Endomyocardial biopsy at the time of ablation or device implantation

  • Ammar M. Killu
  • Nishaki Mehta
  • Qi Zheng
  • Piotr Sobieszczyk
  • Usha B. Tedrow
  • William G. Stevenson
  • Roy M. John
Article
  • 47 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

Cardiomyopathies frequently lead to conduction system disease and/or arrhythmias necessitating device therapy, catheter ablation, or both. Endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) is avoided with recent right ventricle (RV) lead implants and optimal timing is uncertain. We determined outcomes of EMB at the time of ablation or device implantation procedures.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed patients undergoing EMB during their electrophysiological procedure between January 2014 and July 2016. EMB was obtained using cephalic/subclavian access prior to device implants or femoral venous/arterial access after ablation procedures. Sites of electrogram (EGM) abnormality and/or scar on imaging were targeted when possible.

Results

Twenty-five patients (23 male, 59.7 ± 15.1 years) were included. Sixteen had reduced ejection fraction. EMB was performed during device implants in 9, during ablation in 13, and during combined procedures in 3 patients. RV and left ventricle (LV) EMB were obtained in 19 and 6 patients, respectively. 3.9 ± 1.8 samples/patient (median 4) were obtained. EMB yielded a diagnosis in 7 (28%, all RV) patients (4 cardiac implantable electronic device implantation, 2 ablation, and 1 both): cardiac amyloid in 4, lymphocytic myocarditis in 2, and cardiac sarcoid in 1. All 7 patients had imaging or voltage abnormalities in the chamber biopsied. Abnormal but non-diagnostic findings, most commonly fibrotic change, were found in 14 patients. At mean follow-up of 1.1 ± 0.9 years, 5 other patients received a clinical diagnosis (3 cardiac sarcoid, 1 arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy, and 1 Brugada syndrome/arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy overlap syndrome). Two patients developed minor device pocket hematomas and one developed pericardial effusion (underwent concomitant epicardial mapping and ablation for VT).

Conclusions

RV or LV EMB can be performed safely during EP procedures and can assist with diagnosis, influencing management. EGM-guided EMB in patients presenting with scar-related VT was low yield for specific pathologies.

Keywords

Biopsy Cardiomyopathy Arrhythmia Sarcoidosis Electroanatomical mapping 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Approval by the Brigham and Women’s Hospital Institutional Committee on Human Research was obtained for this study.

Conflict of interest

Roy John, MD, received lecture honorarium from Abbott and research support from Biosense Webster, Abbott.

References

  1. 1.
    Sekiguchi M, Numao Y, Imai M, Furuie T, Mikami R. Clinical and histopathological profile of sarcoidosis of the heart and acute idiopathic myocarditis. Concepts through a study employing endomyocardial biopsy. I. Sarcoidosis. Jpn Circ J. 1980;44(4):249–63.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Uemura A, Morimoto S, Hiramitsu S, Kato Y, Ito T, Hishida H. Histologic diagnostic rate of cardiac sarcoidosis: evaluation of endomyocardial biopsies. Am Heart J. 1999;138(2 Pt 1):299–302.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cooper LT, Baughman KL, Feldman AM, Frustaci A, Jessup M, Kuhl U, et al. The role of endomyocardial biopsy in the management of cardiovascular disease: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association, the American College of Cardiology, and the European Society of Cardiology. Circulation. 2007;116(19):2216–33.  https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.186093.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Liang JJ, Hebl VB, DeSimone CV, Madhavan M, Nanda S, Kapa S et al. Electrogram guidance: a method to increase the precision and diagnostic yield of endomyocardial biopsy for suspected cardiac sarcoidosis and myocarditis. JACC Heart Fail. 2014;2(5):466–473. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchf.2014.03.015.
  5. 5.
    Casella M, Pizzamiglio F, Dello Russo A, Carbucicchio C, Al-Mohani G, Russo E, et al. Feasibility of combined unipolar and bipolar voltage maps to improve sensitivity of endomyocardial biopsy. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2015;8(3):625–32.  https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.114.002216.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Avella A, Pappalardo A, d'Amati G, Dello Russo A, Laurenzi F, Mancini M, et al. Endomyocardial biopsy guided by electroanatomic voltage mapping in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy: a case report. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2007;18(9):991–3.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8167.2007.00807.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ejima K, Shoda M, Manaka T, Hagiwara N. Targeted endomyocardial biopsy using electroanatomical voltage mapping in the early stage of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy. Europace. 2009;11(3):388–9.  https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/eun357.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Seizer P, Klingel K, Stickel J, Dorn C, Horger M, Kandolf R, et al. Left ventricular site-directed biopsy guided by left ventricular voltage mapping: a proof of principle. Int J Cardiol. 2013;168(3):3113–4.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.04.068.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kandolin R, Lehtonen J, Kupari M. Cardiac sarcoidosis and giant cell myocarditis as causes of atrioventricular block in young and middle-aged adults. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2011;4(3):303–9.  https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.110.959254.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chimenti C, Frustaci A. Contribution and risks of left ventricular endomyocardial biopsy in patients with cardiomyopathies: a retrospective study over a 28-year period. Circulation. 2013;128(14):1531–41.  https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.13.001414.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Polin GM, Haqqani H, Tzou W, Hutchinson MD, Garcia FC, Callans DJ, et al. Endocardial unipolar voltage mapping to identify epicardial substrate in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia. Heart Rhythm. 2011;8(1):76–83.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2010.09.088.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ammar M. Killu
    • 1
  • Nishaki Mehta
    • 2
  • Qi Zheng
    • 3
  • Piotr Sobieszczyk
    • 3
  • Usha B. Tedrow
    • 3
  • William G. Stevenson
    • 4
  • Roy M. John
    • 4
  1. 1.Mayo ClinicRochesterUSA
  2. 2.University of Virginia Medical CenterCharlottesvilleUSA
  3. 3.Brigham and Women’s HospitalBostonUSA
  4. 4.Vanderbilt University Medical CenterNashvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations