Public reporting on cardiac electrophysiology procedures and outcomes: where are we now and where are we headed?
Over the years, public reporting of patient outcomes has been promoted as a means to improve healthcare quality. More recently, in response to dramatic rises in healthcare costs, the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act (MACRA) of 2015 was implemented in an effort to link quality with reimbursement. As part of a value-based model, public reporting of procedural outcomes has been incorporated into this initiative. Outcomes measures that have been introduced in cardiology include heart failure readmission and post-myocardial infarction medication prescription. Public reporting of these data has led not only to positive changes but also to unintended negative consequences. The limited number of existing registries and lack of clear consensus on quality metrics have posed challenges for quality and value assessment in cardiac electrophysiology. After learning from the lessons of existing models of public reporting, physicians, professional societies, stakeholders, and patients will need to collaborate to develop a health care model that can improve outcomes and reduce waste.
KeywordsElectrophysiology Outcome and performance measures Public reporting
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
Dr. Jim W. Cheung has received consulting fees from Biosense Webster, speaker honoraria from Zoll, research grant support from Biotronik, and fellowship grant support from Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, and St. Jude Medical. Dr. Kim has no relevant disclosures.
Ethical approval on research involving human participants and/or animals
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
- 5.Findlay S. Health policy brief: implementing MACRA. Health Aff (Millwood) 2017.Google Scholar
- 7.http://www.medicare.gov/hospitalcompare/Data/Measures-Displayed.html. Accessed March 2018.
- 19.https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02699957. Accessed March 2018.
- 20.https://cvquality.acc.org/NCDR-Home/registries/hospital-registries/afib-registry. Accessed March 2018.
- 21.Fontenla A, Garcia-Fernandez J, Ibanez JL, Spanish Catheter Ablation Registry collaborators. Spanish catheter ablation registry. 16th official report of the Spanish society of cardiology working group on electrophysiology and arrhythmias (2016). Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2017;70(11):971–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Krantz MJ, Ambardekar AV, Kaltenbach L, Hernandez AF, Heidenreich PA, Fonarow GC. Get With the Guidelines Steering Committee and Hospitals. Patterns and predictors of evidence-based medication continuation among hospitalized heart failure patients (from Get with the guidelines-heart failure). Am J Cardiol. 2011;107(12):1818–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.Salerno AM, Horwitz LI, Kwon JY, Herrin J, Grady JN, Lin Z, et al. Trends in readmission rates for safety net hospitals and non-safety net hospitals in the era of the US hospital readmission reduction program: a retrospective time series analysis using Medicare administrative claims data from 2008 to 2015. BMJ Open. 2017;7:e016149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.Matlock DD, Peterson PN, Wang Y, Curtis JP, Reynolds MR, Varosy PD, et al. Variation in use of dual-chamber implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: results from the national cardiovascular data registry. Arch Intern Med. 2012;172(8):634,41.Google Scholar
- 34.Dunlay SM, Alexander KP, Melloni C, Kraschnewski JL, Liang L, Gibler WB, et al. Medical records and quality care in acute coronary syndromes. JAMA. 2008;168(15):1692–8.Google Scholar