic heart failure: results from the BATTLESCARRED (NT-proBNP-Assisted Treatment To Lessen Serial Cardiac Readmissions and Death) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;55(1):53–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Gandhi PU, Szymonifka J, Motiwala SR, Belcher AM, Januzzi JL Jr, Gaggin HK. Characterization and prediction of adverse events from intensive chronic heart failure management and effect on quality of life: results from the pro-B-type natriuretic peptide outpatient-tailored chronic heart failure therapy (PROTECT) study. J Card Fail. 2015;21(1):9–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Gaggin HK, Mohammed AA, Bhardwaj A, Rehman SU, Gregory SA, Weiner RB, et al. Heart failure outcomes and benefits of NT-proBNP-guided management in the elderly: results from the prospective, randomized ProBNP outpatient tailored chronic heart failure therapy (PROTECT) study. J Card Fail. 2012;18(8):626–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Rehman SU, Martinez-Rumayor A, Mueller T, Januzzi JL Jr. Independent and incremental prognostic value of multimarker testing in acute dyspnea: results from the ProBNP Investigation of Dyspnea in the Emergency Department (PRIDE) study. Clin Chim Acta. 2008;392(1–2):41–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Zhang XH, Chen H, Siu CW, et al. New-onset heart failure after permanent right ventricular apical pacing in patients with acquired high-grade atrioventricular block and normal left ventricular function. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2008;19(2):136–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Khurshid S, Epstein AE, Verdino RJ, Lin D, Goldberg LR, Marchlinski FE, et al. Incidence and predictors of right ventricular pacing-induced cardiomyopathy. Heart Rhythm. 2014;11(9):1619–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Udo EO, van Hemel NM, Zuithoff NP, et al. Risk of heart failure- and cardiac death gradually increases with more right ventricular pacing. Int J Cardiol. 2015;185:95–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Sweeney MO, Hellkamp AS, Ellenbogen KA, Greenspon AJ, Freedman RA, Lee KL, et al. Adverse effect of ventricular pacing on heart failure and atrial fibrillation among patients with normal baseline QRS duration in a clinical trial of pacemaker therapy for sinus node dysfunction. Circulation. 2003;107(23):2932–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Olshansky B, Day JD, Lerew DR, Brown S, Stolen KQ. Eliminating right ventricular pacing may not be best for patients requiring implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. Heart Rhythm. 2007;4(7):886–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Wilkoff BL, Cook JR, Epstein AE, et al. Dual-chamber pacing or ventricular backup pacing in patients with an implantable defibrillator: the Dual Chamber and VVI Implantable Defibrillator (DAVID) Trial. JAMA. 2002;288(24):3115–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Smith GL, Masoudi FA, Vaccarino V, Radford MJ, Krumholz HM. Outcomes in heart failure patients with preserved ejection fraction: mortality, readmission, and functional decline. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;41(9):1510–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Mazza A, Bendini MG, Leggio M, Riva U, Ciardiello C, Valsecchi S, et al. Incidence and predictors of heart failure hospitalization and death in permanent pacemaker patients: a single-centre experience over medium-term follow-up. Europace. 2013;15(9):1267–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Emergency Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen HospitalCapital Medical UniversityBeijingPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Department of Echocardiography, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Beijing Institute of Heart, Lung and Blood Vessel DiseasesCapital Medical UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations