Advertisement

Electrical isolation of the superior vena cava by laser balloon ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation

  • Martín R. Arceluz
  • Pedro F. Cruz
  • Estela Falconi
  • Rosa Montes de Oca
  • Reina Delgado
  • Jorge Figueroa
  • Marta Ortega
  • José L. Merino
Article
  • 59 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of the present study is to evaluate the feasibility and safety of SVC electrical isolation by LB ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) referred for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI).

Methods

Electrical disconnection of the SVC was attempted by LB in 13 consecutive patients (59 ± 10.5 years, 11 male) with AF following PVI. PVI was successfully achieved by standard LB in all before attempting SVC isolation.

Results

A laser beam was delivered with 6.3 ± 2.3 W and 8.4 ± 2.7 W (P = 0.001) during 5.38 ± 2.4 min and 9.75 ± 1.6 min (P = 0.024) to achieve SVC and PV, respectively. Isolation of the SVC by LB was accomplished in 8 patients (61%) without complications. Phrenic nerve palsy developed in 3 patients (23%), which resulted in early procedure termination before isolation. Technical problems or interposition of a pacemaker lead to prevented SVC isolation in the remaining 2 patients. After a mean follow-up of 19 ± 3 months, no patient recovered from phrenic nerve palsy.

Conclusions

SVC isolation by LB is feasible but associated with a high risk of phrenic nerve palsy. Limitation of laser delivery time and power appears insufficient to prevent this complication.

Keywords

Superior vena cava Laser balloon ablation Atrial fibrillation Pulmonary vein isolation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge Kathleen Johanna Mc Ewen for the linguistic revision of the article.

Authors’ contribution

Data Collection: Pedro F. Cruz, Estela Falconi, Rosa Montes de Oca, Reina, Delgado, Jorge Figueroa, Marta Ortega.

Critical revision of Article: José L. Merino.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Terasawa T, Balk EM, Chung M, Garlitski AC, Alsheikh-Ali AA, Lau J, et al. Systematic review: comparative effectiveness of radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(3):191–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Noheria A, Kumar A, Wylie J, Josephson ME. Catheter ablation vs antiarrhythmic drug therapy for atrial fibrillation: a systematic review. Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(6):581–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cappato R, Calkins H, Chen SA, Davies W, Iesaka Y, Kalman J, et al. Updated worldwide survey on the methods, efficacy, and safety of catheter ablation for human atrial fibrillation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2010;3(1):32–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Andrade JG, Khairy P, Guerra PG, Deyell MW, Rivard L, Macle L, et al. Efficacy and safety of cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation: a systematic review of published studies. Heart Rhythm. 2011;8(11):1828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kojodjojo P, O’Neill MD, Lim PB, Malcolm-Lawes L, Whinnett ZI, Salukhe TV, et al. Pulmonary venous isolation by antral ablation with a large cryoballoon for treatment of paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation: medium-term outcome and nonrandomised comparison with pulmonary venous isolation by radiofrequency ablation. Heart. 2010;96(17):1379–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gerstenfeld EP, Ren JF, Marchlinski FE. Atrial tachycardia successfully treated by electrical isolation of the superior vena cava. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2003;26:906–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Arruda M, Mlcochova H, Prasad SK, Kilicaslan F, Saliba W, Patel D, et al. Electrical isolation of the superior vena cava: an adjunctive strategy to pulmonary vein antrum isolation improving the outcome of AF ablation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2007;18(12):1261–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nademanee K, McKenzie J, Kosar E, Schwab M, Sunsaneewitayakul B, Vasavakul T, et al. A new approach for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: mapping of the electrophysiologic substrate. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;43:2044–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tsai CF, Tai CT, Hsieh MH, Lin WS, Yu WC, Ueng KC, et al. Initiation of atrial fibrillation by ectopic beat originating from superior vena cava; electrophysiological characteristics and results of radiofrequency ablation. Circulation. 2000;102:67–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Merino JL, Peinado R, Abello M, Gnoatto M, Vasserot MG, Sobrino JA. Superior vena cava flutter: electrophysiology and ablation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2005 Jun;16(6):568–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Haïssaguerre M, Hocini M, Sanders P, et al. Catheter ablation of long-lasting persistent atrial fibrillation: clinical outcome and mechanism of subsequent arrhythmias. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2005;16(11):1138–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ejima K, Kato K, Iwanami Y, Henmi R, Yagishita D, Malaka T, et al. Impact of an empiric isolation of the superior vena cava in addition to circumferential pulmonary vein isolation on the outcome of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ablation. Am J Cardiol. 2015;116(11):1711–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Murat S, Kudret A, Hikmet Y. Innappropriate sinus tachycardia after superior vena cava isolation in addition to pulmonary veins Isolatin of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation cryoballoon ablation. J Atr Fibrillation. 2015;8(2):1270.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Schmidt B, Metzner A, Chun KR, Leftheriosis D, Yoshiga Y, Fuernkranz A, et al. Feasibility of circumferential pulmonary vein isolation using a novel endoscopic ablation system. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2010;3(5):481–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hsieh MH, Chen SA. Is it necessary to routinely perform isolation of the superior vena cava in every atrial fibrillation patients? J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2007;18:1267–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Corrado A, Bonso A, Madalosso M, Rosillo A, Themistoclakis S, Di Biase L, et al. Impact of systematic isolation of superior vena cava in addition to pulmonary vein antrum isolation on the outcome of paroxysmal, persistent, and permanent atrial fibrillation ablation: results from a randomized study. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2010;21(1):1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wang XH, Liu X, Sun YM, Shi HF, Zhou L, Gu JN. Pulmonary vein isolation combined with superior vena cava isolation for atrial fibrillation ablation: a prospective randomized study. Europace. 2008;10(5):600–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dib C, Kapa S, Powell B, Packer D, Asirvatham S. Successful use of “cryo-mapping” to avoid phrenic nerve damage during ostial superior vena caval ablation despite nerve proximity. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2008;22:23–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sacher F, Monahan KH, Thomas SP, Davidson N, Adragao P, Sanders P, et al. Phrenic nerve injury after atrial fibrillation catheter ablation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47:2498–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Miyazaki S, Usui E, Kusa S, Taniguchi H, Ichihara N, Takagi T, et al. Prevalence and clinical outcome of phrenic nerve injury during superior vena cava isolation and circumferential pulmonary vein antrum isolation using radiofrequency energy. Am Heart J. 2014;168:846–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Linhart M, Nielson A, Andrié RP, Mittmann-Braun EL, Stöckigt F, Kreuz J, et al. Fluoroscopy of spontaneous breathing is more sensitive than phrenic nerve stimulation for detection of right phrenic nerve injury during cryoballoon ablation of atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2014;25:859–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Miyazaki S, Hachiya H, Taniguchi H, Nakamura H, Ichihara N, Usui E, et al. Prospective evaluation of bilateral diaphragmatic electromyograms during cryoballooon ablation of atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2015;26:622–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Dukkipati SR, Kuck KH, Neuzil P, Woollett I, Kautzner J, Mc Elderry HT, et al. Pulmonary vein isolation using a visually guided laser balloon catheter: the first 200-patient multicenter clinical experience. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013;6(3):467–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bordignon S, Chun KR, Gunawardene M, Fuernkranz A, Urban V, Schulte-Hahn B, et al. Comparison of balloon catheter ablation technologies for pulmonary vein isolation: the laser versus cryo study. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2013;24(9):987–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bunch TJ, Bruce GK, Mahapatra S, Johnson SB, Miller DV, Sabanda AV, et al. Mechanisms of phrenic nerve injury during radiofrequency ablation at the pulmonary vein orifice. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2005;16:1318–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Arceluz MR, Merino JL, Cruz F, Falconi E, Salvador O, Figueroa J, et al. Pulmonary vein isolation by laser balloon ablation: is energy delivered too deep into the vein? (Abstract). Eur Heart J. 2016;37(Issue suppl_1, 1 August):1084.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Arrhythmias and Electrophysiology Robotic UnitLa Paz University HospitalMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations