Advertisement

Journal for General Philosophy of Science

, Volume 50, Issue 4, pp 409–427 | Cite as

Inquiring into Space-Time, the Human Mind, and Religion: The Life and Work of Adolf Grünbaum (1923–2018)

  • Martin CarrierEmail author
  • Gereon Wolters
Obituary
  • 49 Downloads

Abstract

Grünbaum's three chief fields of research were space-time philosophy, the methodological credentials of psychoanalysis, and reasons given in favor of the existence of God. Grünbaum defended the so-called conventionality thesis of physical geometry. He partially followed Hans Reichenbach in this respect but developed a new ontological argument for the conventionality claim in addition. In addressing the physical basis of the direction of time, Grünbaum advocated that there is a physical basis for the distinction between the past and the future (or the anisotropy of time), but no such basis for the idea of a ‘present’ moving through time. His main claim in scrutinizing Freud’s theory methodologically was that supporting the causal claims Freud made would have required data that go beyond the clinical setting. Finally, Grünbaum worked on the philosophy of religion and set out to undermine arguments for the existence of God.

Keywords

Adolf Grünbaum Space-time philosophy Conventionalism Being and becoming Psychoanalysis Sigmund Freud Theism 

Notes

References

  1. Čapek, M. (1961). The philosophical impact of contemporary physics. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand.Google Scholar
  2. Carrier, M. (1993). Physical force or geometrical curvature? Einstein, Grünbaum, and the measurability of physical geometry. In J. Earman, A. Janis, G. Massey, & N. Rescher (Eds.), Philosophical problems of the internal and external worlds. Essays on the philosophy of Adolf Grünbaum (pp. 3–21). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Carrier, M. (1994a). Geometric facts and geometric theory: Helmholtz and 20th-century philosophy of physical geometry. In L. Krüger (Ed.), Universalgenie Helmholtz. Rückblick nach 100 Jahren (pp. 276–291). Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carrier, M. (1994b). The completeness of scientific theories. On the derivation of empirical indicators within a theoretical framework: The case of physical geometry (Western Ontario Series in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 53). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  5. Carrier, M. (2009). Raum-Zeit. Berlin: de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chang, H. (2004). Inventing temperature: Measurement and scientific progress. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cohen, R. S. (1983). Adolf Grünbaum: A memoir. In R. S. Cohen & L. Laudan (Eds.), Physics, philosophy and psychoanalysis: Essays in honor of Adolf Grünbaum (pp. 9–18). Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Einstein, A. (1949). Reply to Criticisms. In P. A. Schlipp (Ed.), Albert Einstein: Philosopher—Scientist (pp. 665–668). Evanston: Open Court.Google Scholar
  9. Esfeld, M. (2002). Einführung in die Naturphilosophie. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
  10. Farley, J., & Geison, G. L. (1974). Science, politics and spontaneous generation in nineteenth-century France: The Pasteur-Pouchet debate. Bulletin of the History of Medicine,48(2), 161–198.Google Scholar
  11. Grünbaum, A. (1960). The Duhemian argument. Philosophy of Science,27(1), 75–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Grünbaum, A. (1963). Philosophical problems of space and time. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
  13. Grünbaum, A. (1966). The falsifiability of a component of a theoretical system. In P. K. Feyerabend & G. Maxwell (Eds.), Mind, matter, and method: Essays in philosophy and science in honor of Herbert Feigl (pp. 273–305). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  14. Grünbaum, A. (1971). The exclusion of becoming from the physical world. In M. Čapek (Ed.), The concepts of space and time: Their structure and their development (pp. 471–500). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  15. Grünbaum, A. (1973). Philosophical problems of space and time (2nd ed.). Dordrecht/Boston, MA: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Grünbaum, A. (1983). Retrospective versus prospective testing of aetiological hypotheses in Freudian theory. In J. Earman (Ed.), Testing scientific theories (pp. 315–347). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  17. Grünbaum, A. (1984). The foundations of psychoanalysis: A philosophical critique. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  18. Grünbaum, A. (1987). Psychoanalyse in wissenschaftstheoretischer Sicht. Zum Werk Sigmund Freuds und seiner Rezeption. Konstanz: Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
  19. Grünbaum, A. (1992). In defense of secular humanism: A response to recent criticisms. Free Inquiry,12(4), 30–39.Google Scholar
  20. Grünbaum, A. (1993). Theological misinterpretations of current physical cosmology. Philo,1(1), 15–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Grünbaum, A. (1994). Atheismus, Induktivismus und Freud oder: die Vertreibung eines Kölschen Jungen. Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie,42(3), 473–495 (interview with Hans-Peter Krüger).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Grünbaum, A. (1995). The poverty of theistic morality. In K. Gavroglu, J. Stachel, & M. W. Wartofsky (Eds.), Science, mind and art: Essays on science and the humanistic understanding in art, epistemology, religion and ethics, in honor of Robert S. Cohen (pp. 203–242). Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Grünbaum, A. (1999). My exodus to secular humanism. Free Inquiry,19(4), 25.Google Scholar
  24. Grünbaum, A. (2004). The poverty of theistic cosmology. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science,55(4), 561–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Grünbaum, A. (2008a). Why is there a universe at all rather than just nothing? Free Inquiry, 28(4), 32–35 (part 1); 28(5), 37–41 (part 2).Google Scholar
  26. Grünbaum, A. (2008b). Is simplicity evidence of truth? American Philosophical Quarterly,45(2), 179–189.Google Scholar
  27. Grünbaum, A. (2009). Autobiographical philosophical narrative (reprinted from: A. Jokić (Ed.), Philosophy of religion, physics, and psychology: Essays in honor of Adolf Grünbaum (pp. 1–155; bibliography pp. 391–454 (reprinted separately)). Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
  28. Laudan, L. (1965). Discussion: Grünbaum on “The Duhemian argument”. Philosophy of Science,32(3–4), 295–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. López Cerezo, J. A. (2015). Social objectivity under scrutiny in the Pasteur-Pouchet debate. Journal for General Philosophy of Science,46(2), 301–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McDaniel, K. (2016). John M. E. McTaggart. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (winter 2016 ed.). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/mctaggart/.
  31. McMullin, E. (1982). Values in science. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association,1982(2), 3–28.Google Scholar
  32. Putnam, H. (1963). An examination of Grünbaum’s philosophy of geometry. In Mathematics, matter and method (Philosophical papers I) (pp. 93–129). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Putnam, H. (1975). The refutation of conventionalism. In Mathematics, matter and method (Philosophical papers I) (pp. 153–191). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Reichenbach, H. (1928). Philosophie der Raum-Zeit-Lehre. Braunschweig: Vieweg.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Reichenbach, H. (1956). The direction of time. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bibliographies of Adolf Grünbaum and Festschrift Volumes

  1. Cohen, R. S., & Laudan, L. (Eds.). (1983). Physics, philosophy, and psychoanalysis: Essays in honor of Adolf Grünbaum. (Bibliography on pp. 321–331). Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
  2. Earman, J., Janis, A., Massey, G. J., & Rescher N. (Eds.). (1993). Philosophical problems of the internal and external worlds: Essays on the philosophy of Adolf Grünbaum. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press & Konstanz: Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
  3. Grünbaum, A. (2009b). Authobiographical philosophical narrative. In A. Jokić (Ed.), Philosophy of religion, physics, and psychology: Essays in honor of Adolf Grünbaum (pp. 391–454). Amherst, NY: Prometheus.Google Scholar
  4. Jokić, A. (Ed.). (2009). Philosophy of religion, physics, and psychology: Essays in honor of Adolf Grünbaum. Amherst, NY: Prometheus & Konstanz: Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
  5. Mittelstraße, J. (Ed.). (2008). Enzyklopädie Philosophie und Wissenschaftstheorie (Vol. 3, pp. 224–226). Stuttgart: Metzler.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Philosophy, Institute for Interdisciplinary Studies of ScienceBielefeld UniversityBielefeldGermany
  2. 2.Geisteswissenschaftliche Sektion, Fachbereich PhilosophieUniversity of KonstanzConstanceGermany

Personalised recommendations