Catheter ablation for supraventricular tachycardia in children ≤ 20 kg using an electroanatomical system
- 16 Downloads
Catheter ablation is the only choice of treatment in some small children with medically refractory supraventricular tachycardia (SVT). Electroanatomical mapping systems (EMS) are more commonly utilized in electrophysiological procedures in recent years, which resulted in a significant decrease in fluoroscopy exposure. The potential benefit of EMS in small children has not been studied. Therefore, we investigated the outcomes of children undergoing catheter ablation weighing ≤ 20 kg using an electroanatomical mapping system.
This study evaluated the outcomes, characteristics, and follow-ups of children ≤ 20 kg who underwent SVT ablations between April 2012 and April 2018 in a pediatric electrophysiology center where EMS were routinely used.
In a 6-year period, 1129 children underwent SVT catheter ablation under EMS guidance at our institution. A total of 84 of them were weighing ≤ 20 kg. The acute success rate was 97.6% in 85 tachycardia substrates. No fluoroscopy was used in 58 of the patients, while a median of 5 (4–14) min of fluoroscopy was used in the remaining 26 patients. Recurrences were seen in 4 patients (4.8%) at a mean follow-up of 3.89 ± 2.08 years. Five patients developed non-vital complications (2 right bundle block and 3 temporary complete block that spontaneously resolved during the procedure).
The outcome of catheter ablation with the guidance of EMS for the treatment of SVT in small children is favorable. Fluoroscopy exposure can be decreased and even eliminated in most patients.
KeywordsSmall children Catheter ablation Electroanatomical mapping systems Supraventricular tachycardia Fluoroscopy exposure
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from the children’s parents/guardians.
Research involving with human and animal participants
This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.
- 6.Gerber TC, Carr JJ, Arai AE, Dixon RL, Ferrari VA, Gomes AS, et al. Ionizing radiation in cardiac imaging: a science advisory from the American Heart Association Committee on Cardiac Imaging of the Council on Clinical Cardiology and Committee on Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention of the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention. Circulation. 2009;119:1056–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Brugada J, Blom N, Sarquella-Brugada G, Blomstrom-Lundqvist C, Deanfield J, Janousek J, et al. Pharmacological and non-pharmacological therapy for arrhythmias in the pediatric population: EHRA and AEPC-Arrhythmia Working Group joint consensus statement. Europace. 2013;15:1337–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Bashore TM, Bates ER, Berger PB, Clark DA, Cusma JT, Dehmer GJ, et al. Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents. American College of Cardiology/Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions Clinical Expert Consensus Document on cardiac catheterization laboratory standards. A report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;37:2170–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Venneri L, Rossi F, Botto N, Andreassi MG, Salcone N, Emad A, et al. Cancer risk from professional exposure in staff working in cardiac catheterization laboratory: insights from the National Research Council’s Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation VII Report. Am Heart J. 2009;157:118–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.De Ponti R. Cryothermal energy ablation of cardiac arrhythmias 2005: state of the art. Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2005;1:12–24.Google Scholar
- 28.Papagiannis J, Papadopoulou K, Rammos S, Katritsis D. Cryoablation versus radiofrequency ablation for atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia in children: long-term results. Hell J Cardiol. 2010;51:122–6.Google Scholar