Labor Force Attachment and Maternity Leave Usage of Cohabiting Mothers in the United States
- 127 Downloads
This paper studies the labor supply decisions of new mothers in cohabiting relationships in the United States. Using cross-sectional data from the 1997 Cohort of the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth as well as from the March Current Population Survey Annual Demographic Supplement, this paper analyzes how the birth of a child impacts a mother’s labor supply. Different subgroups of women based on relationship status are analyzed and compared. Both cross-sectional analyses show that new mothers in cohabiting households behave differently than their married counterparts when it comes to their labor supply after the birth of a child, taking significantly shorter leaves and working more hours in the year of birth. The results also suggest that their partner’s income is not a significant factor in determining their labor supply, which differs from married mothers. This research gives us important insights into the economic decision-making behavior of these nontraditional households.
KeywordsLabor supply Economics of the family Marriage Motherhood Maternity leave Cohabitation
I would like to thank Carlos Liard-Muriente, M.V. Lee Badgett, Marta Murray-Close, and Joya Misra for helpful comments and encouragement. I would also like to thank the participants of the panels at the 2017 IAES and 2018 EEA conferences for their constructive input and suggestions.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
Samantha Marie Schenck declares that she has no conflict of interest.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.
- Becker, G. S. (1982). Treatise on the family. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Bowman, C. G. (2010). Unmarried couples, law, and public policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Cherlin, A. J. (2000). Toward a new home socio-economics of union formation. In L. J. Waite, C. Bachrach, M. Hindin, E. Thompson, & A. Thornton (Eds.), The ties that bind (pp. 126–144). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
- Cherlin, A. J. (2009). The marriage-go-round. Cambridge: Vintage.Google Scholar
- Edin, K., & Kefalas, M. (2005). Promises I can ceep: Why poor women put motherhood before marriage. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- England, P., & Farkas, G. (1986). Households, employment, and gender. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.Google Scholar
- Gemici, A., & Laufer, S. (2011). Marriage and cohabitation. Retrieved November 20, 2018 from https://economics.yale.edu/sites/default/files/files/Workshops-Seminars/Labor-Public/gemici-111006.pdf.
- Grall, T. (2013). Custodial mothers and fathers and their child support: 2011. Report prepared for the United States Census Bureau. U.S. Department of Commerce. Retrieved November 20, 2018 from https://www.census.gov/library/publications/2013/demo/p60-246.html.
- Gustafsson, S. S., Wetzels, C. M. M. P., Vlasblom, J. D., & Dex, S. (1996). Women’s labor force transitions in connection with childbirth: A panel data comparison between Germany, Sweden and Great Britain. Journal of Population Economics, 9(3), 223–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001480050016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Han, W. J., Ruhm, C. J., Waldfogel, J., & Washbrook, E. (2008). The timing of mothers’ employment after childbirth. Monthly Labor Review, 131(6), 15–27.Google Scholar
- Klerman, J. A., & Leibowitz, A. (1997). Labor supply effects of state maternity leave legislation. In F. Blau & R. Ehrenberg (Eds.), Gender and family issues in the workplace (pp. 65–85). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
- Mincer, J., & Polacheck, S. (1974). Family investments in human capital: Earnings of women. In T. W. Schultz (Ed.), Economics of the family: marriage, children, and human capital: A conference report of the national bureau of economic research (pp. 397–431). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor. (2015). National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1997 cohort, 1997–2013 (rounds 1-16). Produced by the National Opinion Research Center, the University of Chicago and distributed by the Center for Human Resource Research. Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University. https://www.nlsinfo.org/. Accessed Dec 2015.
- O’Connell, M., & Bloom, D. (1987). Maternity leave arrangements: 1961–85. Washington: US Bureau of the Census.Google Scholar
- Parker, K., & Wang, W. (2013). Modern parenthood: Roles of moms and dads converge as they balance work and family. Retrieved November 29, 2018 from https://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2013/03/14/modern-parenthood-roles-of-moms-and-dads-converge-as-they-balance-work-and-family/.
- Raley, R. K. (2000). Recent trends and differentials in marriage and cohabitation: The United States. In L. J. Waite (Ed.), The ties that bind: Perspectives on marriage and cohabitation. New York: Walter de Gruyter Inc.Google Scholar
- Ruggles, S., Flood, S., Goeken, R., Grover, J., Meyer, E., Pacas, J., & Sobek, M. (2018). IPUMS USA: Version 8.0.Google Scholar
- Stratton, L. S. (2004). Specialization in household activities within cohabiting versus married households. IZA Working Paper.Google Scholar
- Waite, L. J., & Gallagher, M. (2000). The case for mattiage: Why married people are happier, healthier, and better off financially. New York: Broadway Books.Google Scholar